Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.6x · EV/EBITDA 7.0x · ROE 8.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $48M | $114M | $80M | $30M | $29M | $69M | $90M | $87M | $104M | $116M | $91M |
| Enterprise Value | $26M | $92M | $60M | $16M | $15M | $44M | $67M | $56M | $65M | $94M | $72M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.57 | 34.50 | 31.27 | — | 7.88 | 10.64 | 250.32 | 37.84 | 34.23 | — | 84.50 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.31 | 3.13 | 2.24 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 1.98 | 2.69 | 2.47 | 1.12 | 1.81 | 1.35 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.11 | 2.64 | 2.13 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 1.93 | 1.33 | 0.99 | 1.25 | 1.40 | 1.12 |
| P/FCF | 39.79 | 95.25 | 12.56 | — | — | 13.65 | 62.30 | — | 21.14 | — | 11.28 |
| P/OCF | 27.12 | 64.91 | 12.05 | 115.65 | — | 11.47 | 38.77 | — | 14.15 | — | 10.23 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.53 | 1.69 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 1.26 | 2.00 | 1.59 | 0.70 | 1.46 | 1.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.00 | 25.00 | 13.06 | — | 5.30 | 14.92 | 13.32 | 20.70 | 10.83 | 148.51 | 22.17 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.58 | 28.56 | 15.52 | — | 10.40 | 40.71 | 21.86 | 94.24 | 13.53 | — | 40.64 |
| EV / FCF | — | 77.04 | 9.44 | — | — | 8.68 | 46.28 | — | 13.25 | — | 8.85 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.5% | 65.5% | 64.1% | 57.5% | 60.5% | 63.0% | 66.3% | 61.8% | 43.5% | 48.7% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 10.9% | -3.9% | 4.2% | 3.1% | 9.2% | 1.7% | 4.1% | -1.9% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.8% | 8.8% | 7.4% | -3.9% | 10.8% | 18.4% | 1.1% | 6.5% | 3.2% | -10.8% | 1.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.0% | 8.0% | 7.0% | -3.4% | 10.4% | 12.5% | 0.5% | 2.7% | 3.6% | -8.4% | 1.5% |
| ROA | 6.0% | 6.0% | 5.2% | -2.5% | 6.9% | 7.7% | 0.3% | 1.9% | 2.5% | -6.3% | 1.1% |
| ROIC | 11.5% | 11.5% | 14.2% | -4.0% | 6.5% | 3.0% | 4.5% | 0.9% | 5.4% | -1.5% | 2.5% |
| ROCE | 7.1% | 7.1% | 9.7% | -3.1% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 3.5% | 0.6% | 4.3% | -1.5% | 2.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.12 | — | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 1.28 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.50 | -0.53 | -0.37 | -0.37 | -0.70 | -0.34 | -0.35 | -0.47 | -0.27 | -0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -5.91 | -5.91 | -4.31 | — | -4.78 | -8.53 | -4.61 | -11.56 | -6.44 | -35.54 | -6.09 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -18.21 | -3.12 | — | — | -4.96 | -16.02 | — | -7.89 | — | -2.43 |
| Interest Coverage | 22.25 | 22.25 | 37.34 | -8.06 | 5.44 | 20.79 | 19.20 | 3.50 | 11.65 | -3.56 | 5.90 |
Net cash position: cash ($22M) exceeds total debt ($558000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.52 | 4.52 | 3.08 | 3.41 | 3.35 | 2.17 | 2.35 | 3.31 | 2.89 | 3.27 | 3.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.90 | 3.90 | 2.68 | 2.70 | 2.55 | 1.88 | 1.97 | 2.88 | 2.46 | 2.90 | 3.44 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.49 | 2.49 | 1.66 | 1.48 | 1.43 | 1.37 | 0.74 | 1.76 | 1.61 | 1.89 | 2.38 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.64 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.24 | 2.24 | 2.59 | 1.94 | 1.66 | 2.25 | 0.90 | 1.07 | 3.77 | 3.44 | 5.07 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 109.59 | 120.63 | 128.58 | 113.61 | 95.14 | 87.78 | 310.92 | 85.61 | 123.73 | 99.82 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 58.0% | 27.8% | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 625.2% | 6944.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.9% | 2.9% | 3.2% | — | 12.7% | 9.4% | 0.4% | 2.6% | 2.9% | — | 1.2% |
| FCF Yield | 2.5% | 1.0% | 8.0% | — | — | 7.3% | 1.6% | — | 4.7% | — | 8.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 58.0% | 27.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $24M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $18M |
Geopolitical and project lumpiness
Based on reported figures, SNT trades at a P/E of 14.57 and an EV/EBITDA of 7.00, suggesting that the market assigns a significant discount to the firm's earnings potential compared to broader security technology peers like OSI Systems, which command substantially higher valuation multiples.
The current valuation appears to bake in a lack of organic growth momentum, as the PEG ratio of 0.26 indicates that the market is not pricing in any meaningful acceleration in earnings. Investors should monitor whether this discount is a structural response to the company's stagnant revenue profile or an opportunity arising from the market's failure to value the firm's high-margin, product-centric pivot.
As reported in financial statements, SNT's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, peaking at 6.7% in 2024Q3 before contracting to -0.6% in 2025Q4, which highlights the difficulty of compounding returns in a business model heavily dependent on the timing of large-scale, lumpy infrastructure project completions.
The inconsistency in ROIC suggests that the firm's capital allocation is currently struggling to generate sustained value above its cost of capital. This volatility warrants further investigation into whether the recent divestiture of the lower-margin integration division will eventually stabilize returns as the product-focused model matures.
According to recent quarterly data, SNT's cash conversion cycle reached 218 days in 2025Q4, driven by a high DIO of 152 days and a DSO of 124 days, indicating that the firm's operational efficiency is constrained by long inventory holding periods and delayed customer payments.
These elevated metrics suggest that SNT's working capital management is heavily influenced by the long lead times inherent in high-security infrastructure projects. Investors should monitor whether the company can optimize its inventory turnover as it shifts further toward a standardized product model, as current levels appear inefficient compared to more agile technology peers.
Based on SNT's reported figures, the company maintains a robust liquidity position with a current ratio of 4.52 as of 2025Q4, providing a substantial buffer against operational shocks despite the inherent volatility of its project-based revenue streams and the lack of significant debt obligations.
The firm's negligible debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 underscores a conservative financial strategy that prioritizes solvency over leverage-driven growth. This liquidity profile appears sufficient to navigate potential geopolitical disruptions or delays in government procurement cycles without requiring external financing.
As indicated by an analysis of the provided data, the P/E ratio is a fundamentally flawed metric for SNT, as it obscures the company's massive cash-to-market-cap ratio and fails to account for the non-operating earnings volatility inherent in its current project-based revenue recognition model.
Investors should prioritize EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to better capture the firm's true earning power, as the headline P/E is distorted by the idle cash pile and the lack of consistent recurring revenue. Relying on P/E risks misinterpreting the company's valuation by ignoring the significant cash cushion that effectively lowers the enterprise's true cost of acquisition.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SNT stock.
Senstar Technologies Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 14.6x. The historical average is 23.8x. This places it at the 38th percentile of its historical range.
Senstar Technologies Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.8x.
Senstar Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.0%. The historical average is 1.0%.
Based on historical data, Senstar Technologies Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 14.6x. This is at the 38th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Senstar Technologies Ltd. has 65.5% gross margin and 8.3% operating margin.
Senstar Technologies Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.