Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA 7.9x · ROE 71.7%. (2022–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $9M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.56 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.93 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 9.12 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 77.0% | 77.0% | 79.6% | 30.9% |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 48.2% | 54.2% | -38.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 39.4% | 39.4% | 48.6% | -38.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 71.7% | 71.7% | 182.2% | — |
| ROA | 35.7% | 35.7% | 84.2% | -33.2% |
| ROIC | 99.7% | 99.7% | 249.7% | — |
| ROCE | 87.6% | 87.6% | 200.2% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.19 | -0.76 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.28 | -0.28 | -0.79 | -1.27 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -0.78 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($327111) exceeds total debt ($6890)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 2.55 | 0.56 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 2.55 | 0.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 2.44 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 1.08 | 0.87 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 295.52 | 0.01 | 221.84 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $12M | $12M |
Liquidity and revenue lumpiness
Based on reported figures, ZGM trades at a P/S multiple of 4.37, which suggests that the market is pricing the company as a high-growth fintech-enabled service provider rather than a traditional industrial consultant, despite the inherent risks associated with its short operating history and project-based revenue model.
The 7.59x EV/EBITDA multiple indicates that investors are willing to pay a premium for the company's 135.19% revenue growth rate. This valuation appears to hinge on the assumption that ZGM can maintain its high margins while scaling its proprietary blockchain models across new industrial park contracts.
According to recent financial statements, ZGM maintains a robust 77.03% gross margin and a 48.25% operating margin, which suggests that the company's business model is highly efficient and benefits from a cost structure primarily focused on specialized human capital rather than capital-intensive physical assets.
The 39.37% net margin is particularly impressive for a newly incorporated entity, implying that the company has successfully captured high-value, low-overhead mandates. However, investors should monitor whether these margins are sustainable as the company scales or if they are merely a byproduct of early-stage, non-recurring project wins.
As reported in recent filings, ZGM holds $327,111 in cash and equivalents, representing only 16% of TTM revenue, which indicates a potentially vulnerable liquidity position that may struggle to support the working capital demands of its rapid 135.19% year-over-year growth and project-based revenue recognition cycle.
The limited cash reserves relative to the scale of operations suggest that any delay in client payments could create significant cash flow friction. This liquidity profile warrants caution, as the company lacks the financial cushion typically required to navigate the inherent volatility of the Macau industrial development sector.
Based on the company's reported figures, ZGM operates with a 0.00% debt-to-equity ratio, which suggests a conservative capital allocation strategy that avoids interest burdens but may also indicate limited access to traditional credit markets for a newly incorporated entity seeking to fund further expansion or infrastructure.
While the absence of debt is a positive indicator of initial operational success, it may also limit the company's ability to pursue large-scale acquisitions or capital-heavy projects. Investors should consider whether this lack of leverage is a strategic choice or a constraint imposed by the company's short operating history.
The most commonly misapplied metric for ZGM is the net margin, which obscures the significant gap between reported accounting profits and actual cash generation, as the company's project-based revenue recognition model often leads to a mismatch between earnings and the timing of realized cash inflows.
Investors should prioritize cash flow from operations and contract backlog metrics over net margins to better assess the company's true underlying health. Relying solely on accounting profitability may lead to an overestimation of the company's ability to self-fund its rapid expansion without future equity dilution.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ZGM stock.
Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares's current EV/EBITDA is 7.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares's return on equity (ROE) is 71.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 126.9%.
Based on historical data, Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares has 77.0% gross margin and 48.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Zenta Group Company Limited Ordinary Shares's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.