Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -41.5x · EV/EBITDA 22.2x · ROE -5.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.5B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $2.5B | $2.3B | $5.1B | $2.9B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.3B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $2.3B | $5.1B | $2.7B | $2.3B | $1.9B | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -41.50 | — | 72.58 | 43.59 | 19.40 | 47.64 | 58.16 | 49.30 | 21.08 | 37.31 | 28.98 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.07 | 2.08 | 2.28 | 2.72 | 2.33 | 5.52 | 3.62 | 2.60 | 2.10 | 3.66 | 2.13 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.15 | 1.41 | 1.51 | 1.96 | 1.93 | 4.60 | 2.85 | 2.50 | 2.18 | 3.92 | 2.20 |
| P/FCF | 35.00 | 23.70 | 26.62 | 33.20 | 178.10 | 96.62 | 23.30 | 21.27 | 93.80 | 26.87 | 14.16 |
| P/OCF | 24.59 | 16.65 | 14.87 | 18.80 | 17.47 | 41.40 | 17.60 | 14.47 | 27.66 | 21.61 | 11.97 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.88 | 2.11 | 2.63 | 2.32 | 5.48 | 3.42 | 2.56 | 2.18 | 3.60 | 2.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.20 | 14.55 | 23.62 | 17.51 | 11.85 | 31.82 | 19.80 | 14.40 | 11.76 | 17.08 | 11.93 |
| EV / EBIT | 44.75 | — | 35.88 | 31.26 | 33.55 | 40.35 | 34.06 | 20.22 | 16.90 | 22.35 | 16.34 |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.49 | 24.71 | 32.10 | 177.52 | 95.83 | 22.04 | 20.96 | 97.12 | 26.48 | 14.34 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 31.7% | 33.4% | 33.8% | 33.1% | 37.4% | 36.4% | 35.0% | 35.4% | 38.8% | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 6.4% | 3.0% | 9.4% | 14.9% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 12.3% | 12.8% | 15.7% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7.6% | -7.6% | 3.1% | 6.2% | 12.0% | 11.6% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 10.0% | 9.8% | 7.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -5.1% | -5.1% | 2.1% | 4.7% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 5.1% | 5.3% | 10.9% | 11.5% | 7.9% |
| ROA | -4.2% | -4.2% | 1.7% | 3.6% | 7.2% | 7.6% | 3.9% | 3.7% | 7.3% | 7.4% | 4.9% |
| ROIC | 3.6% | 3.6% | 1.6% | 5.5% | 9.7% | 9.1% | 5.7% | 9.1% | 10.3% | 14.1% | 10.0% |
| ROCE | 3.9% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 5.9% | 9.8% | 9.1% | 5.8% | 9.4% | 10.3% | 13.1% | 8.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.39 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 1.20 | 1.19 | 0.25 | 0.83 | 1.43 | 0.79 | 2.06 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.13 | -0.11 | -0.06 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.15 | -0.04 | 0.08 | -0.06 | 0.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.50 | -1.50 | -1.82 | -0.60 | -0.04 | -0.26 | -1.13 | -0.22 | 0.40 | -0.25 | 0.14 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.21 | -1.90 | -1.10 | -0.58 | -0.79 | -1.26 | -0.32 | 3.32 | -0.39 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage | -37.58 | -37.58 | 22.23 | 6.76 | 6.57 | 41.14 | 16.52 | 13.10 | 17.09 | 21.60 | 22.06 |
Net cash position: cash ($197M) exceeds total debt ($40M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.97 | 3.97 | 4.00 | 4.53 | 4.63 | 3.56 | 4.25 | 4.63 | 4.53 | 3.99 | 4.53 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.97 | 2.97 | 2.85 | 3.21 | 3.35 | 2.75 | 3.33 | 3.30 | 3.29 | 3.00 | 3.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.29 | 1.13 | 1.66 | 1.42 | 1.72 | 1.66 | 1.57 | 1.59 | 2.25 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.43 | 4.43 | 3.89 | 3.92 | 3.56 | 4.38 | 4.99 | 4.40 | 4.28 | 4.46 | 4.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 73.47 | 71.80 | 84.94 | 82.76 | 79.38 | 74.58 | 60.56 | 71.20 | 65.01 | 70.46 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 1.4% | 2.3% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 4.7% | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| FCF Yield | 2.9% | 4.2% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 1.1% | 3.7% | 7.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.1% | 3.1% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.1% | 3.1% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $19M | $18M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ROG stock.
Rogers Corporation's current P/E ratio is -41.5x. The historical average is 29.7x.
Rogers Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 22.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.8x.
Rogers Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -5.1%. The historical average is 9.4%.
Based on historical data, Rogers Corporation is trading at a P/E of -41.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Rogers Corporation has 31.7% gross margin and 6.4% operating margin.
Rogers Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent below-the-line charges
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Structural Drag
Gross margin improved to 32.5% in 2026Q2 from 29.9% in 2025Q1, but remains below the 35.2% peak in 2024Q3, per reported financials. Operating margin at 9.2% shows leverage, yet net margin is deeply negative at -7.6% TTM.
The sequential gross margin recovery suggests better capacity utilization, but the level is still below the 2024Q3 high, indicating a possible mix shift toward lower-margin products or persistent pricing pressure. Operating margin expansion to 9.2% in 2026Q2 from a -33.3% trough in 2025Q2 demonstrates significant operating leverage, yet the TTM net margin of -7.6% implies that below-the-line charges, likely merger-related, are obscuring the underlying earnings power. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin can reclaim the 35% level, as that would signal a more durable recovery.
Return on Capital Recovering from Depressed Base
ROIC improved to 1.5% in 2026Q2 from -4.6% in 2025Q2, per reported data, but remains far below the cost of capital. ROE at 1.1% is positive but still weak, reflecting a slow recovery from the 2025 trough.
The sharp swing in ROIC from -4.6% to 1.5% over four quarters indicates that the company is emerging from a period of severe underutilization, but the absolute level remains inadequate for a specialty materials firm. The low ROE of 1.1% in 2026Q2, despite a clean balance sheet, suggests that the asset base is not yet generating sufficient returns. This may reflect the high fixed-cost structure and the lag between R&D investment and revenue contribution, which is typical for design-in businesses. The trend is positive, but the company needs to sustain sequential improvements to justify its current valuation.
Working Capital Drag Eases but Remains Elevated
Cash conversion cycle improved to 118 days in 2026Q2 from 155 days in 2024Q4, per reported figures, driven by lower DIO and DSO. However, the cycle remains long, indicating significant capital tied up in inventory and receivables.
The reduction in DIO from 105 days to 80 days and DSO from 89 days to 74 days over the past six quarters suggests better inventory management and faster collections, which is a positive sign. However, a CCC of 118 days is still high, reflecting the nature of the business where customers require long qualification cycles and inventory must be built ahead of demand. The DPO has remained stable around 33 days, indicating that Rogers is not stretching supplier payments to fund operations. This efficiency improvement is a key driver of the positive operating cash flow, but the absolute level of working capital investment remains a drag on returns.
Minimal Debt Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.02 with interest coverage of 54.5x in 2026Q2, per reported data, indicating negligible leverage. This conservative capital structure offers a buffer against operational volatility and strategic uncertainty.
With total debt of only $20.6M against $1.2B equity, Rogers has essentially no financial risk, and interest coverage is exceptionally high. This balance sheet strength is a critical advantage, especially given the recent failed merger and the need to invest in R&D and capacity for EV and 5G opportunities. The low leverage also suggests that management has ample capacity to fund growth initiatives or return capital to shareholders without straining the balance sheet. However, the lack of debt also means the company is not using leverage to enhance returns, which may be a deliberate choice given the cyclicality of its end markets.
Liquidity Buffer Shields Against Downturns
Current ratio of 3.99 and quick ratio of 3.03 in 2026Q2, per reported data, provide a substantial cushion. Cash of $181.4M covers short-term obligations comfortably, even under a severe demand scenario.
The current ratio has remained above 3.8 for the past ten quarters, indicating a consistently strong liquidity position. The quick ratio of 3.03, which excludes inventory, still shows that Rogers can meet its short-term liabilities without relying on inventory sales. This liquidity is particularly important given the high fixed-cost structure and the potential for demand volatility in the telecom and automotive sectors. The cash position of $181.4M, combined with minimal debt, gives the company the flexibility to weather a prolonged downturn or make strategic acquisitions. However, the negative TTM net income suggests that the cash buffer is being used to absorb losses, so investors should monitor whether the cash balance stabilizes.
P/E Misleads on Underlying Earnings Power
The TTM P/E of -37.66 is meaningless due to negative net income, while forward P/E of 33.74 appears rich, per reported data. EV/EBITDA of 20.01 is a more reliable gauge, but it still embeds the impact of one-time charges.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Rogers is the P/E, because the negative TTM net income, driven by merger-related charges, makes the ratio uninformative. Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA, which at 20.01 is elevated relative to the company's own history and peers like Entegris (19.49), but this multiple may be justified if the EBITDA is depressed by the current cycle. A better approach is to normalize EBITDA by adding back non-recurring items and using a mid-cycle margin assumption. Additionally, the forward P/E of 33.74 implies that the market expects a significant earnings recovery, which may be optimistic given the persistent revenue decline. Analysts should adjust for the one-time charges and evaluate the company on its cash-generative core operations, as indicated by the positive operating cash flow.