ASPN vs MTRN

For growth investors, Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the stronger pick with 6.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 1% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN). Materion Corporation (MTRN) offers the better valuation at 54. 9x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Materion Corporation (MTRN) delivered a total return of +159.

4%, compared to -77. 8% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTRN returned +669. 3% versus ASPN's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

62β versus Aspen Aerogels, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning ASPN is approximately 18% more volatile than MTRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 64% for Materion Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Materion Corporation (MTRN) is pulling ahead at 6.

0% versus -40. 1% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materion Corporation grew EPS 1179% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASPN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

2% net margin versus -143. 7% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTRN leads at 6. 5% versus -19. 0% for ASPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASPN leads at 17. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASPN: 645.

4% to $30. 71.

In this comparison, MTRN (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. ASPN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+669.

3% 10Y return). Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTRN: +669. 3%, ASPN: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ASPN (Industrials) and MTRN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.