ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$38.15B
5Y Perf.+101.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ADM vs BG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$25.30B
5Y Perf.+234.1%
ADM vs BG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ADM | BG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $38.15B | $25.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80.61B | $80.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $686M |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 5.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.0x | 15.1x |
| Total Debt | $8.41B | $16.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $1.14B |
ADM vs BG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ADM
BG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 201.4 | +101.4% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 334.1 | +234.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADM vs BG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ADM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Bunge Global S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
The Income Pick
ADM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
The Growth Play
BG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 151.5% 10Y total return vs ADM's 149.4%
- 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BG | 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% |
| Value | BG | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 19.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | ADM | 1.3% margin vs BG's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | ADM | Beta 0.12 vs BG's 0.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ADM | 2.6% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs BG's 2.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BG | +71.1% vs ADM's +71.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ADM | 2.8% ROA vs BG's 1.6%, ROIC 3.3% vs 3.3% |
ADM vs BG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
ADM vs BG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLADMLAGGINGBG
BGBunge Global S.A.
2leads
ADMArcher-Daniels-Midlan…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ADM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BG4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ADM7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BG6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ADM2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM and BG operate at a comparable scale, with $80.6B and $80.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.3% (ADM) to 0.9% (BG). On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80.6B | $80.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.0B | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $686M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | $112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +5.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +87.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -76.4% |
ADM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.5x trailing earnings, BG trades at a 25% valuation discount to ADM's 35.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADM's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BG's 23.3x.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.1B | $25.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45.5B | $41.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.50x | 26.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.02x | 15.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.48x | 23.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.07x | — |
BG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADM delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for BG. ADM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BG's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADM scores 6/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.4B | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $17.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.03x | 3.10x |
ADM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $15,887 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,329 for ADM. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +71.1% total return vs ADM's +71.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 15.2% vs ADM's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.9% | +41.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.0% | +71.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.3% | +58.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.4% | +151.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.8% | +15.2% |
BG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADM and BG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BG's 0.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.75 | $133.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.81 | $71.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.9 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 1.7M |
Evenly matched — ADM and BG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ADM as "Hold" and BG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for BG (target: $134) vs -24.2% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, ADM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs BG's 2.11%.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $133.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 31 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% |
ADM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ADM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallArcher-Daniels-Midland Comp… (ADM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ADM vs BG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADM or BG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Bunge Global S. A. (BG) offers the better valuation at 26. 5x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bunge Global S. A. (BG) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADM or BG?
On trailing P/E, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the cheapest at 26. 5x versus Archer-Daniels-Midland Company at 35. 5x. On forward P/E, Bunge Global S. A. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADM or BG?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +58. 9%, compared to +33. 3% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BG returned +151. 5% versus ADM's +149. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADM or BG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Bunge Global S. A. 's 0. 25β — meaning BG is approximately 115% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 97% for Bunge Global S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADM or BG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bunge Global S. A. grew EPS -38. 4% year-over-year, compared to -38. 9% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADM or BG?
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
3% net margin versus 1. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. — meaning it keeps 1. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADM leads at 1. 8% versus 1. 5% for BG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADM leads at 6. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADM or BG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BG: 2. 5% to $133. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADM or BG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Bunge Global S. A. (BG).
09Is ADM or BG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +149. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +149. 4%, BG: +151. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADM and BG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(ADM: 1.6% · BG: 87.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ADM: 35.5x · BG: 26.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.