Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -37.5x · EV/EBITDA 10.3x · ROE -2.7%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.9B | $2.1B | $2.8B | $3.5B | $1.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.2B | $2.4B | $2.9B | $3.4B | $1.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -37.48 | — | 6.11 | 11.67 | 0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.02 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.38 | 1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.01 | 0.75 | 0.95 | 1.17 | 0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 18.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 31.41 | 12.19 | 181.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.69 | 2.10 | 2.32 | 1.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.33 | 7.87 | 5.01 | 7.05 | 7.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 45.43 | 242.26 | 7.37 | 10.06 | 0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 18.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 12.0% | 21.2% | 38.4% | 30.0% | -4.2% | -33.6% | -17.2% | 32.4% | 60.4% | 65.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 4.9% | 29.7% | 22.4% | 7.7% | -17.2% | -466.3% | -21.3% | -30.5% | 6.8% | 31.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.4% | -5.4% | 32.2% | 20.4% | 417.4% | -64.7% | -484.8% | -87.8% | -379.3% | -148.7% | -6.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.7% | -2.7% | 15.1% | 12.8% | 229.6% | — | — | -50.1% | -89.4% | -34.9% | -1.8% |
| ROA | -1.9% | -1.9% | 10.7% | 8.5% | 116.7% | -14.9% | -70.4% | -12.1% | -31.1% | -15.0% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | 1.7% | 1.7% | 10.4% | 10.6% | 3.1% | — | -70.4% | -2.8% | -2.3% | 0.6% | 3.6% |
| ROCE | 1.9% | 1.9% | 11.0% | 10.6% | 2.9% | -6.2% | -151.3% | -3.1% | -2.6% | 0.8% | 5.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.30 | — | — | 3.56 | 2.32 | 1.30 | 1.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.99 | 1.99 | 1.07 | 1.26 | 2.31 | — | — | 48.75 | 23.47 | 10.13 | 6.00 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.10 | 0.05 | -0.03 | 0.02 | — | — | 2.96 | 1.82 | 1.11 | 0.87 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.24 | -0.18 | 0.17 | — | — | 40.45 | 18.40 | 8.72 | 5.18 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | 25.27 | 8.31 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.16 | 0.16 | 6.46 | 5.75 | 35.90 | -4.25 | -10.13 | -0.81 | -1.50 | 0.64 | 2.26 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.85 | 2.98 | 2.12 | 1.44 | 0.16 | 2.30 | 5.96 | 2.62 | 0.61 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.85 | 2.98 | 2.12 | 1.44 | 0.16 | 2.30 | 5.96 | 2.62 | 0.61 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 1.79 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 1.41 | 3.45 | 1.61 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.15 | 65.36 | 73.99 | 63.95 | 74.85 | 79.76 | 75.73 | 119.20 | 94.76 | 59.38 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 16.4% | 8.6% | 224.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 5.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 19.2% | 7.5% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 19.2% | 7.5% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $62M | $71M | $74M | $50M | $100M | $100M | $100M | $301M | $505M | $501M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SDRL stock.
Seadrill Limited's current P/E ratio is -37.5x. The historical average is 6.1x.
Seadrill Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 10.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.8x.
Seadrill Limited's return on equity (ROE) is -2.7%. The historical average is 14.2%.
Based on historical data, Seadrill Limited is trading at a P/E of -37.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Seadrill Limited has 12.0% gross margin and 4.9% operating margin.
Seadrill Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Working capital drain persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Recovery
Gross margin swung from 8.5% in 2025Q2 to 38.5% in 2026Q2, yet the four-quarter average sits near 17%, suggesting the latest spike may be unsustainable, per reported quarterly data.
The 2026Q2 gross margin of 38.5% appears to reflect a favorable mix of high-spec floater contracts and lower reactivation costs, but the prior quarter's 14.0% and the 2025Q2's 8.5% illustrate the lumpiness inherent in this business. Operating margin of 16.0% in 2026Q2 is the highest in the series, yet net margin of 6.5% remains thin, indicating that depreciation and interest still consume a significant portion of gross profit. Investors should monitor whether the raised guidance translates into sustained margin expansion, as the average gross margin over the last four quarters is only 16.8%, per the income statement data.
Return on Capital Inflects but Remains Low
ROIC improved to 1.7% in 2026Q2 from 0.1% a year earlier, yet it remains far below the cost of capital, suggesting the fleet is still underearning, based on reported figures.
The sequential improvement in ROIC from 0.6% in 2026Q1 to 1.7% in 2026Q2 is directionally positive, but the absolute level is insufficient to justify the current asset base. ROE of 1.0% in 2026Q2, while positive, is still below the risk-free rate, implying that the company is not yet creating economic value. The 2024Q2 ROIC of 7.5% was an outlier driven by a one-time gain, so the recent trend is more indicative of the underlying earning power. Given the high fixed-cost structure, ROIC should scale rapidly if dayrates and utilization continue to improve, but the current data suggests a slow recovery.
Working Capital Swings Dominate Cash Flow
DSO improved to 53 days in 2026Q2 from 70 days in 2024Q4, but working capital changes were negative in every quarter, with a $141M outflow in 2025Q4, per the cash flow statement.
The improvement in DSO suggests better collection discipline, but the persistent negative working capital changes indicate that the company is absorbing cash as it scales operations. The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, but the negative operating cash flow in 2026Q2 (-$162M) against net income of $29M highlights the gap between accrual earnings and cash generation. This divergence may reflect the timing of contract prepayments and the buildup of receivables, but it warrants monitoring as the company grows revenue. Asset turnover remains low at 0.11, consistent with the capital-intensive nature of the business, but any improvement in utilization should lift this metric.
Leverage Creeps Higher but Remains Manageable
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.26 in 2026Q2 from 0.21 a year earlier, while interest coverage improved to 3.56x, indicating a comfortable debt service position, per the latest balance sheet.
The increase in D/E is modest and reflects higher debt levels ($737M in 2026Q2 vs. $609M in 2024Q1), but the absolute leverage is still low compared to peers like Transocean (D/E 0.70). Interest coverage of 3.56x in 2026Q2 is the strongest in the series, up from 0.13x in 2025Q2, suggesting that operating income is now sufficient to cover interest expenses. However, the negative interest coverage in 2025Q4 (-1.44x) and 2024Q4 (-1.13x) shows how quickly this metric can deteriorate when margins compress. The company's low leverage provides a buffer against cyclical downturns, but the rising debt trend warrants monitoring if cash flow remains negative.
Liquidity Buffer Thins as Cash Declines
Current ratio improved to 2.50 in 2026Q2, but cash fell to $337M from $478M a year earlier, suggesting a shrinking liquidity cushion despite a healthy ratio, per the balance sheet.
The current ratio of 2.50 appears strong, but it is inflated by the low level of current liabilities relative to the asset base. The decline in cash from $835M in 2024Q2 to $337M in 2026Q2 is concerning, especially given the negative operating cash flow in the latest quarter. The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 2.50, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, which is typical for a service company. Under a severe stress scenario, the company could face liquidity constraints if cash continues to drain at the current pace, though the low debt levels provide some flexibility.
Misapplied Metric: Net Margin
Net margin is often misapplied to SDRL because heavy depreciation and one-time items distort it; EV/EBITDA or cash-based metrics better capture the underlying economics, per the reported data.
The negative net margin in several quarters (e.g., -11.1% in 2025Q2) is driven by non-cash depreciation and amortization of the expensive fleet, which does not reflect the company's cash-generative potential. For example, 2024Q4 net margin was 34.9% despite negative operating income, due to one-time gains, illustrating the distortion. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA, which at 10.63x TTM and 7.04x forward, suggests the market is pricing in a recovery. Additionally, free cash flow margin is volatile and often negative, so EBITDA or EBITDAR may be more appropriate for comparing across the cycle. The company's true earning power is better assessed by looking at cash operating margins and the potential for operating leverage as dayrates recover.