Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -310.7%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $359M | $230M | $330M | $324M | $637M | $1.1B | $199M | $173M | $408M | $308M | $238M |
| Enterprise Value | $360M | $231M | $316M | $296M | $676M | $1.2B | $243M | $196M | $322M | $317M | $244M |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.40 | 6.53 | 14.67 | 14.46 | 38.85 | 82.46 | 40.16 | 8.12 | 21.56 | 48.41 | 717.72 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.87 | 3.77 | — | 9.04 | — | — | — | — | 5.72 | 42.45 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.56 | 14.07 | 13.21 | 41.27 | 84.71 | 49.19 | 9.18 | 17.02 | 49.71 | 736.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | 4.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.7% | 44.7% | 2.4% | 13.8% | 16.6% | -5.9% | -350.9% | -91.3% | -43.1% | -53.1% | -98.8% |
| Operating Margin | -193.8% | -193.8% | -333.0% | -337.7% | -418.7% | -418.1% | -1598.9% | -613.4% | -463.1% | -883.6% | -12781.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -196.0% | -196.0% | -349.8% | -269.7% | 867.2% | -2211.9% | -3539.5% | -542.5% | -496.9% | -927.4% | -13231.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -310.7% | -310.7% | -817.2% | -363.6% | — | — | — | -369.1% | -239.3% | -4945.7% | — |
| ROA | -61.0% | -61.0% | -65.9% | -38.2% | 75.5% | -257.6% | -207.6% | -78.9% | -91.3% | -173.3% | -316.5% |
| ROIC | -322.6% | -322.6% | — | -252.7% | — | — | — | — | -12643.6% | -500.0% | — |
| ROCE | -83.6% | -83.6% | -82.0% | -56.6% | -42.0% | -57.2% | -623.7% | -190.5% | -113.8% | -336.7% | -964.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.68 | 0.68 | — | 1.33 | — | — | — | — | 0.72 | 3.37 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.01 | — | -0.78 | — | — | — | — | -1.20 | 1.15 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -12.96 | -12.96 | -8.32 | -4.44 | 8.60 | -17.09 | -9.83 | -6.63 | -10.35 | -18.07 | -26.42 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.83 | 4.83 | 2.35 | 7.53 | 5.12 | 7.85 | 1.82 | 1.01 | 5.47 | 1.94 | 1.84 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.55 | 4.55 | 2.24 | 7.03 | 4.89 | 7.51 | 1.50 | 0.87 | 5.12 | 1.81 | 1.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.87 | 3.87 | 1.92 | 6.34 | 4.58 | 7.06 | 1.08 | 0.76 | 4.74 | 1.58 | 1.75 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.91 | 2.91 | 4.96 | 2.20 | 1.87 | 2.29 | 4.23 | 2.41 | 2.64 | 3.26 | 1.38 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 128.68 | 131.22 | 107.54 | 62.07 | 64.49 | 220.22 | 179.68 | 136.96 | 193.93 | 275.95 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $42M | $31M | $28M | $31M | $21M | $11M | $9M | $8M | $6M | $4M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SENS stock.
Senseonics Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Senseonics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -310.7%. The historical average is -351.9%.
Based on historical data, Senseonics Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Senseonics Holdings, Inc. has 44.7% gross margin and -193.8% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn sustainability risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Valuation on Growth Speculation
Senseonics' P/S of 11.82 and P/B of 6.82, as per current market data, represent significant premiums relative to profitable peers like DexCom and Insulet, pricing in substantial future growth despite negative earnings.
The valuation multiples are detached from current earnings, which are nonexistent, forcing reliance on revenue and book value metrics. The high P/S relative to sector averages suggests investors are pricing in a successful commercialization that has yet to translate into bottom-line profits. This creates significant downside risk if growth decelerates or the path to profitability lengthens.
Gross Margin Surge vs. Operating Losses
According to Q2 2026 financial statements, Senseonics achieved a gross margin of 59.1%, a dramatic improvement, but this was insufficient to overcome an operating expense burden that resulted in a -2.5% operating margin.
The gross margin inflection is a positive signal for the underlying product economics and scaling efficiency. However, the operating and net margins remain deeply negative, indicating that the company's cost structure, particularly R&D and SG&A, is still overwhelming its revenue base. Achieving breakeven will require not just revenue growth but also significant operating leverage or expense discipline.
Debt Serviceability Under Negative Earnings
Based on reported ratios, Senseonics' interest coverage stood at -21.94 in Q2 2026, indicating that the company's negative operating income provides no cushion for debt servicing costs.
While the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.68 is not alarmingly high in absolute terms, the negative interest coverage underscores a fundamental vulnerability. The company is reliant on cash reserves or continued access to capital markets to service and refinance its debt, as operations do not generate sufficient cash. This elevates refinancing risk, especially if market conditions deteriorate.
Strong Current Ratios Mask Burn Rate
As reported in the balance sheet, Senseonics' current ratio of 6.74 appears robust, but this is contrasted by a quarterly operating cash burn of over $30 million, indicating the liquid assets are being actively consumed.
The high current and quick ratios are primarily a function of the company's recent equity infusion and inventory buildup, not operational cash generation. The sustainability of this liquidity position is entirely dependent on the burn rate. Without a sharp reduction in cash outflows or an imminent pivot to positive cash flow, the company will likely require additional financing within the next several quarters.
Working Capital Tied Up in Growth Phase
According to the data, Senseonics' cash conversion cycle extended to 147 days in Q2 2026, driven by high inventory levels (129 days) and receivables (80 days), indicating inefficient working capital management.
The long cash conversion cycle reveals that cash is being tied up in the operational cycle, which is typical for a company in a high-growth, commercialization phase. The high DIO suggests a build-up of inventory to support future sales, while the DSO indicates potential customer payment terms or collection challenges. Improving these metrics would significantly enhance cash flow and reduce external funding needs.
The Misleading Strength of Current Ratio
The current ratio is the most misapplied metric for Senseonics; its apparent strength of 6.74 obscures the underlying reality of rapid cash consumption and a lack of operational cash generation.
For a pre-profit, high-burn company, the current ratio is a poor indicator of financial health because it includes non-liquid assets like inventory and receivables that may not be quickly convertible to cash. Investors should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the calculated runway (cash divided by quarterly burn) as a more meaningful measure of near-term solvency and financing risk.