Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AGRO vs CRESY vs CAAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
AGRO vs CRESY vs CAAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Conglomerates | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $6.89B | $727M | $4.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.43B | $1.05T | $1.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $234.51B | $183M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 42.0% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 62.1% | 23.1% |
| Forward P/E | 6.9x | 9999.0x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $1.46T | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $383M | $250.85B | $440M |
AGRO vs CRESY vs CAAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) | 100 | 310.2 | +210.2% |
| Cresud Sociedad Anó… (CRESY) | 100 | 364.6 | +264.6% |
| Corporación América… (CAAP) | 100 | 1053.8 | +953.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGRO vs CRESY vs CAAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGRO is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.1x)
- +58.7% vs CRESY's +10.5%
CRESY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 8.5%
- 64.4% 10Y total return vs CAAP's 57.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 66.1%, current ratio 1.24x
CAAP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.7%, EPS growth 18.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.6%
- 31.7% revenue growth vs AGRO's -9.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.7% revenue growth vs AGRO's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs AGRO's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs CAAP's 1.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.5% yield, vs AGRO's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.7% vs CRESY's +10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs AGRO's -0.2%, ROIC 5.7% vs -2.1% |
AGRO vs CRESY vs CAAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AGRO vs CRESY vs CAAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRESY leads in 3 of 6 categories
CAAP leads 1 • AGRO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.05T annually — 737.2x AGRO's $1.4B. CRESY is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGRO's -0.5%. On growth, CRESY holds the edge at +50.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.05T | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $335M | $670.2B | $686M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $234.5B | $183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | $116.8B | $353M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +42.0% | +34.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +62.1% | +23.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +22.3% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +11.1% | +18.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +50.4% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -162.5% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CRESY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, CAAP trades at a 100% valuation discount to CRESY's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAAP's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGRO's 72.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $727M | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.5B | $1.6B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -815.24x | 9999.00x | 14.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.85x | — | 12.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 72.46x | 9.60x | 8.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.01x | 1.10x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.82x | 0.47x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 334.52x | 9.55x | 10.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAAP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAAP delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-1 for AGRO. CRESY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGRO's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAAP scores 7/9 vs AGRO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.5% | +10.1% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +4.3% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | +5.7% | +15.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | +6.4% | +12.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.66x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $1.21T | $729M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $383M | $250.9B | $440M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $1.46T | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 3.48x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRESY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAAP five years ago would be worth $42,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,007 for AGRO. Over the past 12 months, AGRO leads with a +58.7% total return vs CRESY's +10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRESY at 34.1% vs AGRO's 19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +73.8% | -9.4% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.7% | +10.5% | +28.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.9% | +140.9% | +127.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.1% | +132.8% | +322.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.9% | +64.4% | +57.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +34.1% | +31.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AGRO and CAAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGRO is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAAP's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAAP currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs CRESY's 79.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.08x | 1.19x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.89 | $14.21 | $30.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.89 | $8.32 | $17.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +79.0% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 50.8 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 272K | 259K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGRO and CRESY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGRO as "Hold", CRESY as "Buy", CAAP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for CAAP (target: $31) vs -36.4% for AGRO (target: $9). For income investors, CRESY offers the higher dividend yield at 8.47% vs AGRO's 0.51%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.50 | $12.68 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +8.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.07 | $1320.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
CRESY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CAAP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
AGRO vs CRESY vs CAAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGRO or CRESY or CAAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is the stronger pick with 31. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). Corporación América Airports S. A. (CAAP) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGRO or CRESY or CAAP?
On trailing P/E, Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Adecoagro S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGRO or CRESY or CAAP?
Over the past 5 years, Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) delivered a total return of +322. 6%, compared to +50. 1% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRESY returned +64. 4% versus AGRO's +39. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGRO or CRESY or CAAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Corporación América Airports S. A. 's 1. 24β — meaning CAAP is approximately -1642% more volatile than AGRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 109% for Adecoagro S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGRO or CRESY or CAAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is pulling ahead at 31. 7% versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Corporación América Airports S. A. grew EPS 18. 1% year-over-year, compared to -109. 1% for Adecoagro S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAAP leads at 37. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGRO or CRESY or CAAP?
Corporación América Airports S.
A. (CAAP) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 3% net margin versus -0. 6% for Adecoagro S. A. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRESY leads at 24. 2% versus -5. 7% for AGRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRESY leads at 39. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGRO or CRESY or CAAP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Corporación América Airports S. A. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAAP: 20. 1% to $31. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGRO or CRESY or CAAP?
In this comparison, CRESY (8.
5% yield), AGRO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CAAP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AGRO or CRESY or CAAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 0. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGRO: +39. 9%, CAAP: +57. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGRO and CRESY and CAAP?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGRO (Consumer Defensive) and CRESY (Industrials) and CAAP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRESY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAAP is a small-cap high-growth stock. AGRO, CRESY pay a dividend while CAAP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.