Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 38.1x · EV/EBITDA 37.8x · ROE 31.9%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $124.0B | $122.2B | $92.6B | $36.6B | $15.5B | $45.4B | $59.0B | $27.1B | $20.6B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $120.3B | $118.9B | $89.9B | $35.2B | $14.7B | $44.4B | $58.5B | $26.6B | $19.7B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 38.14 | 55.25 | 81.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.91 | 7.11 | 5.91 | 2.76 | 1.32 | 4.69 | 7.49 | 4.00 | 3.91 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 13.67 | 14.68 | 16.76 | 14.50 | 6.44 | 21.42 | 21.04 | 13.29 | 9.82 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 34.80 | 42.56 | 40.54 | 54.29 | 736.29 | 164.45 | 326.10 | 61.79 | 93.91 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 37.91 | 41.68 | 40.24 | 53.81 | 336.13 | 125.73 | 227.90 | 47.23 | 59.79 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.92 | 5.74 | 2.66 | 1.25 | 4.60 | 7.42 | 3.94 | 3.74 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.78 | 51.71 | 60.50 | — | — | 201.02 | — | 1901.40 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 49.09 | 52.75 | 65.29 | — | — | 153.72 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 41.41 | 39.36 | 52.19 | 698.19 | 160.96 | 322.93 | 60.78 | 89.85 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 32.0% | 30.1% | 25.6% | 25.0% | 26.8% | 25.6% | 25.5% | 25.7% | 20.8% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.8% | 12.8% | 8.7% | -3.4% | -5.6% | 1.0% | -3.7% | -1.1% | -0.8% | -9.2% | -11.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.9% | 12.9% | 7.3% | -4.0% | -3.7% | -0.4% | -7.4% | -2.7% | -1.5% | -30.2% | -18.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 31.9% | 31.9% | 28.3% | -21.6% | -19.0% | -1.4% | -24.0% | -9.0% | -6.7% | -518.9% | — |
| ROA | 16.4% | 16.4% | 11.2% | -6.7% | -5.8% | -0.5% | -10.2% | -3.9% | -2.1% | -47.4% | -34.2% |
| ROIC | 42.0% | 42.0% | 52.2% | -24.7% | -35.9% | 4.2% | -11.5% | -3.9% | -3.4% | -68.9% | -223.7% |
| ROCE | 26.7% | 26.7% | 23.1% | -10.6% | -16.3% | 2.6% | -9.6% | -3.0% | -2.5% | -35.5% | -61.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.84 | 0.21 | 0.31 | — | 3.97 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.40 | — | — | 8.06 | — | 44.43 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.40 | -0.49 | -0.56 | -0.33 | -0.45 | -0.20 | -0.22 | -0.43 | 1.97 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.44 | -1.44 | -1.82 | — | — | -4.36 | — | -31.64 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.15 | -1.18 | -2.10 | -38.10 | -3.49 | -3.17 | -1.01 | -4.07 | 3.52 | 4.82 |
| Interest Coverage | 72.74 | 72.74 | 38.25 | -12.29 | -8.02 | 7.22 | -13.04 | -2.08 | -27.83 | -2.42 | -106.00 |
Net cash position: cash ($5.3B) exceeds total debt ($2.0B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.88 | 1.29 | 1.24 | 1.36 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 1.56 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.88 | 1.29 | 1.24 | 1.36 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 1.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.67 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 1.08 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.14 | 1.31 | 1.59 | 1.54 | 1.35 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 1.41 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 19.50 | 18.61 | 24.19 | 21.63 | 23.63 | 21.68 | 21.91 | 27.90 | 32.13 | 37.84 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.6% | 1.8% | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.9% | 2.3% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.3% | 1.6% | 1.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 1.6% | 0.4% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 1.6% | 0.4% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $211M | $207M | $195M | $196M | $194M | $188M | $181M | $181M | $178M | $168M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SPOT stock.
Spotify Technology S.A.'s current P/E ratio is 38.1x. The historical average is 68.3x.
Spotify Technology S.A.'s current EV/EBITDA is 37.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 56.1x.
Spotify Technology S.A.'s return on equity (ROE) is 31.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -13.6%.
Based on historical data, Spotify Technology S.A. is trading at a P/E of 38.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Spotify Technology S.A. has 32.0% gross margin and 12.8% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Spotify Technology S.A.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Rich multiple vs decelerating growth
Premium Multiple On Decelerating Growth
At a 49.6x trailing P/E and 45.3x EV/EBITDA versus SiriusXM's 12.3x and 9.2x, Spotify's valuation appears to demand sustained double-digit margin expansion, yet per the latest reported figures, revenue growth has slipped to single-digit territory excluding the anomalous 2026Q3 print.
The 48.6x forward P/E implies the market is pricing in continued operating margin progression from the current 13.5%, but with operating margin having already compressed from its 15.8% peak in 2026Q1 to 13.5% in 2026Q3, the earnings trajectory underwriting this multiple looks fragile. The P/FCF of 37.3x is meaningfully lower than the P/E, suggesting cash generation is stronger than accrual earnings imply, yet even that premium requires Spotify to sustain its recent cash conversion while the ad-supported segment faces cyclical exposure to digital ad budgets.
Gross Margin Plateau Caps Earnings Quality
Gross margin has expanded 370 basis points from 29.2% in 2024Q2 to 32.9% in 2026Q3, yet the pace of improvement has stalled in the 32-33% range since mid-2025, according to Spotify's reported quarterly figures, suggesting the structural royalty ceiling imposed by major labels may be reasserting itself.
The operating margin more than doubled from 7.0% to 15.8% over the period, but has since retreated to 13.5% by 2026Q3, which appears consistent with rising content acquisition costs or elevated investment spending ahead of the reported earnings date. Net margin remains volatile—swinging from -2.1% in 2025Q2 to 25.9% in 2025Q4 before settling at 10.4%—indicating non-operating distortions that make reported profitability a noisy indicator of underlying earning power; adjusted operating margin, which strips out FX and one-off effects, is likely the more reliable measure of true run-rate profitability here.
ROIC Decoupling Signals Improving Efficiency
ROIC has climbed to 17.8% in 2026Q3 from 11.0% in 2024Q2, far outpacing both ROE at 6.5% and ROA at 4.0%, per Spotify's disclosed figures, suggesting the company is generating increasingly attractive returns on invested capital without relying on financial leverage.
The unusually wide gap between ROIC and ROE reflects Spotify's near-zero debt posture—D/E of 0.05 in 2026Q3—which mechanically suppresses equity returns while confirming that the return improvement is driven by margin expansion and rising asset turnover (0.38, up from 0.30) rather than balance sheet engineering. However, the ROIC trajectory was not monotonic, dropping from 18.3% in 2024Q3 to 8.5% in 2025Q2 before recovering, indicating that capital efficiency remains sensitive to content investment timing and that recent gains may not yet represent a durable compounding trend.
Near-Zero Leverage Eliminates Refinancing Risk
Debt-to-equity collapsed from 0.42 in 2024Q2 to just 0.05 in 2026Q3, with interest coverage soaring to 96x from 31x over the same period, as reported in Spotify's balance sheet disclosures, indicating that debt service constraints are effectively non-existent in the current configuration.
This deleveraging trajectory has occurred alongside a more than doubling of operating margin, meaning Spotify's capacity to service obligations has expanded on both the numerator and denominator simultaneously—a rare and structurally favorable combination. The D/EBITDA ratio of 0.63x in 2026Q3, down from over 6x in 2024Q2, confirms that leverage is now negligible on an earnings-cash-flow basis; the risk to monitor is not solvency but whether management redeploy the freed-up balance sheet capacity into lower-return content commitments or opportunistic capital returns, either of which could alter the currently conservative risk profile.
Current Ratio Reflects Subscription Prepayment Strength
The current ratio has improved to 2.13 in 2026Q3 from 1.47 in 2025Q2, with quick ratio identical at 2.13, reflecting the absence of inventory dependence in Spotify's asset-light model, according to the company's reported liquidity metrics.
The absence of any gap between current and quick ratios confirms that working capital is dominated by cash receivables rather than physical stock, which materially reduces the risk of inventory obsolescence or write-downs under stress scenarios. DSO of 15-17 days and DPO of 24-30 days indicate a structurally negative cash conversion cycle—Spotify collects from subscribers faster than it pays content providers—providing an inherent working capital funding advantage that would likely persist even under revenue pressure, though the declining DPO trend from 30 to 24 days may warrant monitoring for any shift in label payment terms.
P/E Ratio Misleads On Volatile Earnings Base
The trailing P/E of 49.6x is the most commonly misapplied metric for Spotify, because net margin has oscillated between -2.1% and 25.9% over the last eight quarters per reported figures, rendering the denominator structurally unreliable for valuation purposes in both directions.
Given that operating cash flow has exceeded net income in nine of the last ten quarters, the P/FCF ratio of 37.3x or EV/EBITDA of 45.3x provides a cleaner lens on Spotify's true cash-generating capacity than the P/E, which is distorted by non-operating FX swings and equity award timing. A more appropriate framing would anchor on EV/Sales against growth-adjusted peer averages or on normalized free cash flow yield, since the current P/E-based premium risks overstating valuation support during quarters where non-operating gains inflate reported earnings and understating it during quarters of FX-driven losses.