Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -425.4%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $19M | $16M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-1370160 | $13M | $8M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.09 | 0.37 | 0.19 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 1.51 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.25 | 0.10 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | 4.1% | 9.1% | 8.5% | 14.2% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2.9% | -2.9% | -6.0% | 4.3% | -0.8% | 11.4% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -28.6% | -28.6% | -5.5% | -0.5% | 2.5% | 9.5% | 5.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -425.4% | -425.4% | -40.7% | -1.5% | 5.7% | 251.6% | 37.4% |
| ROA | -51.4% | -51.4% | -16.1% | -1.2% | 5.5% | 82.6% | 12.4% |
| ROIC | — | — | -159.2% | 10.2% | -1.4% | 207.6% | 32.3% |
| ROCE | -42.4% | -42.4% | -44.4% | 11.8% | -1.9% | 295.0% | 41.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 581.77 | 0.34 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | 0.01 | — | 0.06 | 0.70 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -0.74 | -0.83 | 0.00 | 555.44 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | -1.71 | — | 0.06 | -0.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| Interest Coverage | -43.63 | -43.63 | — | 4643.85 | 408.25 | 667.21 | 60.65 |
Net cash position: cash ($11M) exceeds total debt ($5M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.76 | 1.57 | 0.65 | 0.14 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.76 | 1.57 | 87.82 | 65.20 | 1.42 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.54 | 3.54 | 3.97 | 1.10 | 406.40 | 2.38 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | 98.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 94.32 | 58.51 | 55.09 | 56.23 | 56.27 | 120.43 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 4.8% | 8.2% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $4M | $4M | $11M | $11M | $11M |
Liquidity and solvency crisis
Based on reported figures, PSIG trades at a P/S multiple of 0.09, which suggests that the market assigns minimal value to the company's revenue stream given the persistent net losses and the rapid contraction of the firm's total asset base over the last several quarters.
The extremely low P/S ratio indicates that investors are pricing the company as a liquidation play rather than a going concern. This valuation multiple appears appropriate given the lack of positive earnings and the absence of a clear path to profitability in the current freight forwarding environment.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin of 1.64% highlights a fundamental inability to capture value in a brokerage-heavy model, leaving the firm with no buffer to cover fixed operating costs and resulting in a deeply negative net margin of -28.63%.
The thin gross margin suggests that PSIG lacks the scale or proprietary service differentiation required to command pricing power. Consequently, the operating losses appear structural rather than cyclical, as the company's cost base remains misaligned with its declining transactional volume.
According to recent SEC filings, PSIG's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -5.5% in 2024Q1, which confirms that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than generating returns on its invested capital base.
The consistent decline in ROIC over the past ten quarters reflects the erosion of the company's asset base and its inability to deploy capital effectively. Investors should monitor whether management can stabilize these returns, though current trends suggest a continued decay in capital efficiency.
Based on the 2024Q1 balance sheet, the current ratio has plummeted to 0.03, indicating that the company's ability to meet short-term obligations is severely compromised and warrants immediate investigation into its ongoing solvency and potential need for external financing.
The rapid deterioration of the current ratio from historical levels suggests that the company is struggling to manage its working capital cycle effectively. This liquidity shortfall poses a significant risk to operations, as the firm may lack the necessary cash to settle payables to carriers.
The most commonly misapplied metric for PSIG is gross revenue, which obscures the company's true economic contribution by failing to account for the high pass-through costs inherent in the freight forwarding industry's brokerage-based business model.
Analysts should prioritize net revenue or gross profit as a more accurate measure of the company's value-add. Relying on gross revenue figures significantly overstates the firm's market relevance and masks the underlying fragility of its 1.64% gross margin profile.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PSIG stock.
PS International Group Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -0.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
PS International Group Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -425.4%. The historical average is -28.8%.
Based on historical data, PS International Group Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -0.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PS International Group Ltd. has 1.6% gross margin and -2.9% operating margin.