Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -205.5%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $362986 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -2.9% | -2.9% | 29.6% | — | 48.3% | -45.3% | — | — | 14.7% | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| Operating Margin | -214.7% | -214.7% | -954.2% | — | -477.6% | -140.9% | — | — | -7.3% | -19.5% | -18.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -492.8% | -492.8% | -949.1% | — | -467.4% | -142.1% | — | — | -16.2% | -24.5% | -29.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -205.5% | -205.5% | -124.3% | -103.5% | -123.1% | -23.1% | -489.8% | -281.5% | -75.6% | -71.2% | -52.0% |
| ROA | -135.6% | -135.6% | -93.2% | -90.7% | -114.8% | -21.9% | -56.8% | -26.8% | -11.1% | -12.6% | -14.1% |
| ROIC | -61.0% | -61.0% | -91.9% | -78.8% | -95.2% | -17.4% | -126.7% | -28.4% | -7.0% | -15.0% | -10.7% |
| ROCE | -89.5% | -89.5% | -124.9% | -103.4% | -125.8% | -22.9% | -145.2% | -130.3% | -34.2% | -56.6% | -31.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.06 | — | — | — | — | 0.59 | 2.69 | 3.21 | 1.64 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.06 | -0.01 | -0.02 | -0.00 | -0.15 | -0.02 | 2.57 | 2.76 | 1.40 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10.80 | 18.31 | 5.22 |
| Interest Coverage | -1.95 | -1.95 | -297.10 | -6032.74 | -10976.98 | — | -1024.32 | -4507.81 | -2.45 | -6.11 | -5.67 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 1.16 | 3.01 | 5.55 | 1.85 | 5.98 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.09 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 1.16 | 3.01 | 5.55 | 1.85 | 5.98 | 0.98 | 1.15 | 1.08 | 0.71 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 1.87 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.24 | 0.10 | — | 0.31 | 0.08 | — | — | 0.86 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 91.35 | 70.13 | 1.36 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 111.56 | 206.97 | — | 206.09 | 172.20 | — | — | 357.47 | 387.16 | 322.18 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3850 | $209 | $64 | $19 | $7 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
According to current market data, ZNB trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.04, which, when combined with the absence of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples, suggests that investors are pricing the company as a distressed venture rather than a viable, long-term entertainment platform participant.
The extremely low P/S multiple reflects deep market skepticism regarding the company's ability to monetize its user base or achieve operational scale. This valuation suggests that the market assigns little to no terminal value to the current business model, viewing the revenue growth as insufficient to offset the persistent and substantial operating losses.
As reported in financial statements, ZNB's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -3.0% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the company is failing to generate any economic return on the capital deployed into its celebrity-led digital entertainment and consulting initiatives.
The inability to achieve a positive return on capital suggests that the company's core strategy of leveraging celebrity partnerships is fundamentally inefficient. Investors should monitor whether management can pivot toward a model that requires less capital intensity, as the current trend points toward continued erosion of shareholder value.
Based on historical filings, ZNB's asset turnover ratio of 0.15 in 2026Q2 highlights a significant underutilization of the company's asset base, suggesting that the current infrastructure is not being effectively converted into revenue-generating activities compared to broader industry standards.
The volatility in DSO and the lack of consistent CCC metrics indicate that the company struggles to manage its operational cycle effectively. This inefficiency appears to be a structural issue, as the company's disparate business lines likely prevent the development of a streamlined and predictable working capital process.
According to recent SEC filings, ZNB's current ratio of 21.17 in 2026Q2 is misleadingly high due to the composition of its current assets, which likely masks a severe lack of liquid cash reserves needed to cover ongoing operational burn and short-term liabilities.
While the headline current ratio appears robust, the company's actual cash position of only $1.06M suggests that it is highly vulnerable to any disruption in revenue or unexpected capital requirements. This liquidity profile warrants extreme caution, as the company lacks the financial cushion to withstand even minor operational shocks.
The market frequently misapplies the revenue growth metric to ZNB, failing to recognize that in a business with negative gross margins, top-line expansion actually accelerates the rate of cash burn rather than signaling a path toward future profitability or sustainable scale.
Investors should prioritize unit economics and gross margin expansion over headline revenue growth, as the latter is currently a vanity metric that obscures the underlying operational fragility. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the contribution margin per user, which would better reveal the true viability of the celebrity-led platform.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ZNB stock.
Zeta Network Group's current P/E ratio is -0.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Zeta Network Group's return on equity (ROE) is -205.5%. The historical average is -83.2%.
Based on historical data, Zeta Network Group is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Zeta Network Group has -2.9% gross margin and -214.7% operating margin.