Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AXR vs LXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
AXR vs LXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $144M | $3.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $347M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $94M |
| Gross Margin | 73.5% | -17.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 749.6x |
| Total Debt | $68K | $1.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $170M |
AXR vs LXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMREP Corporation (AXR) | 100 | 644.9 | +544.9% |
| LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXR vs LXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs LXP's 73.6%
- Lower P/E (12.9x vs 749.6x)
- 10.5% ROA vs LXP's 2.6%, ROIC 10.2% vs 1.1%
LXP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 5.4%
- Rev growth -2.3%, EPS growth 180.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 66.9%, current ratio 85.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.3% FFO/revenue growth vs AXR's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 749.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs AXR's 24.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs AXR's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs AXR's +19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs LXP's 2.6%, ROIC 10.2% vs 1.1% |
AXR vs LXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AXR vs LXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $347M annually — 6.6x AXR's $53M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 27.0% (LXP) to 24.4% (AXR). On growth, AXR holds the edge at +93.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $347M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $162M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.5% | -17.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +46.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.8% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | -110.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AXR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, AXR trades at a 60% valuation discount to LXP's 28.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AXR's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LXP's 17.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $144M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $104M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.46x | 28.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.87x | 749.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.48x | 17.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.90x | 8.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.91x | 18.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AXR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AXR delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $5 for LXP. AXR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LXP's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LXP scores 6/9 vs AXR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$40M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $68,000 | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXR five years ago would be worth $25,541 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,643 for LXP. Over the past 12 months, LXP leads with a +38.0% total return vs AXR's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXR at 24.5% vs LXP's 7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.0% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.4% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +24.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.4% | +6.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +514.3% | +73.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | +7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
LXP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LXP is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXR's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LXP currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs AXR's 93.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.00 | $52.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $38.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 537K |
Analyst Outlook
LXP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AXR as "Buy" and LXP as "Buy". LXP is the only dividend payer here at 5.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AXR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LXP leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
AXR vs LXP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXR or LXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) is the stronger pick with -2.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for AMREP Corporation (AXR). AMREP Corporation (AXR) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMREP Corporation (AXR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXR or LXP?
On trailing P/E, AMREP Corporation (AXR) is the cheapest at 11.
5x versus LXP Industrial Trust at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, AMREP Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXR or LXP?
Over the past 5 years, AMREP Corporation (AXR) delivered a total return of +155.
4%, compared to +6. 4% for LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXR returned +514. 3% versus LXP's +73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXR or LXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus AMREP Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning AXR is approximately 88% more volatile than LXP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMREP Corporation (AXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 67% for LXP Industrial Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXR or LXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) is pulling ahead at -2.
3% versus -3. 3% for AMREP Corporation (AXR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LXP Industrial Trust grew EPS 180. 0% year-over-year, compared to 89. 6% for AMREP Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LXP leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXR or LXP?
LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 25. 6% for AMREP Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AXR leads at 24. 4% versus 14. 0% for LXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXR leads at 66. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXR or LXP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMREP Corporation (AXR) trades at 12.
9x forward P/E versus 749. 6x for LXP Industrial Trust — 736. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXR or LXP?
In this comparison, LXP (5.
4% yield) pays a dividend. AXR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AXR or LXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXP: +73. 6%, AXR: +514. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXR and LXP?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AXR is a small-cap deep-value stock; LXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. LXP pays a dividend while AXR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.