Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ADXN vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ADXN vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5M | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $68K | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | -246.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -36.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $42K | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $357M |
ADXN vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Addex Therapeutics … (ADXN) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADXN vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADXN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.59
- Rev growth -74.9%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -48.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 4.42x
PRAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -20.1% 10Y total return vs ADXN's -96.9%
- 2.4% margin vs ADXN's -90.2%
- +7.7% vs ADXN's -13.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -74.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs ADXN's -90.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs ADXN's -13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -40.2% ROA vs ADXN's -67.7%, ROIC -65.0% vs -103.3% |
ADXN vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ADXN vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADXN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADXN and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $67,607 and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $67,607 | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -90.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADXN and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $394,716 | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.65x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.93x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -43.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-78 for ADXN. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADXN's 0.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADXN scores 4/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.3% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.7% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -103.3% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.4% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41,994 | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1857.72x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $7,918 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $354 for ADXN. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs ADXN's -13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ADXN's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.3% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.1% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.0% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.7% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADXN and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADXN is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ADXN's 58.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.05 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.41 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.2% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ADXN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ADXN vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADXN or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Addex Therapeutics Ltd (ADXN) is the stronger pick with -74.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Addex Therapeutics Ltd (ADXN) offers the better valuation at 0. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ADXN or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) delivered a total return of -20. 8%, compared to -96. 5% for Addex Therapeutics Ltd (ADXN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRAX returned -20. 1% versus ADXN's -96. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ADXN or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Addex Therapeutics Ltd (ADXN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
59β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 162% more volatile than ADXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 0% for Addex Therapeutics Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ADXN or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Addex Therapeutics Ltd (ADXN) is pulling ahead at -74.
9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Addex Therapeutics Ltd grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ADXN or PRAX?
Addex Therapeutics Ltd (ADXN) is the more profitable company, earning 1746% net margin versus 0.
0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1746% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAX leads at 0. 0% versus -681. 8% for ADXN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADXN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ADXN or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ADXN or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Addex Therapeutics Ltd (ADXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
59)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADXN: -96. 9%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ADXN and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADXN is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.