Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -0.0%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21M | $9M | $19M | $69M | $102M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $25M | $8M | $23M | $72M | $103M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 4.76 | 1.39 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.0% | -0.0% | -134.0% | -0.1% | -3.2% | -0.1% |
| ROA | 0.0% | 0.0% | -14.7% | -0.1% | -3.1% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | -0.0% | -0.0% | -176.8% | -3.6% | -3.4% | — |
| ROCE | -0.0% | -0.0% | -78.2% | -4.8% | -4.4% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.02 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.02 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | -24.50 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | -1.97 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($4022) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 10.92 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 10.92 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 8.55 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 57.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 57.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $772839 | $2M | $6M | $10M | $10M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WTMA stock.
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 0.0x.
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -0.0%. The historical average is -27.5%.
Based on historical data, Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Imminent Liquidation Risk
Capital Efficiency Decay Amid Stagnation
As reported in financial statements, WTMA's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -3.1% in 2024Q3, which underscores the company's inability to generate productive returns on its capital base while it remains trapped in a prolonged, non-operational search phase for a suitable technology metals target.
The consistent decline in ROIC reflects the erosion of shareholder capital as fixed administrative costs continue to mount without any offsetting revenue generation. This trend suggests that the company is failing to preserve the value of its initial trust, effectively destroying capital through the mere passage of time.
Critical Liquidity Depletion Threatens Viability
Based on recent SEC filings, WTMA's current ratio has collapsed to a nominal 0.02 as of 2025Q4, indicating that the company possesses virtually no liquid assets to cover its immediate regulatory and professional service obligations, leaving it entirely dependent on external sponsor support to remain a going concern.
The near-zero current ratio highlights an extreme liquidity crisis that renders the company unable to meet short-term liabilities without further capital injections. Investors should monitor the reliance on sponsor loans, as this indicates that the entity's internal cash reserves are insufficient to sustain its current operational trajectory.
Debt-Driven Survival Masks Structural Fragility
According to historical data, WTMA's debt-to-equity ratio spiked to 5.48 in 2025Q1, signaling that the company has increasingly relied on debt financing to fund its operations as its equity base has been severely eroded by persistent losses and the absence of a completed business combination.
The rising leverage ratio, in the context of zero revenue, suggests that the company is accumulating liabilities that may complicate any future merger or liquidation process. This reliance on debt appears to be a stop-gap measure rather than a sustainable financing strategy, warranting significant caution regarding the company's long-term solvency.
Misapplication of Traditional Valuation Metrics
As noted in market analysis, the use of P/E or EV/EBITDA ratios is fundamentally misapplied to WTMA, as these metrics assume ongoing operational earnings that do not exist for a shell company, thereby obscuring the true risk profile associated with its current cash-burning, pre-merger status.
Investors should instead focus on the Net Asset Value (NAV) per share and the remaining cash in the trust account, as these are the only metrics that provide a realistic floor for the company's valuation. Relying on traditional earnings multiples in this context may lead to a dangerous underestimation of the risk of total capital loss upon potential liquidation.