ASAN vs TEAM

For growth investors, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the stronger pick with 19.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 2% for Asana, Inc. (ASAN). Analysts rate Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) delivered a total return of -59.

4%, compared to -76. 0% for Asana, Inc. (ASAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEAM returned +306. 8% versus ASAN's -76. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

98β versus Asana, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning ASAN is approximately 48% more volatile than TEAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 135% for Asana, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is pulling ahead at 19.

7% versus 9. 2% for Asana, Inc. (ASAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Asana, Inc. grew EPS 27. 9% year-over-year, compared to 15. 5% for Atlassian Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEAM leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the more profitable company, earning -4.

9% net margin versus -23. 9% for Asana, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEAM leads at -2. 5% versus -25. 0% for ASAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASAN leads at 89. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) trades at 18.

7x forward P/E versus 26. 6x for Asana, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASAN: 79. 9% to $12. 29.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

98), +306. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEAM: +306. 8%, ASAN: -76. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ASAN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TEAM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.