Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BAND vs EGHT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
BAND vs EGHT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.49B | $337M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209.36B | $728M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.11B | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 37.3% | 65.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $701M | $410M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $88M |
BAND vs EGHT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| 8x8, Inc. (EGHT) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAND vs EGHT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.7%, EPS growth -79.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 132.3% 10Y total return vs EGHT's -79.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.86, current ratio 1.39x
EGHT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.49
- Beta 1.49, current ratio 1.20x
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 26.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.7% revenue growth vs EGHT's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.0% margin vs EGHT's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs BAND's 1.86 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +278.3% vs EGHT's +38.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs EGHT's -0.6%, ROIC -1.2% vs 2.5% |
BAND vs EGHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAND vs EGHT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EGHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 287.8x EGHT's $728M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.0% (BAND) to -0.5% (EGHT). On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $209.4B | $728M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4.6B | $48M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.1B | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +65.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1197.2% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.8% | +59.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EGHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EGHT's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAND's 48.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $337M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $659M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -108.02x | -11.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.12x | 6.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 48.74x | 12.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.97x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.48x | 2.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.02x | 6.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EGHT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAND delivers a 4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EGHT. BAND carries lower financial leverage with a 1.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGHT's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EGHT scores 5/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.75x | 3.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $598M | $322M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $701M | $410M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.30x | 0.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BAND five years ago would be worth $3,808 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $823 for EGHT. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +278.3% total return vs EGHT's +38.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 60.2% vs EGHT's -6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +226.7% | +28.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +278.3% | +38.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +311.1% | -16.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.9% | -91.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.3% | -79.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.2% | -6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAND and EGHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGHT is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs EGHT's 84.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.00 | $2.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.93 | $1.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 93.7 | 75.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 657K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BAND as "Buy" and EGHT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 716.9% upside for EGHT (target: $20) vs -1.0% for BAND (target: $46).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $19.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EGHT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
BAND vs EGHT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAND or EGHT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bandwidth Inc.
(BAND) is the stronger pick with 0. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Analysts rate Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BAND or EGHT?
Over the past 5 years, Bandwidth Inc.
(BAND) delivered a total return of -61. 9%, compared to -91. 8% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAND returned +132. 3% versus EGHT's -79. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BAND or EGHT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 8x8, Inc.
(EGHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 25% more volatile than EGHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 175% versus 3% for 8x8, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BAND or EGHT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bandwidth Inc.
(BAND) is pulling ahead at 0. 7% versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 8x8, Inc. grew EPS 62. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BAND leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BAND or EGHT?
Bandwidth Inc.
(BAND) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 7% net margin versus -3. 8% for 8x8, Inc. — meaning it keeps -1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EGHT leads at 2. 1% versus -1. 9% for BAND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EGHT leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BAND or EGHT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, 8x8, Inc.
(EGHT) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Bandwidth Inc. — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGHT: 716. 9% to $19. 77.
07Which pays a better dividend — BAND or EGHT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BAND or EGHT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 8x8, Inc.
(EGHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGHT: -79. 2%, BAND: +132. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BAND and EGHT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.