Asset Management
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
BAM vs BX vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
BAM vs BX vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $81.63B | $97.70B | $89.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.98B | $13.83B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.60B | $3.02B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 86.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 69.4% | 51.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 26.3x | 20.9x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $219M | $13.31B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $2.63B | $6M |
BAM vs BX vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Asset Ma… (BAM) | 100 | 169.6 | +69.6% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 168.1 | +68.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 217.1 | +117.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAM vs BX vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 6.7%, current ratio 0.88x
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 1.50 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 6.2%
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- Beta 1.53, yield 6.2%, current ratio 0.91x
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs BX's 487.1%
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 20.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 20.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.50 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.2% vs KKR's -10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs KKR's 0.4% |
BAM vs BX vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BAM vs BX vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 4.8x BAM's $4.0B. BAM is the more profitable business, keeping 54.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KKR's 12.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $13.8B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.0B | $7.2B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $3.5B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.0% | +86.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +51.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +54.5% | +21.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +12.6% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.8% | +41.3% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.1x trailing earnings, BX trades at a 25% valuation discount to KKR's 43.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BX's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAM's 29.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81.6B | $97.7B | $89.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $81.8B | $108.4B | $144.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.00x | 32.14x | 43.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.31x | 20.89x | 16.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.48x | 15.02x | 20.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.51x | 7.07x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.90x | 4.45x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 130.19x | 55.99x | 9.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BAM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAM delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. BAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KKR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs BAM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | +14.3% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.8% | +6.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +71.0% | +16.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +103.0% | +16.9% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.61x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $207M | $10.7B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $2.6B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $219M | $13.3B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.00x | 14.12x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KKR five years ago would be worth $18,046 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for BX. Over the past 12 months, BX leads with a -3.2% total return vs KKR's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 27.8% vs BAM's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | -19.8% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.3% | -3.2% | -10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +68.9% | +108.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.8% | +64.8% | +80.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.8% | +487.1% | +711.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +19.1% | +27.8% |
Risk & Volatility
BAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAM is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAM currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.53x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.10 | $190.09 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.20 | $101.73 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.9% | +65.6% | +65.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 51.8 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 7.2M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BAM as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.9% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs 25.3% for BX (target: $156). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.18% vs BAM's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.83 | $156.29 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +6.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $7.70 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
BAM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KKR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
BAM vs BX vs KKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAM or BX or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the better valuation at 32. 1x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAM or BX or KKR?
On trailing P/E, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the cheapest at 32. 1x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, KKR & Co. Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAM or BX or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) delivered a total return of +80. 5%, compared to +64. 8% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +711. 5% versus BAM's +67. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAM or BX or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 50β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 14% more volatile than BAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 67% for KKR & Co. Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAM or BX or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. grew EPS 10. 5% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAM or BX or KKR?
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) is the more profitable company, earning 54. 5% net margin versus 12. 3% for KKR & Co. Inc. — meaning it keeps 54. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BAM leads at 69. 4% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAM or BX or KKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 41. 9% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAM or BX or KKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 8% for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM).
09Is BAM or BX or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6. 2% yield, +487. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BX: +487. 1%, BAM: +67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAM and BX and KKR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BAM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.