Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.80B | $10.44B | $4.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $909M | $3.36B | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $238M | $537M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 57.1% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 30.3% | 19.8% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 15.7x | 13.3x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $4.45B | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.55B | $1.43B | $763M |
BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 300.4 | +200.4% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.5%
- 322.5% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 172.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 0.33x
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 16.0x)
- +47.4% vs BANF's -3.5%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BOKF's 10.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANF's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs BOKF's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs BANF's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.4% vs BANF's -3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANF's 0.4% |
BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BOKF leads 2 • BANF leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.5x FFIN's $739M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $909M | $3.4B | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $324M | $797M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $238M | $537M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $196M | $1.5B | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.5% | +57.1% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +19.8% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +15.6% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +42.6% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +1.8% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BOKF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, BOKF trades at a 20% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANF offers better value at 1.83x vs BOKF's 5.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $10.4B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $336M | $13.5B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.78x | 16.65x | 20.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.66x | 13.25x | 16.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.83x | 5.60x | 4.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.13x | 17.44x | 14.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.19x | 3.11x | 6.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 1.56x | 2.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.94x | 7.30x | 15.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOKF scores 6/9 vs BANF's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +8.9% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +4.1% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | +5.5% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.80x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.5B | $3.0B | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $1.4B | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $4.5B | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | 0.55x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANF five years ago would be worth $16,843 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,104 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +47.4% total return vs BANF's -3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOKF at 22.1% vs FFIN's 9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.0% | +14.7% | +9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.5% | +47.4% | -2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +82.1% | +29.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.4% | +62.2% | -29.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +322.5% | +172.7% | +146.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.4% | +22.1% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BANF and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANF is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.03x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $138.77 | $139.73 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $101.48 | $91.35 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.5% | +97.0% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 56.8 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 139K | 318K | 735K |
Analyst Outlook
FFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BANF as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -17.0% for BANF (target: $95). For income investors, FFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.20% vs BANF's 1.50%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $95.00 | $131.57 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 21 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.72 | $2.24 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). BOKF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BANF or BOKF or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BancFirst Corporation (BANF) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the cheapest at 16.
7x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, BOK Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BancFirst Corporation wins at 1. 61x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) delivered a total return of +68.
4%, compared to -29. 0% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +322. 5% versus FFIN's +146. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
93β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 11% more volatile than BANF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus 10. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BANF or BOKF or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 61x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 20. 4% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 5% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is BANF or BOKF or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
93), 1. 5% yield, +322. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +322. 5%, BOKF: +172. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BANF and BOKF and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.