AAPL vs AMZN

For growth investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Apple Inc. (AAPL) offers the better valuation at 38. 1x trailing P/E (33. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apple Inc. (AAPL) a "Buy" — based on 110 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the cheapest at 38. 1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Apple Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 25x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 87x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) delivered a total return of +125. 6%, compared to +67. 3% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1155% versus AMZN's +730. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 53% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to 22. 7% for Apple Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 25x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 87x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Apple Inc. (AAPL) trades at 33. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 12. 2% to $306. 77.

In this comparison, AAPL (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1155% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1155%, AMZN: +730. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AAPL (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.