Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2021–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5M | $5M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $31M | $31M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.03 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 29.22 | 27.94 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 162.54 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 81.9% | 81.9% | 76.0% | -547.1% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | -73510.0% | -73510.0% | -17928.9% | -92955.0% | -954.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -91937.2% | -91937.2% | -21189.8% | -96139.3% | -966.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -1546.7% | -1546.7% | -1468.7% | -921.7% | -168.6% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | — | — | — | — | -1080.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -13.07 | -13.07 | -5.43 | -27.55 | -123.56 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.31 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.14 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.90 | — | — | — | 4.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1447.38 | 456.06 | 28.07 | 206.66 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 1.9% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 1.9% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $13M | $21M | $22M |
Insufficient liquidity for operations
Based on reported figures, the company trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 29.03, a valuation that appears to price in aggressive future market penetration rather than current operational output, as evidenced by the lack of meaningful earnings or cash flow to support traditional valuation metrics.
The high P/S ratio suggests that investors are valuing the firm as a high-growth AI option rather than a mature software business. This valuation is highly sensitive to execution risk, as any delay in commercializing the 'Brain' AI platform could lead to a significant contraction in multiples.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's ROIC of -4.3% in 2025Q2 highlights a persistent inability to generate positive returns on invested capital, reflecting the heavy R&D spending required to build out the proprietary mobile engagement layer ahead of any significant commercial scale.
The negative ROIC trend indicates that capital is currently being consumed to fund infrastructure and development rather than generating productive returns. Investors should monitor whether future revenue growth can eventually outpace the current capital intensity to stabilize these returns.
According to the 2025Q2 data, the asset turnover ratio of 0.16 remains extremely low, suggesting that the company's current asset base is not yet effectively utilized to drive revenue, which is typical for an early-stage firm in the pre-commercialization phase of its business cycle.
The low turnover reflects the disconnect between the company's significant investment in technology and its current revenue generation. Improving this ratio will require a shift toward higher transaction volumes that can better leverage the existing software platform and administrative infrastructure.
Based on the 2025Q2 balance sheet, the current ratio of 0.24 indicates a severe liquidity mismatch, as short-term obligations significantly outweigh available cash, leaving the company highly vulnerable to operational shocks or the need for dilutive financing to maintain its current burn rate.
The current ratio suggests that the company lacks the necessary liquid assets to cover its immediate liabilities without external support. This liquidity position warrants close monitoring, as the firm's ability to continue operations is directly tied to its success in securing additional capital.
As indicated by the negative TTM P/E of -0.03, the price-to-earnings ratio is a fundamentally flawed metric for this business model, as it obscures the massive R&D-driven losses that are currently necessary to build the company's proprietary AI-based mobile engagement technology.
Using P/E to evaluate Rezolve AI is misleading because it treats essential growth-oriented R&D as a permanent drag on earnings rather than a strategic investment. Analysts should instead focus on 'Cash Runway Duration' and 'Merchant Integration Velocity' to better assess the company's progress toward commercial viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RZLVW stock.
Rezolve AI Limited Warrants's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Rezolve AI Limited Warrants is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Rezolve AI Limited Warrants has 81.9% gross margin and -73510.0% operating margin.