REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARI vs BXMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
ARI vs BXMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.45B | $3.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $709M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $127M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | 62.6% |
| Operating Margin | 56.0% | 58.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $7.92B | $16.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $140M | $453M |
ARI vs BXMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo Commercial R… (ARI) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.8 | -18.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARI vs BXMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 9.3%
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth 183.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 62.9% 10Y total return vs BXMT's 52.6%
BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (12.1x vs 12.7x)
- 9.8% yield, vs ARI's 9.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3% FFO/revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 12.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs BXMT's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs BXMT's 0.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, vs ARI's 9.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.9% vs BXMT's +13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs BXMT's 0.5%, ROIC 4.0% vs 4.3% |
ARI vs BXMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.2x ARI's $709M. ARI is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BXMT's 6.7%. On growth, BXMT holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $709M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $410M | $948M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $127M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $335M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +62.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +58.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARI and BXMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, ARI trades at a 55% valuation discount to BXMT's 30.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXMT's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARI's 19.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.2B | $19.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.52x | 30.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.66x | 12.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.09x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.42x | 16.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.05x | 2.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.38x | 11.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARI delivers a 6.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $3 for BXMT. ARI carries lower financial leverage with a 4.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.27x | 4.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.8B | $15.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $140M | $453M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARI five years ago would be worth $11,260 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,733 for BXMT. Over the past 12 months, ARI leads with a +27.9% total return vs BXMT's +13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARI at 14.8% vs BXMT's 14.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | +13.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.3% | +49.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.6% | -2.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.9% | +52.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.8% | +14.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ARI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARI is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BXMT's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARI currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs BXMT's 93.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.24 | $20.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.30 | $17.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
BXMT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARI as "Hold" and BXMT as "Hold". For income investors, BXMT offers the higher dividend yield at 9.79% vs ARI's 9.29%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% |
ARI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BXMT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ARI vs BXMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARI or BXMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the stronger pick with 1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARI or BXMT?
On trailing P/E, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARI or BXMT?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) delivered a total return of +12. 6%, compared to -2. 7% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARI returned +62. 9% versus BXMT's +52. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARI or BXMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning BXMT is approximately 24% more volatile than ARI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARI or BXMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is pulling ahead at 1. 3% versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. grew EPS 183. 5% year-over-year, compared to 154. 7% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARI or BXMT?
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus 7. 2% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXMT leads at 71. 6% versus 65. 4% for ARI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARI leads at 80. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARI or BXMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 7x for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARI or BXMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) offers the highest yield at 9. 8%, versus 9. 3% for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI).
09Is ARI or BXMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 9. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARI: +62. 9%, BXMT: +52. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARI and BXMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.