Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 19.3x · EV/EBITDA 13.2x · ROE 17.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.2B | $18.6B | $18.4B | $15.6B | $12.4B | $11.8B | $9.4B | $9.5B | $8.3B | $10.2B | $10.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $18.9B | $18.3B | $18.3B | $15.8B | $12.9B | $12.3B | $10.0B | $10.5B | $9.3B | $11.3B | $11.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 19.29 | 18.29 | 17.61 | 15.40 | 13.58 | 14.44 | 14.96 | 13.65 | 12.24 | 18.31 | 18.62 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.71 | 3.61 | 3.60 | 3.05 | 2.56 | 2.57 | 2.61 | 2.54 | 2.23 | 2.77 | 2.97 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.29 | 3.12 | 3.39 | 3.06 | 2.75 | 2.82 | 2.44 | 2.76 | 2.67 | 3.44 | 3.86 |
| P/FCF | 19.04 | 18.49 | 16.21 | 14.70 | 20.95 | 13.21 | 9.95 | 16.46 | 12.36 | 19.40 | 20.64 |
| P/OCF | 17.71 | 17.20 | 15.10 | 13.49 | 18.34 | 12.26 | 9.30 | 14.04 | 10.89 | 16.79 | 17.93 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.55 | 3.58 | 3.10 | 2.66 | 2.68 | 2.77 | 2.81 | 2.49 | 3.07 | 3.24 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.22 | 12.83 | 12.68 | 11.24 | 9.86 | 10.06 | 10.19 | 9.95 | 8.87 | 11.60 | 11.73 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.20 | 13.20 | 12.87 | 11.50 | 10.32 | 10.81 | 11.20 | 10.80 | 9.70 | 12.93 | 13.01 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.20 | 16.15 | 14.96 | 21.81 | 13.74 | 10.56 | 18.24 | 13.83 | 21.48 | 22.53 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.7% | 51.7% | 52.0% | 51.3% | 50.5% | 51.8% | 48.7% | 49.4% | 50.0% | 49.5% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | 25.8% | 26.3% | 25.7% | 24.9% | 24.3% | 24.5% | 25.8% | 25.6% | 23.9% | 25.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 19.7% | 19.7% | 20.4% | 19.8% | 18.8% | 17.8% | 17.5% | 18.6% | 18.2% | 15.1% | 15.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.9% | 17.9% | 19.9% | 21.1% | 20.9% | 20.4% | 17.2% | 21.2% | 22.3% | 19.9% | 21.6% |
| ROA | 12.5% | 12.5% | 13.5% | 13.9% | 13.3% | 12.3% | 10.2% | 12.5% | 12.8% | 11.2% | 11.9% |
| ROIC | 18.1% | 18.1% | 18.8% | 18.9% | 18.7% | 18.4% | 14.9% | 16.9% | 17.5% | 17.3% | 19.0% |
| ROCE | 18.4% | 18.4% | 19.9% | 20.8% | 20.5% | 20.0% | 17.4% | 21.0% | 22.6% | 22.6% | 22.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.38 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 1.02 | 1.54 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.22 | 1.07 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.05 | -0.01 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.21 | -0.21 | -0.05 | 0.20 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.12 | 0.99 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.30 | -0.06 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 1.78 | 1.47 | 2.08 | 1.89 |
| Interest Coverage | 26.56 | 26.56 | 28.68 | 27.61 | 26.53 | 21.47 | 14.94 | 18.50 | 17.98 | 15.39 | 15.41 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.6B) exceeds total debt ($1.3B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.79 | 4.79 | 4.15 | 3.88 | 3.47 | 3.11 | 2.65 | 2.51 | 2.33 | 1.78 | 1.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.68 | 3.68 | 3.17 | 2.81 | 2.40 | 2.29 | 2.01 | 1.71 | 1.62 | 1.24 | 1.37 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.41 | 1.06 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.43 | 2.43 | 2.60 | 2.47 | 2.32 | 2.76 | 2.47 | 2.48 | 2.78 | 2.91 | 3.24 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 113.38 | 110.46 | 107.62 | 108.07 | 105.89 | 130.39 | 129.70 | 127.77 | 126.50 | 123.36 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 45.5% | 45.5% | 38.9% | 35.2% | 34.3% | 33.6% | 38.8% | 31.2% | 28.2% | 30.4% | 27.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.2% | 5.5% | 5.7% | 6.5% | 7.4% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 8.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| FCF Yield | 5.3% | 5.4% | 6.2% | 6.8% | 4.8% | 7.6% | 10.1% | 6.1% | 8.1% | 5.2% | 4.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.1% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 4.2% | 4.1% | 6.0% | 4.5% | 4.8% | 5.7% | 4.5% | 2.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $53M | $54M | $54M | $54M | $55M | $55M | $56M | $57M | $59M | $59M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SNA stock.
Snap-on Incorporated's current P/E ratio is 19.3x. The historical average is 19.9x. This places it at the 79th percentile of its historical range.
Snap-on Incorporated's current EV/EBITDA is 13.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.7x.
Snap-on Incorporated's return on equity (ROE) is 17.9%. The historical average is 15.8%.
Based on historical data, Snap-on Incorporated is trading at a P/E of 19.3x. This is at the 79th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Snap-on Incorporated's current dividend yield is 2.36% with a payout ratio of 45.5%.
Snap-on Incorporated has 51.7% gross margin and 25.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Snap-on Incorporated's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Stagnant revenue growth
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amid Volume Plateau
Despite a 3.6% year-over-year revenue decline in Q2 2026, Snap-on's gross margin expanded to 51.4% from 50.5% in Q1 2024, according to recent SEC filings, underscoring sustained pricing power.
The gross margin expansion suggests the company is successfully passing through input cost inflation to its professional customer base, even as volumes stagnate. However, operating margin contracted to 21.8% from 28.7% over the same period, indicating that SG&A and other overheads are not scaling down with revenue, which may reflect the fixed costs of supporting the franchise network and software R&D. Net margin held at 21.1% in Q2 2026, supported by the high-margin Financial Services segment, but investors should monitor whether operating leverage can recover if revenue growth remains elusive.
Stable Returns Mask Efficiency Gains
Return on invested capital has remained steady around 4.5% quarterly over the past two years, as reported in financial statements, despite a slight decline from 4.9% in Q2 2024, indicating stable capital efficiency.
The stability in ROIC suggests that management's conservative capital allocation—minimal debt and a focus on share repurchases—has not diluted returns, but also that the company is not compounding returns at an accelerating pace. The slight dip in ROIC from 4.9% to 4.5% over the period aligns with the revenue plateau and suggests that incremental capital is being deployed into lower-return financial services receivables rather than higher-return organic growth. Investors should watch whether the shift toward software and diagnostics can lift ROIC over time, as the current level is modest relative to peers like ITW (29.0% ROIC).
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Snap-on's cash conversion cycle lengthened to 222 days in Q2 2026 from 213 days in Q2 2024, according to recent SEC filings, driven by a rise in days sales outstanding to 113 and inventory days to 146.
The elongation of the cash conversion cycle suggests that working capital is absorbing more cash, which may reflect slower collections from franchisees and technicians amid macro turbulence, or deliberate inventory builds to support product availability. Days payable outstanding remained stable at 37, indicating that Snap-on is not stretching suppliers to fund its operations, which is consistent with its fortress balance sheet. The 222-day cycle is exceptionally long, but it is partly a function of the captive finance arm's receivables, which are not separately disclosed; investors should monitor whether this trend signals deteriorating credit quality in the technician base.
Minimal Leverage Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity improved to 0.21 in Q2 2026 from 0.24 in Q1 2024, while interest coverage remained robust at 28.6x, as reported in financial statements, indicating a fortress balance sheet.
The low leverage and high interest coverage suggest that debt service is not a concern, and the company has ample headroom to increase borrowing if needed for acquisitions or share repurchases. However, the flat total debt of $1.3 billion, combined with a $1.6 billion cash pile, implies that management is not aggressively deploying capital, which may be a missed opportunity for growth. The D/EBITDA ratio of 4.35 in Q2 2026 is elevated relative to the 3.35 in Q2 2024, but this is due to lower EBITDA rather than higher debt, and remains manageable given the stable cash flows.
Liquidity Buffer Shields Against Credit Risk
Snap-on's current ratio stood at 3.43 in Q2 2026, down from 4.79 in Q4 2025 but still robust, according to recent SEC filings, with cash reserves of $1.6 billion providing a cushion.
The current ratio remains strong, but the decline from 4.79 to 3.43 over two quarters suggests that working capital is being deployed, possibly into receivables or inventory. The quick ratio of 2.64 indicates that even without inventory, the company can cover short-term obligations, which is reassuring given the potential for rising credit defaults in the technician base. The liquidity position appears adequate to absorb a moderate increase in provisioning for loan losses, but investors should monitor delinquency trends in the captive finance portfolio, as a severe downturn could strain this buffer.
Misapplied P/E Overlooks Captive Finance
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Snap-on is the P/E multiple, which fails to separate the high-margin Financial Services segment from the cyclical manufacturing business, according to recent filings, obscuring the true earnings power.
A simple P/E of 21.4x may appear reasonable, but it blends the stable, recurring-like income from financing and software subscriptions with the more volatile tool sales. Investors should instead use a sum-of-the-parts valuation, applying a higher multiple to the Financial Services and Repair Systems & Information segments, which exhibit more predictable cash flows, and a lower multiple to the Tools Group. Alternatively, EV/EBITDA of 14.7x provides a cleaner comparison, but it still does not isolate the credit risk embedded in the finance receivables. Adjusting for the provision for credit losses and segment-level margins would offer a more accurate picture of Snap-on's intrinsic value.