Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.6x · EV/EBITDA 10.5x · ROE 252.0%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.0B | $2.8B | $4.5B | $6.8B | $4.3B | $6.4B | $5.5B | $4.0B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.6B | $3.5B | $5.2B | $7.6B | $4.5B | $6.3B | $5.6B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $3.3B | $2.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.65 | 18.71 | 26.46 | 18.07 | 12.09 | 18.79 | 20.15 | 18.93 | 15.77 | 17.81 | 30.14 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.90 | 1.38 | 0.89 | 1.41 | 1.36 | 1.04 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.60 |
| P/B Ratio | 57.99 | 52.56 | 65.78 | 86.91 | 5.60 | 7.24 | 9.03 | 8.46 | 8.09 | 15.37 | 53.31 |
| P/FCF | 9.79 | 9.28 | 22.58 | 14.42 | 8.58 | 35.86 | 10.75 | 9.44 | — | 14.72 | 17.58 |
| P/OCF | 9.88 | 9.37 | 16.27 | 12.44 | 7.72 | 29.28 | 10.04 | 8.53 | — | 12.51 | 12.76 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.70 | 1.03 | 1.55 | 0.93 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.55 | 10.10 | 13.91 | 12.93 | 7.72 | 12.29 | 13.52 | 9.82 | 11.06 | 13.01 | 13.30 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.37 | 12.80 | 18.06 | 14.10 | 8.71 | 13.70 | 14.06 | 9.88 | 12.82 | 14.99 | 16.99 |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.42 | 25.87 | 16.23 | 8.97 | 35.49 | 11.00 | 7.24 | — | 15.13 | 20.20 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.7% | 17.7% | 18.8% | 22.4% | 22.9% | 20.6% | 19.7% | 17.7% | 19.0% | 18.2% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.7% | 9.5% | 10.2% | 10.0% | 9.1% | 7.0% | 7.2% | 6.6% | 4.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.4% | 7.6% | 7.3% | 7.4% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | 2.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 252.0% | 252.0% | 235.4% | 87.9% | 42.9% | 45.4% | 50.3% | 49.9% | 66.1% | 148.0% | 287.8% |
| ROA | 3.9% | 3.9% | 4.4% | 10.5% | 10.5% | 10.6% | 9.4% | 8.2% | 7.6% | 7.6% | 2.9% |
| ROIC | 28.4% | 28.4% | 26.0% | 37.0% | 41.8% | 44.0% | 201.5% | 410.2% | 44.1% | 54.0% | 28.6% |
| ROCE | 23.8% | 23.8% | 24.3% | 34.9% | 33.0% | 33.2% | 32.3% | 25.3% | 27.2% | 28.0% | 18.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 17.44 | 17.44 | 14.81 | 14.58 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.96 | 1.10 | 2.05 | 13.27 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.72 | 2.72 | 2.73 | 1.93 | 0.94 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 1.45 | 1.42 | 1.69 | 2.88 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 12.13 | 9.59 | 10.90 | 0.26 | -0.07 | 0.21 | -1.97 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 7.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.89 | 1.89 | 1.77 | 1.44 | 0.34 | -0.13 | 0.31 | -2.98 | 0.64 | 0.35 | 1.73 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.14 | 3.29 | 1.81 | 0.39 | -0.37 | 0.25 | -2.20 | — | 0.40 | 2.62 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.88 | 4.88 | 4.65 | 13.53 | 13.36 | 23.05 | 19.00 | 14.86 | 11.41 | 10.85 | 6.24 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 1.16 | 1.14 | 1.16 | 1.13 | 1.11 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.38 | 1.14 | 0.46 | 1.30 | 1.11 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.43 | 0.19 | 0.89 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.32 | 1.23 | 1.33 | 1.42 | 1.37 | 1.33 | 1.40 | 1.44 | 1.26 | 1.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.23 | — | 2.87 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 20.69 | 27.52 | 34.48 | 29.44 | 27.25 | 23.89 | 27.83 | 32.82 | 35.44 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 33.5% | 33.5% | 21.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.8% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 5.5% | 8.3% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 5.3% | 6.3% | 5.6% | 3.3% |
| FCF Yield | 10.2% | 10.8% | 4.4% | 6.9% | 11.7% | 2.8% | 9.3% | 10.6% | — | 6.8% | 5.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.1% | 6.4% | 4.0% | 16.6% | 12.1% | 1.5% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 3.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.8% | 8.3% | 4.8% | 16.6% | 12.1% | 1.5% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 3.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $48M | $50M | $57M | $64M | $67M | $68M | $71M | $72M | $71M | $72M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TNET stock.
TriNet Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 20.6x. The historical average is 31.9x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
TriNet Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.0x.
TriNet Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 252.0%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 150.7%.
Based on historical data, TriNet Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 20.6x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TriNet Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.66% with a payout ratio of 33.5%.
TriNet Group, Inc. has 17.7% gross margin and 5.4% operating margin.
TriNet Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent revenue contraction
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Revenue Decline
According to reported financials, TriNet's operating margin rebounded to 7.5% in 2026Q2 from a trough of 1.2% in 2025Q4, yet revenue contracted 4.8% YoY, suggesting cost discipline rather than top-line strength.
The gross margin swing from 13.7% in 2025Q4 to 20.9% in 2026Q2 highlights the volatility inherent in insurance pass-throughs, with claims experience and reserve adjustments driving quarterly fluctuations. Operating margin expansion to 7.5% appears driven by flat SG&A against lower revenue, but the thin absolute margin leaves limited buffer for adverse claims or regulatory changes. Investors should monitor whether this margin improvement is sustainable or a one-off benefit from reserve releases, as the prior quarter's 11.1% operating margin was not maintained.
ROIC Volatility Reflects Equity Base Distortions
Based on reported figures, TriNet's ROIC swung from 1.6% in 2025Q4 to 14.6% in 2026Q1, while ROE reached 129.9% in the same quarter, per financial statements, indicating extreme sensitivity to a thin equity base.
The equity base has been eroded by cumulative losses, with retained earnings at -$1.0B, causing ROE to spike artificially when net income turns positive. ROIC, though less distorted, still shows wide swings from 2.4% in 2024Q4 to 14.6% in 2026Q1, reflecting the lumpy nature of insurance reserve adjustments. This volatility suggests that single-period return metrics are unreliable for assessing TriNet's true capital efficiency; a multi-year average or normalized earnings approach would provide a clearer picture of compounding or decay.
Working Capital Efficiency Masked by Float
As reported in financial statements, TriNet's current ratio improved to 1.13 in 2026Q2 from 1.04 in 2024Q2, but DSO rose to 34 days from 33, and DPO remained low at 9 days, indicating limited supplier leverage.
The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to unavailable DIO data, but the low DPO relative to DSO suggests TriNet pays suppliers faster than it collects from clients, a typical feature of the PEO model where payroll and insurance premiums are passed through. The asset turnover ratio has been stable at 0.33-0.35, reflecting the asset-light model, but the working capital swings in cash flow (from -$232M to +$508M) indicate that insurance reserve timing dominates quarterly efficiency metrics. This implies that operational efficiency is better assessed over a full year rather than quarterly, as the float and reserve adjustments create noise.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Shrinks
Per financial statements, TriNet's debt-to-equity ratio rose to 7.60 in 2026Q2 from 7.93 in 2024Q1, but interest coverage improved to 6.29 from 6.06, per reported data, suggesting debt service remains manageable despite a shrinking equity base.
Total debt has remained near $950M while equity has fluctuated between $54M and $143M, causing the D/E ratio to be highly volatile and not directly comparable to peers with more stable capital structures. The D/EBITDA ratio of 8.72 in 2026Q2 is elevated relative to the prior year's 11.05, but still below the 28.55 peak in 2025Q4, indicating that EBITDA recovery has reduced leverage from a stress point. Interest coverage of 6.29 provides a comfortable cushion, but the thin operating margin of 7.5% means a modest decline in profitability could quickly erode coverage, warranting close monitoring of claims experience and revenue trends.
Liquidity Buffer Thin but Improving
According to reported balance sheet data, TriNet's current ratio improved to 1.13 in 2026Q2 from 1.04 in 2024Q2, with cash at $358M, but the quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating no inventory dependence.
The liquidity position appears adequate for normal operations, but the thin margin above 1.0 suggests limited cushion against a severe claims event or a sudden client headcount reduction. The cash balance of $358M, combined with $1.98B in total cash per the company intelligence, provides a buffer, but the volatility in operating cash flow (from -$232M to +$508M in working capital swings) indicates that liquidity can tighten quickly. Investors should stress-test the balance sheet under a scenario of rising medical costs and continued revenue contraction, as the current ratio may not hold if insurance reserves require additional funding.
P/E Misleading for Risk Aggregator
The most commonly misapplied ratio for TriNet is the P/E multiple, which at 22.30 TTM appears reasonable, but the forward P/E of 14.19 implies a sharp earnings recovery that may not materialize given revenue contraction.
TriNet's earnings are heavily influenced by insurance reserve releases and claims experience, making net income a volatile and potentially misleading measure of underlying value. The P/E ratio fails to capture the risk aggregation aspect of the business, where adverse selection in the insurance pool can cause sudden earnings misses. Instead, investors should focus on the net insurance margin and the spread between premiums and claims, as well as the stability of professional services revenue, which represents the true 'SaaS-like' value. An EV/EBITDA multiple, at 11.24, provides a more stable comparison, but even that requires adjustment for reserve changes to reflect sustainable cash generation.