Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMSF vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Diversified
AMSF vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $556M | $33.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $325M | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $491K | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $993M |
AMSF vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 335.6 | +235.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMSF vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMSF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 8.6%
- 8.6% yield, vs ACGL's 0.0%
ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 325.3% 10Y total return vs AMSF's 33.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs AMSF's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs AMSF's 0.23 | |
| Dividends | 8.6% yield, vs ACGL's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.8% vs AMSF's -31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs AMSF's 5.6%, ROIC 15.4% vs 21.9% |
AMSF vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMSF vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 61.4x AMSF's $325M. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMSF's 14.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $325M | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.5% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ACGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 32% valuation discount to AMSF's 12.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACGL's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSF's 8.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $556M | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $495M | $35.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.98x | 8.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.09x | 10.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.30x | 6.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.25x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 62.35x | 5.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $10 for AMSF. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACGL's 0.11x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.9% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.8% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$61M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $491,000 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $25,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, ACGL leads with a +1.8% total return vs AMSF's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACGL at 9.4% vs AMSF's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.1% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.7% | +1.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.1% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +150.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | +325.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.6% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSF's 0.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 61.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.54 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.42 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.0% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.8 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 211K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
AMSF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMSF as "Buy" and ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.3% upside for AMSF (target: $45) vs 9.8% for ACGL (target: $104). AMSF is the only dividend payer here at 8.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.50 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.6% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.55 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +5.6% |
ACGL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMSF leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).
AMSF vs ACGL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMSF or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMSF or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus AMERISAFE, Inc. at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMSF or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +150. 7%, compared to -20. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +325. 3% versus AMSF's +33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMSF or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus AMERISAFE, Inc. 's 0. 23β — meaning AMSF is approximately 1410% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 11% for Arch Capital Group Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMSF or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arch Capital Group Ltd. grew EPS 3. 8% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACGL leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMSF or ACGL?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 14. 9% for AMERISAFE, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACGL leads at 25. 0% versus 18. 6% for AMSF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMSF or ACGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for AMERISAFE, Inc. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSF: 50. 3% to $44. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMSF or ACGL?
In this comparison, AMSF (8.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ACGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMSF or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +33. 4%, ACGL: +325. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMSF and ACGL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
AMSF pays a dividend while ACGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.