Personal Products & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WW vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
WW vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $118M | $6.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $711M | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.06B | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 71.8% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 51.5x |
| Total Debt | $469M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $160M | $229M |
WW vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WW International, I… (WW) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WW vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 1.69x
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 1.69x
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 174.3% 10Y total return vs WW's -99.0%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs WW's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs WW's -9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 148.6% margin vs HIMS's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -45.7% vs WW's -84.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 115.9% ROA vs HIMS's 6.0%, ROIC 7.4% vs 10.7% |
WW vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WW vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 3.3x WW's $711M. WW is the more profitable business, keeping 148.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIMS's 5.5%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $711M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $88M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.8% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +148.6% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.7% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, WW trades at a 100% valuation discount to HIMS's 52.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WW's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 44.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $118M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $426M | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.11x | 52.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.74x | 44.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 2.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 12.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 93.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WW leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WW delivers a 3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $24 for HIMS. WW carries lower financial leverage with a 1.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WW scores 6/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +115.9% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.47x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $308M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $160M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $469M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $25,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $36 for WW. Over the past 12 months, HIMS leads with a -45.7% total return vs WW's -84.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 31.4% vs WW's -75.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -62.5% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.0% | -45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +126.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +150.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +174.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.4% | +31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WW and HIMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WW is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIMS currently trades 38.2% from its 52-week high vs WW's 14.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.14 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.91 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.7% | +38.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 343K | 35.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WW as "Hold" and HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 192.4% upside for WW (target: $35) vs 10.4% for HIMS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.50 | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% |
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
WW vs HIMS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WW or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for WW International, Inc. (WW). WW International, Inc. (WW) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WW International, Inc. (WW) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WW or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, WW International, Inc.
(WW) is the cheapest at 0. 1x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 52. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WW or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +150. 5%, compared to -99. 6% for WW International, Inc. (WW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus WW's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WW or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WW International, Inc.
(WW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 141% more volatile than WW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WW International, Inc. (WW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 147% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WW or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -9. 6% for WW International, Inc. (WW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WW International, Inc. grew EPS 25. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WW or HIMS?
WW International, Inc.
(WW) is the more profitable company, earning 148. 6% net margin versus 5. 5% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 148. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WW leads at 6. 5% versus 5. 2% for HIMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WW leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WW or HIMS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WW: 192.
4% to $34. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WW or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WW or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WW International, Inc.
(WW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WW: -99. 2%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WW and HIMS?
These companies operate in different sectors (WW (Consumer Cyclical) and HIMS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WW is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.