Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ACGL vs RNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Reinsurance
ACGL vs RNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Reinsurance |
| Market Cap | $33.74B | $13.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.93B | $11.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.40B | $3.09B |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 35.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.73B | $2.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $993M | $1.73B |
ACGL vs RNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 335.6 | +235.6% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 180.3 | +80.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACGL vs RNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 325.3% 10Y total return vs RNR's 182.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.03, yield 0.6%
- PEG 0.26 vs ACGL's 0.35
- Beta -0.03, yield 0.6%, current ratio 5.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs RNR's 9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs ACGL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (11.3% vs 12.1%) | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.9% vs ACGL's +1.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs RNR's 5.7%, ROIC 15.4% vs 16.0% |
ACGL vs RNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACGL vs RNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 1.7x RNR's $11.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 26.9% (RNR) to 22.1% (ACGL). On growth, ACGL holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.9B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.2B | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.4B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.1B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +44.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +35.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | -36.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.0% | +100.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 34% valuation discount to ACGL's 8.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RNR offers better value at 0.18x vs ACGL's 0.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.7B | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35.5B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.15x | 5.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.07x | 7.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.86x | 3.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.69x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.51x | 3.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $17 for RNR. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNR's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs ACGL's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +16.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.4% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $598M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $993M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 34.86x | 33.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $25,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,967 for RNR. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +22.9% total return vs ACGL's +1.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RNR at 13.6% vs ACGL's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.8% | +22.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.9% | +46.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.7% | +89.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +325.3% | +182.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACGL's 0.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ACGL's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | -0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $103.39 | $318.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $82.45 | $231.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.1 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 308K |
Analyst Outlook
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ACGL as "Buy" and RNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for ACGL (target: $104) vs 1.9% for RNR (target: $308). RNR is the only dividend payer here at 0.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $104.00 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +12.2% |
RNR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACGL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
ACGL vs RNR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACGL or RNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 4% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACGL or RNR?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. at 8. 1x. On forward P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACGL or RNR?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +150. 7%, compared to +89. 7% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +325. 3% versus RNR's +182. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACGL or RNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 02β — meaning ACGL is approximately -148% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 12% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACGL or RNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 9. 4% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 60. 8% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACGL or RNR?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 21. 0% for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 25. 0% for ACGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNR leads at 40. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACGL or RNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Arch Capital Group Ltd. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACGL: 9. 8% to $104. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACGL or RNR?
In this comparison, RNR (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ACGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACGL or RNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +182. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +182. 4%, ACGL: +325. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACGL and RNR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RNR pays a dividend while ACGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.