Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.0x · EV/EBITDA 1.0x · ROE 4.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $777M | $646M | $691M | $464M | $321M | $217M | $536M | $333M | $805M | $636M |
| Enterprise Value | $281M | $-117910140 | $27M | $438M | $764M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $5.1B | $5.0B | $5.0B | $7.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.96 | 7.99 | 4.88 | 4.64 | 5.97 | 39.25 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.24 | 0.82 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 0.43 | 0.27 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.54 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.16 |
| P/FCF | 10.84 | 7.16 | 1.65 | 1.12 | 2.52 | 5.88 | 0.23 | 1.96 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 3.90 | 2.58 | 1.38 | 1.10 | 2.33 | 4.22 | 0.22 | 1.40 | 1.83 | 1.57 | 1.02 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.12 | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.64 | 1.80 | 0.60 | 2.64 | 2.91 | 2.65 | 3.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.96 | -0.40 | 0.06 | 0.70 | 2.22 | — | 5.39 | 113.27 | 11.30 | 10.12 | 7.43 |
| EV / EBIT | 1.36 | -0.34 | 0.06 | 0.79 | 3.06 | — | 15.44 | — | 23.03 | — | 18.02 |
| EV / FCF | — | -1.09 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 4.16 | 22.51 | 1.13 | 18.51 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 27.5% | 32.3% | 39.6% | 24.6% | -7.3% | 30.8% | 24.3% | 18.7% | 20.7% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | 21.8% | 29.9% | 36.3% | 20.6% | -27.2% | 3.9% | -5.7% | 9.6% | 0.4% | 16.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.3% | 10.3% | 11.0% | 10.3% | 6.6% | 1.1% | -4.6% | -16.2% | -4.6% | -8.7% | -5.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.8% | 4.8% | 7.2% | 9.5% | 4.1% | 0.3% | -3.3% | -11.4% | -2.8% | -4.7% | -3.2% |
| ROA | 4.3% | 4.3% | 6.2% | 6.9% | 1.8% | 0.1% | -1.1% | -3.8% | -1.0% | -1.6% | -1.0% |
| ROIC | 12.0% | 12.0% | 19.1% | 24.8% | 7.4% | -4.2% | 1.0% | -1.1% | 1.7% | 0.1% | 2.7% |
| ROCE | 9.7% | 9.7% | 18.1% | 26.9% | 9.6% | -4.0% | 1.1% | -1.5% | 2.3% | 0.1% | 3.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 1.90 | 1.77 | 1.61 | 1.72 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 1.77 | — | 4.95 | 109.19 | 11.50 | 9.39 | 7.36 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.41 | -0.32 | -0.14 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 1.76 | 1.62 | 1.45 | 1.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.05 | -3.05 | -1.35 | -0.40 | 0.87 | — | 4.31 | 101.29 | 10.54 | 8.49 | 6.76 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -8.25 | -1.58 | -0.41 | 1.63 | 16.63 | 0.91 | 16.55 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 120.96 | 120.96 | 54.30 | 19.91 | 6.47 | -3.13 | 0.79 | -1.75 | 0.85 | -0.79 | 1.39 |
Net cash position: cash ($941M) exceeds total debt ($46M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.89 | 8.89 | 6.99 | 5.33 | 3.55 | 1.54 | 0.76 | 0.98 | 1.31 | 0.61 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio | 8.67 | 8.67 | 6.65 | 5.03 | 3.28 | 1.52 | 0.76 | 0.98 | 1.31 | 0.61 | 0.78 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.23 | 7.23 | 5.41 | 3.78 | 2.24 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.44 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.10 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | 23.40 | 23.40 | 17.97 | 16.62 | 14.75 | 14.93 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 51.96 | 42.15 | 46.80 | 68.62 | 55.86 | 38.90 | 58.30 | 77.69 | 51.90 | 46.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.3% | 11.0% | 13.2% | — | — | 23.5% | 14.6% | 1.0% | 6.6% | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 86.9% | 86.9% | 63.6% | — | — | 964.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.4% | 12.5% | 20.5% | 21.5% | 16.7% | 2.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 9.2% | 14.0% | 60.6% | 89.7% | 39.6% | 17.0% | 440.7% | 51.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.6% | 18.0% | 8.0% | 4.5% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 4.8% | 100.0% | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.7% | 11.6% | 31.1% | 8.0% | 4.5% | 25.0% | 14.6% | 5.8% | 100.0% | 4.8% | 2.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $86M | $93M | $97M | $102M | $102M | $101M | $101M | $100M | $86M | $79M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TK stock.
Teekay Corporation's current P/E ratio is 12.0x. The historical average is 15.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Teekay Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 1.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.8x.
Teekay Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 4.8%. The historical average is 4.4%.
Based on historical data, Teekay Corporation is trading at a P/E of 12.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Teekay Corporation's current dividend yield is 7.33% with a payout ratio of 86.9%.
Teekay Corporation has 27.5% gross margin and 21.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Teekay Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue contraction and fleet aging
Deep Discount Masks Cyclical Peak
Trading at 0.88x EV/EBITDA and 0.53x book value, Teekay's valuation implies the market is pricing in a sharp cyclical downturn, despite a 57.6% gross margin in 2026Q2 per reported figures.
The trailing P/E of 11.72 is misleading because it captures a rate spike that may not persist; the forward P/E of 59.91 suggests the market expects earnings to normalize sharply. The 0.53x P/B and 0.88x EV/EBITDA are far below peers like Frontline (3.86x P/B, 13.59x EV/EBITDA), indicating a holding-company discount or skepticism about the sustainability of current cash flows. Investors should monitor whether the discount narrows as management deploys its $941M cash pile, as the current valuation appears to price in minimal value for that liquidity.
Rate Spike Distorts Margin Quality
Gross margin jumped to 57.6% in 2026Q2 from 35.4% a year earlier, per financial statements, but net margin of 17.6% is far lower, suggesting non-operating charges are masking true earning power.
The operating margin of 55.3% in 2026Q2 reflects extreme operating leverage in a high-rate environment, but this is not a stable run-rate; historical margins have swung widely, with operating margin as low as 19.1% in 2024Q3. The gap between operating income ($368M) and net income ($117M) in 2026Q2 indicates significant non-operating losses, possibly from impairments or equity method investments, which investors should adjust for when assessing recurring profitability. The 7.5% dividend yield may be unsustainable if rates normalize, as the payout appears tied to cyclical cash flows.
ROIC Surge Reflects Cyclicality, Not Compounding
ROIC spiked to 17.9% in 2026Q2 from 3.2% a year earlier, per reported figures, but the 10-quarter trend shows extreme volatility, indicating returns are rate-driven rather than structurally improving.
The average ROIC over the past ten quarters is roughly 6%, with a low of 2.8% in 2024Q3, highlighting that the current 17.9% is a cyclical peak. ROE of 5.1% in 2026Q2 is modest relative to peers like Frontline (36%) and International Seaways (37%), partly because Teekay holds a large cash balance that depresses equity returns. The company's returns are highly sensitive to tanker spot rates, and the aging fleet may require significant capex that could erode future returns if not deployed efficiently.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves with Rates
Cash conversion cycle improved to 19 days in 2026Q2 from 62 days in 2024Q2, per financial statements, driven by faster receivables collection and lower inventory days, reflecting tighter working capital management.
DSO fell to 17 days in 2026Q2 from 52 days a year earlier, suggesting improved collection from charterers, while DPO remained low at 10 days, indicating limited supplier leverage. The asset turnover of 0.25x is low, typical for capital-intensive shipping, but the high current ratio of 10.36x indicates that cash is not being deployed efficiently into revenue-generating assets. The sharp improvement in CCC is likely tied to the rate spike and may reverse as rates normalize, so investors should monitor whether working capital efficiency persists.
Near-Zero Debt Provides Unmatched Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.02 with interest coverage of 303x in 2026Q2, per reported figures, giving Teekay a fortress balance sheet that far exceeds levered peers like Frontline (1.22 D/E).
Total debt of $37.5M against $791.4M cash means the company is net cash, and the negligible leverage eliminates refinancing risk and interest expense pressure. This positions Teekay to withstand a severe tanker downturn or to fund counter-cyclical acquisitions, but the lack of debt also means the company is not using leverage to amplify returns, which may explain the lower ROE relative to peers. The high cash balance could be a target for activist investors if management does not deploy it effectively.
Liquidity Buffer at Historic Highs
Current ratio of 10.36 and quick ratio of 10.10 in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, provide a substantial cushion against market shocks, far exceeding peer averages.
With $791.4M in cash and minimal debt, Teekay's liquidity position is exceptionally strong, allowing it to cover near-term obligations many times over. However, the aging fleet may require significant capital expenditures, and the 22.19% revenue contraction in the prior year suggests that cash could be consumed by fleet renewal or operational needs. The high liquidity also implies that the company is not earning a return on its cash, which may drag on overall returns if not deployed.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Cyclical Peak
The trailing P/E of 11.72 is commonly misapplied to Teekay because it capitalizes a cyclical earnings spike, obscuring the normalized earning power and the value of the $941M cash pile.
In shipping, P/E ratios are unreliable due to extreme earnings volatility; a better metric is EV/EBITDA or price-to-book, which better capture asset value and cash generation. Teekay's EV/EBITDA of 0.88x is far below peers, suggesting the market is pricing in a severe downturn or a holding-company discount. Investors should use a sum-of-the-parts valuation that separately values the tanker fleet, the Marine Services business, and the net cash position, rather than relying on a single earnings multiple.