Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -739.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.5B | $19M | $955M | $2.1B | $2.9B | $3.7B | $2.1B | $1.9B | $1.6B | $834M | $812M |
| Enterprise Value | $20.6B | $6.1B | $6.1B | $4.5B | $3.4B | $4.2B | $2.5B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $846M | $806M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 19.14 | 0.02 | 1.18 | 2.71 | 5.01 | 7.04 | 4.42 | 1.80 | 1.71 | 0.57 | 0.50 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 1.08 | 1.27 | 1.17 | 1.75 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.38 | 0.34 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32.45 | — | 6.47 | 9.75 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.61 | 9.13 | 3.86 | 4.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.05 | 7.53 | 5.91 | 6.02 | 7.95 | 5.21 | 1.77 | 1.90 | 0.57 | 0.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13.87 | 15.48 | 6.94 | 4.77 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 123.36 | 924.98 | — | 82.41 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31.92 | — | 6.56 | 9.68 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -16.1% | -16.1% | 9.6% | 32.0% | 36.4% | 28.6% | 30.6% | 34.8% | 32.5% | 29.8% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | -175.4% | -175.4% | -55.2% | -41.1% | -35.5% | -40.4% | -40.7% | 1.4% | 0.2% | -1.9% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -212.4% | -212.4% | -107.1% | -43.5% | -35.1% | -99.7% | -40.7% | -28.6% | -30.3% | -6.7% | -1.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -739.9% | -739.9% | -69.0% | -16.2% | -8.8% | -24.9% | -9.3% | -15.0% | -13.0% | -4.3% | -0.9% |
| ROA | -21.7% | -21.7% | -11.9% | -6.3% | -5.5% | -15.7% | -6.3% | -11.3% | -10.6% | -3.6% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | -17.1% | -17.1% | -6.6% | -6.6% | -5.4% | -6.3% | -6.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | -0.9% | 0.3% |
| ROCE | -37.5% | -37.5% | -6.7% | -6.6% | -6.2% | -7.1% | -7.0% | 0.6% | 0.1% | -1.2% | 0.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 7.00 | 2.58 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.40 | 2.57 | 1.19 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 5.81 | 1.50 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.18 | -0.02 | 0.08 | 0.01 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.23 | 1.53 | 0.10 | -0.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.52 | — | 0.10 | -0.07 |
| Interest Coverage | -4.14 | -4.14 | -1.32 | -5.10 | -8.64 | -6.49 | -5.50 | 1.29 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 4.51 | 5.74 | 4.54 | 3.29 | 5.47 | 5.27 | 3.58 | 5.19 | 5.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.29 | 0.29 | 3.82 | 5.28 | 3.94 | 2.92 | 5.05 | 4.57 | 2.97 | 3.85 | 3.83 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 3.27 | 4.71 | 3.09 | 2.57 | 4.26 | 3.92 | 1.56 | 2.88 | 2.71 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.56 | 0.58 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.95 | 1.95 | 1.58 | 1.79 | 1.58 | 2.25 | 2.68 | 3.76 | 4.12 | 3.64 | 3.75 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 426.43 | 130.54 | 127.67 | 188.21 | 71.04 | 61.26 | 43.63 | 35.00 | 38.76 | 38.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.1% | — | 15.5% | 10.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12.5% | 18.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12.5% | 18.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $47M | $42M | $42M | $40M | $38M | $36M | $35M | $33M | $33M | $34M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WOLF stock.
Wolfspeed Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.8x. The historical average is 30.3x.
Wolfspeed Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -739.9%. The historical average is -1.8%.
Based on historical data, Wolfspeed Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Wolfspeed Inc. has -16.1% gross margin and -175.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
200mm yield ramp uncertainty
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Negative Margins Reflect Fab Ramp Pain
Gross margin swung from 11.1% in 2024Q3 to -46.5% in 2026Q2, with the latest quarter at 2.7%, indicating severe underutilization and start-up costs at Mohawk Valley, per financial statements.
The gross margin trajectory reveals a company in transition, where fixed costs of new 200mm capacity are not yet absorbed by revenue. Operating margin has been consistently negative, reaching -94.0% in 2026Q2, suggesting that depreciation and start-up expenses are overwhelming current sales. The recent improvement to 2.7% gross margin in 2026Q4 may indicate early yield stabilization, but the sustainability of this recovery is uncertain given the prior volatility. Investors should monitor whether gross margin can hold above breakeven as utilization ramps, as this is the primary lever for profitability.
ROIC Volatility Masks Capacity Build
ROIC swung from -1.1% in 2024Q3 to 27.5% in 2026Q4, a dramatic shift driven by asset write-downs and a capital raise, per reported figures, rather than operational improvement.
The apparent ROIC spike to 27.5% in 2026Q4 is misleading, as it results from a 62.5% contraction in total assets due to divestitures and impairments, not from increased operating income. The underlying business continues to generate negative returns on invested capital, with ROIC at -44.4% in 2026Q2 before the asset base shrank. This suggests that the company is not compounding returns but rather restructuring its capital base to reset the denominator. The true test of capital efficiency will come when the new fabs reach scale and generate positive NOPAT, which has yet to occur.
Working Capital Swings Obscure Cash Burn
Cash conversion cycle swung from 310 days in 2024Q3 to 242 days in 2026Q3, with DSO improving from 121 to 119 days, but negative DIO in 2026Q4 suggests inventory distortions, per quarterly data.
The efficiency metrics are highly erratic, with DSO spiking to 396 days in 2026Q1 before normalizing, and DIO turning negative in 2026Q4, which may indicate inventory write-downs or a shift in product mix. The cash conversion cycle remains elevated, reflecting the company's inability to convert sales into cash due to negative margins and slow-moving inventory. Asset turnover is extremely low at 0.05, highlighting the massive capital base relative to revenue. This suggests that working capital management is not a source of strength but rather a symptom of the broader operational challenges.
Leverage Spikes Then Retreats
Debt-to-equity surged to 21.15 in 2025Q3 before falling to 1.82 by 2026Q4, reflecting a major refinancing and equity raise, per balance sheet data, but interest coverage remains negative.
The leverage profile has been extremely volatile, with D/E peaking at 21.15 in 2025Q3 as losses eroded equity, before a capital raise restored equity to $930.2M. Interest coverage has been negative for most quarters, with the latest at 16.98 in 2026Q4, but this is driven by a one-time gain or accounting adjustment rather than operating income. The company's reliance on external financing to fund its capital-intensive ramp suggests that debt service remains a significant risk if cash flows do not improve. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance upcoming maturities without further dilution.
Cash Buffer Strengthens, But Burn Persists
Current ratio improved to 6.86 in 2026Q4 from 0.36 in 2025Q4, with cash rising to $1.1B, but free cash flow remains deeply negative at -81% margin, per quarterly filings.
The liquidity position has strengthened dramatically following the capital raise, with a current ratio of 6.86 and quick ratio of 5.85, providing a substantial buffer against near-term obligations. However, this liquidity is being consumed by ongoing operational losses, with FCF margin at -81% in 2026Q3. The company's ability to sustain this buffer depends on reducing cash burn, which requires the 200mm ramp to achieve higher utilization and positive gross margins. If the burn continues at current levels, the cash balance could be depleted within a few quarters, necessitating further financing.
Misapplied ROIC in Capital-Intensive Ramp
ROIC is commonly misapplied to Wolfspeed because negative margins and asset write-downs distort the metric, making it appear either artificially high or low, per reported figures.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Wolfspeed is ROIC, as the company's massive capital expenditures and recent impairments create a distorted picture. A negative ROIC in 2026Q2 (-44.4%) might suggest value destruction, while the 27.5% in 2026Q4 suggests value creation, but neither reflects the underlying economics of a fab ramp. Analysts should instead focus on gross margin per wafer and utilization rates, which are the true drivers of value in this capital-intensive business. The standard ROIC calculation fails to capture the multi-year lag between investment and returns, making it unreliable for assessing Wolfspeed's progress.