Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 48.4x · EV/EBITDA 23.2x · ROE 10.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.6B | $6.3B | $3.9B | $3.2B | $2.9B | $2.7B | $1.9B | $2.3B | $1.9B | $2.9B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.0B | $5.7B | $3.7B | $3.0B | $2.8B | $2.4B | $1.8B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $3.0B | $2.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 48.35 | 25.59 | 17.61 | 10.48 | 11.35 | 9.61 | 13.73 | 16.30 | — | 20.87 | 11.96 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.42 | 0.77 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.42 | 0.35 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.69 | 2.48 | 1.66 | 1.40 | 1.60 | 1.41 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 1.31 | 1.76 | 1.39 |
| P/FCF | 24.42 | 13.30 | 17.13 | 74.13 | 15.13 | 9.96 | 8.11 | 9.27 | 51.34 | 20.86 | 8.32 |
| P/OCF | 18.62 | 10.14 | 11.53 | 13.81 | 8.79 | 7.84 | 6.37 | 6.01 | 12.32 | 11.57 | 5.75 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.18 | 12.08 | 8.04 | 5.23 | 6.09 | 6.53 | 5.51 | 7.58 | 8.88 | 8.62 | 6.85 |
| EV / EBIT | 30.98 | 16.65 | 10.62 | 6.68 | 8.59 | 7.93 | 8.30 | 7.44 | 11.81 | 13.06 | 10.10 |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.09 | 16.08 | 68.50 | 14.52 | 8.97 | 7.78 | 8.99 | 56.35 | 21.39 | 8.55 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.8% | 8.8% | 8.5% | 8.3% | 7.9% | 7.8% | 7.4% | 7.2% | 6.5% | 7.6% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.7% | 3.3% | 3.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.0% | 3.0% | 2.9% | 3.5% | 3.0% | 3.7% | 1.9% | 1.7% | -1.3% | 2.0% | 2.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0% | 10.0% | 9.5% | 15.0% | 13.0% | 14.2% | 8.1% | 9.1% | -6.1% | 8.5% | 12.0% |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 6.3% | 3.5% | 3.5% | -2.4% | 3.7% | 5.3% |
| ROIC | 13.0% | 13.0% | 12.0% | 18.1% | 15.8% | 12.1% | 10.5% | 8.2% | 5.3% | 10.0% | 10.2% |
| ROCE | 12.0% | 12.0% | 11.7% | 17.5% | 14.5% | 10.9% | 9.8% | 9.1% | 6.1% | 10.2% | 10.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.90 | 1.06 | 1.20 | 1.31 | 2.55 | 1.39 | 1.37 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.23 | -0.10 | -0.11 | -0.06 | -0.14 | -0.05 | -0.04 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.21 | -1.21 | -0.53 | -0.43 | -0.26 | -0.72 | -0.24 | -0.24 | 0.79 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.21 | -1.06 | -5.62 | -0.61 | -0.99 | -0.33 | -0.28 | 5.01 | 0.53 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage | 80.01 | 80.01 | 11.88 | 12.38 | 14.45 | 15.41 | 7.65 | 9.75 | 6.46 | 10.39 | 9.17 |
Net cash position: cash ($966M) exceeds total debt ($394M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.99 | 1.91 | 1.57 | 1.86 | 1.85 | 1.74 | 1.26 | 1.62 | 1.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.25 | 1.18 | 0.89 | 1.27 | 1.29 | 1.20 | 0.68 | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.28 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.39 | 1.57 | 1.83 | 1.64 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 2.11 | 1.74 | 1.79 | 1.79 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.73 | 3.73 | 4.80 | 5.55 | 4.33 | 5.99 | 7.47 | 8.49 | 4.84 | 6.04 | 6.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 82.00 | 83.03 | 68.49 | 74.41 | 83.48 | 75.62 | 67.59 | 60.43 | 59.00 | 54.83 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.1% | 3.9% | 5.7% | 9.5% | 8.8% | 10.4% | 7.3% | 6.1% | — | 4.8% | 8.4% |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 7.5% | 5.8% | 1.3% | 6.6% | 10.0% | 12.3% | 10.8% | 1.9% | 4.8% | 12.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.0% | 1.8% | 6.5% | 3.3% | 11.4% | 2.4% | 9.3% | 0.5% | 8.2% | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.0% | 1.8% | 6.5% | 3.3% | 11.4% | 2.4% | 9.3% | 0.5% | 8.2% | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $55M | $57M | $60M | $63M | $69M | $71M | $72M | $70M | $78M | $79M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SANM stock.
Sanmina Corporation's current P/E ratio is 48.4x. The historical average is 26.3x. This places it at the 81th percentile of its historical range.
Sanmina Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 23.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.7x.
Sanmina Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.0%. The historical average is 1.3%.
Based on historical data, Sanmina Corporation is trading at a P/E of 48.4x. This is at the 81th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sanmina Corporation has 8.8% gross margin and 4.4% operating margin.
Sanmina Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Customer concentration and AI cyclicality
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion on Mix Shift
Gross margin expanded 220 bps to 10.5% by 2026Q3, per reported figures, while operating margin rose to 6.4%, indicating a favorable shift toward higher-complexity programs and operating leverage.
The sequential improvement in gross margin from 8.8% in 2026Q2 to 10.5% in 2026Q3, as reported in financial statements, suggests that the revenue mix is tilting toward higher-value components and services, likely from the ZT Systems integration. Operating margin expansion to 6.4% from 5.7% in the prior quarter, per the data, implies that fixed costs are being spread over a larger revenue base, though the sustainability of this margin profile depends on continued demand for AI infrastructure. Investors should monitor whether this margin level persists as the revenue surge normalizes.
ROIC Inflection on AI Capacity
ROIC improved from 3.0% in 2024Q2 to 5.1% in 2026Q3, per reported figures, but remains below the cost of capital, suggesting that the AI-driven asset expansion has yet to generate adequate returns.
The rise in ROIC, as shown in the data, is driven by both margin expansion and asset turnover, but the absolute level remains modest relative to peers like Jabil and Celestica, which report ROIC above 30%. The significant increase in invested capital, particularly from the ZT Systems acquisition and higher PPE, has not yet translated into proportional returns, indicating that the company is in an investment phase. If the AI infrastructure demand sustains, ROIC could continue to climb, but the current trajectory suggests a lag between capital deployment and earnings generation.
Working Capital Stretch on Growth
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 86 days in 2026Q3 from 75 days a year earlier, per reported figures, as DIO rose to 91 days, indicating inventory build-up to support AI-driven demand.
The increase in days inventory outstanding to 91 days, as per the data, suggests that Sanmina is stocking up on components to meet accelerated production schedules, which may be prudent given supply chain constraints but also raises obsolescence risk. DSO improved to 68 days from 79 days in 2025Q4, per reported figures, indicating better receivables collection, possibly due to prepayments from customers. The net effect is a longer cash conversion cycle, which ties up cash and may pressure liquidity if the growth pace slows.
Leverage Surge Post-Acquisition
Debt-to-equity jumped from 0.16 in 2025Q4 to 0.88 in 2026Q3, per financial statements, while interest coverage fell to 6.91x from 15.72x, indicating increased financial risk from the ZT Systems deal.
The sharp increase in leverage, as reported in the data, reflects the debt-financed acquisition, which has raised the company's financial risk profile. Interest coverage, though still adequate, has more than halved, suggesting that earnings are now more sensitive to interest rate movements. The D/EBITDA ratio of 10.85x in 2026Q3, per the data, is elevated compared to the prior year's 3.65x, indicating that debt service is consuming a larger share of cash flow. Investors should monitor whether the acquired assets generate sufficient returns to service this debt and whether the company can deleverage over time.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Adequate
Current ratio dipped to 1.78 in 2026Q3 from 1.91 a year earlier, per reported figures, while cash nearly tripled to $1.8B, indicating a still-strong liquidity position despite rising debt.
The current ratio, as shown in the data, remains above 1.5, suggesting that short-term obligations are comfortably covered, though the quick ratio of 1.06 indicates a heavier reliance on inventory. The substantial cash balance, per the balance sheet analysis, provides a cushion against working capital swings and potential disruptions. However, the increase in debt and the need to fund ongoing capex may reduce this buffer over time, so investors should watch for any deterioration in the current ratio below 1.5.
Misapplied P/E on Cyclical Peak
The trailing P/E of 42.35, per current valuation multiples, is misleading given the AI-driven earnings surge; forward P/E of 15.76 better reflects normalized earnings, but even that may understate cyclicality.
The market often applies a simple P/E to EMS companies, but Sanmina's earnings are highly cyclical and currently boosted by AI infrastructure demand. The trailing P/E is distorted by the low earnings base of the past year, while the forward P/E assumes sustained growth that may not materialize if customer orders normalize. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 20.15x trailing and 11.44x forward, per the data, better captures the company's operating performance and leverage. Investors should also consider the impact of customer concentration and the potential for margin compression, which a P/E does not reveal.