Waste Management
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AWX vs CWST vs USPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Medical - Care Facilities
AWX vs CWST vs USPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $10M | $5.35B | $897M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $1.88B | $695M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $585K | $7M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 17.4% | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 4.5% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 30.7x | 63.9x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $1.24B | $426M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $124M | $36M |
AWX vs CWST vs USPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon Holdings Cor… (AWX) | 100 | 184.7 | +84.7% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
| U.S. Physical Thera… (USPH) | 100 | 79.6 | -20.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AWX vs CWST vs USPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AWX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -7.0% vs CWST's -28.9%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs AWX's 29.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
USPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 3.1%
- Lower P/E (20.6x vs 63.9x)
- 1.5% margin vs CWST's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs AWX's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs CWST's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs USPH's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.0% vs CWST's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs CWST's 0.2%, ROIC 5.6% vs 2.6% |
AWX vs CWST vs USPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AWX vs CWST vs USPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 22.0x AWX's $85M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.5% (USPH) to 0.4% (CWST).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $1.9B | $695M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $414M | $107M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $585,000 | $7M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $102M | $67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +17.4% | +22.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +4.5% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +0.4% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +5.5% | +9.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | +9.6% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.8% | -18.6% | -115.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AWX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.7x trailing earnings, AWX trades at a 96% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AWX's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $5.4B | $897M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $6.5B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.74x | 712.08x | 41.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 63.93x | 20.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.97x | 15.74x | 12.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 2.91x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 3.46x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.80x | 63.17x | 14.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
USPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWX delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWST. USPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWX's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWX scores 6/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | +0.5% | +1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +2.6% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +2.9% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.79x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $1.1B | $390M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $124M | $36M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $1.2B | $426M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | 1.12x | 15.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWST five years ago would be worth $12,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,610 for AWX. Over the past 12 months, AWX leads with a -7.0% total return vs CWST's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWX at -1.8% vs USPH's -17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | -13.4% | -24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.0% | -28.9% | -14.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.2% | -6.3% | -43.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.9% | +25.7% | -43.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | +1059.4% | +22.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.8% | -2.2% | -17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWX and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USPH's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs AWX's 46.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.12x | 0.32x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.43 | $121.24 | $93.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $74.05 | $58.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.6% | +70.5% | +63.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 52.8 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 874K | 171K |
Analyst Outlook
USPH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWST as "Buy", USPH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.9% upside for USPH (target: $102) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). USPH is the only dividend payer here at 3.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $119.00 | $102.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
USPH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AWX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AWX vs CWST vs USPH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AWX or CWST or USPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX). Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AWX or CWST or USPH?
On trailing P/E, Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) is the cheapest at 30.
7x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AWX or CWST or USPH?
Over the past 5 years, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) delivered a total return of +25. 7%, compared to -43. 9% for Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus USPH's +22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AWX or CWST or USPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning USPH is approximately -873% more volatile than AWX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 94% for Avalon Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AWX or CWST or USPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -0. 3% for Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. grew EPS -22. 8% year-over-year, compared to -75. 8% for Avalon Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AWX or CWST or USPH?
U.
S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus 0. 4% for Avalon Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USPH leads at 10. 3% versus 2. 4% for AWX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USPH leads at 20. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AWX or CWST or USPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, U.
S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (USPH) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 43. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USPH: 72. 9% to $102. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AWX or CWST or USPH?
In this comparison, USPH (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. AWX, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AWX or CWST or USPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, USPH: +22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AWX and CWST and USPH?
These companies operate in different sectors (AWX (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials) and USPH (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AWX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; USPH is a small-cap high-growth stock. USPH pays a dividend while AWX, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.