Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.0x · EV/EBITDA 5.2x · ROE 332.0%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $113M | $292M | $102M | $62.5B | $271M | $106.3B | $159.1B | $247.5B | $251.7B | $281.4B | $755M |
| Enterprise Value | $421M | $600M | $1.5B | $63.9B | $1.6B | $107.6B | $160.6B | $249.1B | $253.2B | $283.1B | $2.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.96 | 0.28 | — | — | — | 1581.31 | 2123.79 | 2068.96 | 1125.48 | 1718.30 | 11.12 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.13 | 70.24 | 0.26 | 87.75 | 115.46 | 175.12 | 166.26 | 215.36 | 0.65 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.36 | 0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 8.91 | — | — | — | 7.07 | 888.36 | 1860.82 | 1841.53 | 1011.87 | 1549.61 | 8.91 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 9345.63 | 3.54 | 675.70 | 1170.49 | 1357.04 | 851.62 | 1266.23 | 6.34 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.84 | 1.95 | 71.79 | 1.54 | 88.87 | 116.51 | 176.22 | 167.25 | 216.63 | 2.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.16 | 5.26 | 13.14 | 853.76 | — | 439.07 | 601.74 | 747.91 | 584.79 | 889.77 | 10.37 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.08 | 0.52 | — | 2868.92 | — | 652.80 | 744.01 | 870.14 | 655.38 | 1097.89 | 13.18 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 41.71 | 899.75 | 1877.78 | 1853.10 | 1017.94 | 1558.74 | 31.02 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.8% | 71.8% | 67.8% | 59.5% | 59.8% | 60.0% | 56.4% | 55.7% | 57.2% | 53.0% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 6.5% | 10.0% | 2.5% | -27.3% | 16.2% | 15.7% | 20.4% | 25.7% | 20.5% | 17.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 148.6% | 148.6% | -44.0% | -12.6% | -24.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | 8.5% | 14.8% | 12.5% | 5.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 332.0% | 332.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 141.1% | 141.1% | -45.1% | -11.2% | -20.9% | 4.6% | 5.0% | 8.2% | 16.8% | 13.0% | 5.0% |
| ROIC | 7.4% | 7.4% | 12.6% | 2.7% | -27.5% | 16.3% | 18.3% | 27.4% | 43.2% | 30.5% | 21.9% |
| ROCE | 7.8% | 7.8% | 13.7% | 2.8% | -28.0% | 16.8% | 19.3% | 26.5% | 39.4% | 28.4% | 21.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.47 | 1.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.11 | 4.11 | 12.72 | 19.91 | — | 6.19 | 6.06 | 5.22 | 4.03 | 5.47 | 7.82 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.70 | 2.70 | 12.27 | 18.45 | — | 5.56 | 5.43 | 4.67 | 3.49 | 5.21 | 7.39 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 34.64 | 11.39 | 16.96 | 11.57 | 6.07 | 9.13 | 22.11 |
| Interest Coverage | 18.21 | 18.21 | -2.17 | 0.23 | -3.52 | 1.88 | 1.75 | 2.12 | 2.71 | 2.29 | 1.73 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.69 | 1.69 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 1.43 | 1.18 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 1.07 | 0.61 | 0.80 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.69 | 1.69 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 1.33 | 1.05 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.69 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.24 | 0.37 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.75 | 1.43 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 0.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 5297.76 | 20.38 | 15.85 | 15.21 | 23.04 | 25.06 | 19.36 | 17.76 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 8.41 | 6.70 | 6.13 | 8.52 | 8.84 | 9.15 | 7.88 | 6.57 | 6.68 | 8.62 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 361.7% | — | — | — | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 9.0% |
| FCF Yield | 11.2% | — | — | — | 14.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 11.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $10M | $854455 | $77M | $755060 | $71M | $70M | $70M | $70M | $68M | $707558 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WW stock.
WW International, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.0x. The historical average is 5.7x.
WW International, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.6x.
WW International, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 332.0%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 209.9%.
Based on historical data, WW International, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
WW International, Inc. has 71.8% gross margin and 6.5% operating margin.
WW International, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin liquidity against operating burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Discount Reflects Structural Distress
Based on reported figures, WW trades at 0.11 trailing P/E, 3.69 EV/EBITDA, and 0.16 P/S, multiples far below the 41.80 EV/EBITDA of HIMS and 9.73 for PTON, suggesting the market prices in continued revenue erosion.
Multiples this compressed suggest the market is pricing in continued revenue erosion and recurring losses rather than a temporary earnings trough. The trailing P/E of 0.11 is largely a function of volatile reported net income, so it is less informative than EV/EBITDA or P/S, which still point to a heavily discounted enterprise. Investors should monitor whether the low multiple reflects a value opportunity or a market assessment that the equity cushion is fragile.
Gross Margin Strong, Operating Margin Fragile
Gross margin held between 58.1% and 73.7% across ten reported quarters, yet operating margin swung from negative 130.4% in Q1 2024 to 5.9% in Q2 2026, indicating earnings power is driven by cost structure rather than pricing.
The gap between stable gross margins and volatile operating margins points to a heavy fixed or semi-fixed SG&A base relative to shrinking revenue. Net margin of 8.7% in Q2 2026 appears flattered relative to the operating result and should be read cautiously against the repeated negative net margins earlier in the period. Operating margin, not net margin, is the better gauge of recurring earning power here.
Returns Oscillate Without Sustained Compounding
ROIC moved from negative 43.5% in Q1 2024 to 1.2% in Q2 2026, with ROE at 5.2% in the latest quarter after several negative readings, suggesting returns are not yet compounding on a durable basis.
Returns on invested capital have failed to hold a positive trajectory, with multiple quarters of negative ROIC interspersed among modest positive readings. The recent positive ROE is supported by a rebuilt equity base rather than a sustained earnings stream, which weakens its signal value. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can stay above zero across consecutive quarters before inferring a turn in capital efficiency.
Leverage Easing From Elevated Levels
Debt-to-equity fell to 1.53 in Q2 2026 from 1.76 in Q1 2026, while interest coverage of 0.38 in the latest quarter suggests operating earnings currently cover interest only partially.
Interest coverage below 1.0 in the latest quarter, after a 106.76 reading in Q2 2025 that appears distorted by a non-recurring pattern, indicates debt service may depend on cash on hand rather than operating income. The deleveraging visible in the balance sheet is meaningful but has not yet translated into comfortable coverage. Refinancing and covenant exposure warrant further investigation given the thin margin of safety.
Misapplied Trailing P/E Obscures Distress
The trailing P/E of 0.11 is the ratio most often misapplied to WW, because volatile reported net income, including a $347.9M loss in Q1 2024, makes the multiple unreliable as a valuation signal.
A near-zero trailing P/E is frequently read as cheapness, but here it largely reflects a single large loss and one-off swings rather than durable earnings. Replacing it with EV/EBITDA or EV/Sales, adjusted for non-recurring items and paired with the cash flow record, provides a more defensible view of what the market is pricing. Investors should treat the multiple as a symptom of earnings volatility rather than evidence of undervaluation.