Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $253M | $19.25B | $23.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $74M | $2.23B | $2.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-66M | $-3.19B | $-1.13B |
| Gross Margin | 94.6% | -13.9% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | -101.1% | -153.3% | -45.9% |
| Total Debt | $25M | $1.92B | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $231M | $2.60B | $7.67B |
ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcturus Therapeuti… (ARCT) | 100 | 22.9 | -77.1% |
| Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| BioNTech SE (BNTX) | 100 | 187.8 | +87.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARCT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MRNA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +101.7% vs ARCT's -18.7%
BNTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.14
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth -62.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.8%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs MRNA's 161.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.2% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -39.6% margin vs MRNA's -143.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs ARCT's 2.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +101.7% vs ARCT's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.3% ROA vs MRNA's -26.6%, ROIC -4.3% vs -26.1% |
ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BNTX leads in 5 of 6 categories
ARCT leads 0 • MRNA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BNTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BNTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 38.6x ARCT's $74M. BNTX is the more profitable business, keeping -39.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRNA's -143.6%. On growth, MRNA holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $74M | $2.2B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$72M | -$3.2B | -$931M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$66M | -$3.2B | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | -$1.6B | $277M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.6% | -13.9% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -101.1% | -153.3% | -45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -88.7% | -143.6% | -39.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -100.8% | -71.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.3% | +2.6% | -24.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | -34.9% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BNTX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $253M | $19.3B | $23.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $47M | $18.6B | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.71x | -6.69x | -17.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.76x | 9.90x | 7.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 2.18x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 74.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BNTX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BNTX delivers a -6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MRNA. BNTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRNA's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BNTX scores 4/9 vs ARCT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.1% | -36.7% | -6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.0% | -26.6% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | -26.1% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.2% | -27.6% | -3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.22x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$206M | -$679M | -$7.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $231M | $2.6B | $7.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $1.9B | $267M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1803.00x | -62.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BNTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BNTX five years ago would be worth $5,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,799 for ARCT. Over the past 12 months, MRNA leads with a +101.7% total return vs ARCT's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BNTX at -4.9% vs ARCT's -32.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.4% | +57.3% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.7% | +101.7% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.8% | -63.2% | -13.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.0% | -70.2% | -48.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.9% | +161.0% | +568.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.2% | -28.3% | -4.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRNA and BNTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BNTX is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCT's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRNA currently trades 81.5% from its 52-week high vs ARCT's 36.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.41x | 1.82x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.17 | $59.55 | $124.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.85 | $22.28 | $79.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.8% | +81.5% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 47.0 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 454K | 6.9M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BNTX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARCT as "Buy", MRNA as "Hold", BNTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 152.8% upside for ARCT (target: $23) vs -25.8% for MRNA (target: $36).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | $36.00 | $137.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 27 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BNTX leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARCT or MRNA or BNTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BioNTech SE (BNTX) is the stronger pick with 0.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). Analysts rate Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARCT or MRNA or BNTX?
Over the past 5 years, BioNTech SE (BNTX) delivered a total return of -48.
2%, compared to -72. 0% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNTX returned +568. 1% versus ARCT's -69. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARCT or MRNA or BNTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioNTech SE (BNTX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
14β versus Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. 's 2. 41β — meaning ARCT is approximately 111% more volatile than BNTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNTech SE (BNTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 22% for Moderna, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ARCT or MRNA or BNTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BioNTech SE (BNTX) is pulling ahead at 0.
2% versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Moderna, Inc. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -62. 8% for BioNTech SE. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARCT leads at -31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARCT or MRNA or BNTX?
BioNTech SE (BNTX) is the more profitable company, earning -39.
6% net margin versus -145. 2% for Moderna, Inc. — meaning it keeps -39. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BNTX leads at -22. 6% versus -158. 1% for MRNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCT leads at 95. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ARCT or MRNA or BNTX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ARCT or MRNA or BNTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioNTech SE (BNTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
14), +568. 1% 10Y return). Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT) carries a higher beta of 2. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BNTX: +568. 1%, ARCT: -69. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ARCT and MRNA and BNTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.