Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -160.0%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17M | $16M | $21M | $20M | $10M | $29M | $86M | $14M | $15M | $12M | $33M |
| Enterprise Value | $20M | $19M | $23M | $21M | $7M | $25M | $82M | $19M | $18M | $14M | $32M |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.15 | — | — | — | — | — | 19.87 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.04 | 2.78 | 2.71 | 2.72 | 1.16 | 3.73 | 3.43 | 2.16 | 2.66 | 2.43 | 5.13 |
| P/B Ratio | 26.93 | 26.62 | 5.12 | 2.40 | 0.85 | 2.13 | 6.49 | 15.42 | 4.95 | 2.25 | 3.95 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.52 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.72 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.37 | 3.01 | 2.82 | 0.80 | 3.17 | 3.28 | 2.98 | 3.19 | 2.71 | 4.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.10 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.17 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.62 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.6% | 54.6% | 46.0% | 58.3% | 60.7% | 59.2% | 60.1% | 61.7% | 55.8% | 61.4% | 58.8% |
| Operating Margin | -68.4% | -68.4% | -53.0% | -45.5% | -34.6% | -63.5% | 18.0% | -32.8% | -55.0% | -69.0% | -53.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -66.5% | -66.5% | -57.8% | -46.3% | -34.5% | -57.2% | 17.5% | -36.2% | -57.8% | -72.9% | -49.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -160.0% | -160.0% | -71.9% | -34.4% | -23.0% | -33.1% | 62.3% | -118.3% | -77.0% | -53.4% | -33.8% |
| ROA | -44.8% | -44.8% | -38.8% | -23.6% | -18.1% | -26.8% | 35.1% | -25.1% | -28.7% | -33.5% | -29.9% |
| ROIC | -55.8% | -55.8% | -39.7% | -28.7% | -24.5% | -39.5% | 43.5% | -25.9% | -36.1% | -36.7% | -42.8% |
| ROCE | -71.1% | -71.1% | -44.9% | -28.5% | -21.6% | -33.9% | 54.7% | -40.4% | -31.1% | -35.2% | -36.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.82 | 5.82 | 0.73 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 6.86 | 1.66 | 1.10 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.27 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 5.67 | 0.57 | 0.09 | -0.26 | -0.32 | -0.28 | 5.86 | 0.99 | 0.26 | -0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.69 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.90 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -6.26 | -6.26 | -10.49 | -52.72 | — | -4360.30 | 103.63 | -9.56 | -11.43 | -17.43 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 2.39 | 4.84 | 3.69 | 7.10 | 6.22 | 0.80 | 4.26 | 9.23 | 6.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 1.07 | 2.58 | 2.32 | 4.49 | 4.50 | 0.43 | 2.68 | 6.04 | 2.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 2.93 | 2.36 | 0.14 | 1.18 | 4.13 | 0.90 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 1.49 | 0.77 | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.68 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.87 | 0.87 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 2.64 | 1.05 | 0.92 | 0.55 | 0.64 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 44.63 | 88.72 | 128.74 | 128.54 | 103.60 | 57.11 | 85.95 | 140.23 | 134.19 | 87.54 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.0% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $18M | $19M | $16M | $15M | $15M | $15M |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
According to recent market data, TOMZ trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 3.04, which appears disconnected from its negative earnings profile and suggests investors are pricing the firm as a speculative technology option rather than a traditional industrial entity with predictable cash flow generation capabilities.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio and the high price-to-book multiple of 26.93 indicate that the market is valuing the company based on its intellectual property and potential for future acquisition rather than current fundamental performance. This valuation disconnect warrants caution, as the lack of positive earnings makes traditional multiple-based comparisons to peers like Steris largely irrelevant.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -27.2% in 2025Q4, which highlights a severe inability to generate returns on invested capital as the business model struggles to achieve the necessary scale to cover its fixed cost base.
The consistent decay in ROIC over the last ten quarters suggests that capital allocation has not yielded the expected operational leverage. Investors should monitor whether the company can pivot toward a more efficient capital deployment strategy, as current trends indicate that every dollar invested is currently destroying rather than creating shareholder value.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has remained highly volatile, peaking at 654 days in 2025Q2, which indicates significant inefficiencies in managing inventory and collecting receivables compared to the more streamlined operations typically observed in the broader industrial pollution control sector.
The extended DIO and DSO figures suggest that the company is struggling to convert its hardware and consumable sales into cash in a timely manner. This inefficiency places additional pressure on the firm's already fragile liquidity position, as capital remains trapped in slow-moving inventory and outstanding customer payments.
Based on the most recent quarterly data, the quick ratio has deteriorated to 0.40, signaling that the company lacks sufficient liquid assets to cover its immediate obligations without relying on the liquidation of inventory, which may be difficult given the specialized nature of its hardware.
The rapid decline in the current ratio from historical highs suggests that the company's ability to withstand short-term financial stress is severely compromised. This liquidity profile appears unsustainable, and the firm may be forced to seek external financing or restructure its obligations to avoid a potential default scenario.
The price-to-sales ratio is frequently misapplied to TOMZ, as it obscures the company's underlying inability to convert revenue into positive cash flow, thereby providing a misleading sense of value for a business that is currently burning through its remaining cash reserves at an unsustainable rate.
Investors should prioritize cash-burn metrics and the cash-to-burn ratio over revenue-based multiples, as the latter fails to account for the high fixed-cost structure inherent in the company's operations. Relying on P/S ratios in this context ignores the fundamental risk that the company may run out of capital before it can reach a profitable scale.
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TOMZ stock.
TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.2x. The historical average is 51.3x.
TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -160.0%. The historical average is -67.9%.
Based on historical data, TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has 54.6% gross margin and -68.4% operating margin.