Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BAP vs BBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BAP vs BBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $25.51B | $39.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27.00B | $342.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.47B | $23.21B |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 34.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 3.4x | 1.4x |
| Total Debt | $37.49B | $798.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47.51B | $160.84B |
BAP vs BBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) | 100 | 233.3 | +133.3% |
| Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAP vs BBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 4.1%
- 181.0% 10Y total return vs BBD's 57.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 0.53x
BBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 37.1%, EPS growth 34.4%
- PEG 0.17 vs BAP's 0.64
- 37.1% NII/revenue growth vs BAP's 6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.1% NII/revenue growth vs BAP's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 3.4x), PEG 0.17 vs 0.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BBD's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs BBD's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BAP's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.0% vs BAP's +66.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BBD's 0.4% |
BAP vs BBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $342.2B annually — 12.7x BAP's $27.0B. BAP is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBD's 6.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.0B | $342.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.4B | -$1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.5B | $23.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.6B | -$201.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +34.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +49.7% | -92.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | +46.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BBD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, BBD trades at a 48% valuation discount to BAP's 16.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BBD offers better value at 1.04x vs BAP's 3.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.5B | $39.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.6B | $168.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.11x | 8.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.37x | 1.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.08x | 1.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.16x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.27x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.53x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.59x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BAP leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAP delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $13 for BBD. BAP carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBD's 4.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAP scores 8/9 vs BBD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 4.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10.0B | $637.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47.5B | $160.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37.5B | $798.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.99x | -0.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BAP five years ago would be worth $29,447 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,552 for BBD. Over the past 12 months, BBD leads with a +76.0% total return vs BAP's +66.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAP at 33.7% vs BBD's 13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.2% | +12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.0% | +76.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.9% | +44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.5% | +15.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +181.0% | +57.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.7% | +13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAP and BBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBD's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $380.20 | $4.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $193.13 | $2.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.6% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 358K | 38.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BAP and BBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BAP as "Hold" and BBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.9% upside for BAP (target: $408) vs -14.4% for BBD (target: $3). For income investors, BBD offers the higher dividend yield at 6.04% vs BAP's 4.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $408.00 | $3.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +6.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $46.03 | $1.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.1% |
BAP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BBD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BAP vs BBD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAP or BBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Banco Bradesco S.
A. (BBD) is the stronger pick with 37. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAP or BBD?
On trailing P/E, Banco Bradesco S.
A. (BBD) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Credicorp Ltd. at 16. 1x. On forward P/E, Banco Bradesco S. A. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banco Bradesco S. A. wins at 0. 17x versus Credicorp Ltd. 's 0. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAP or BBD?
Over the past 5 years, Credicorp Ltd.
(BAP) delivered a total return of +194. 5%, compared to +15. 5% for Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAP returned +181. 0% versus BBD's +57. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAP or BBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Credicorp Ltd.
(BAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Banco Bradesco S. A. 's 1. 15β — meaning BBD is approximately 42% more volatile than BAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 4% for Banco Bradesco S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAP or BBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banco Bradesco S.
A. (BBD) is pulling ahead at 37. 1% versus 6. 4% for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco Bradesco S. A. grew EPS 34. 4% year-over-year, compared to 13. 1% for Credicorp Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAP or BBD?
Credicorp Ltd.
(BAP) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 6. 8% for Banco Bradesco S. A. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BAP leads at 29. 0% versus -1. 1% for BBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAP leads at 64. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAP or BBD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Credicorp Ltd. 's 0. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 3. 4x for Credicorp Ltd. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAP: 26. 9% to $408. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAP or BBD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banco Bradesco S. A. (BBD) offers the highest yield at 6. 0%, versus 4. 1% for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP).
09Is BAP or BBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Credicorp Ltd.
(BAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 4. 1% yield, +181. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAP: +181. 0%, BBD: +57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAP and BBD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BAP is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BBD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.