REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BFS vs NXRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
BFS vs NXRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $838M | $758M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $283M | $252M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 91.1% |
| Operating Margin | 51.2% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 60.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.53B | $1.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $14M |
BFS vs NXRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.3 | -6.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFS vs NXRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth -5.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 0.24x
- 4.5% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 211.0% 10Y total return vs BFS's -2.6%
- Beta 0.62, yield 7.1%, current ratio 0.48x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs NXRT's 0.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs BFS's 6.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.9% vs NXRT's -15.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.7% vs 1.1% |
BFS vs NXRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BFS vs NXRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFS and NXRT operate at a comparable scale, with $283M and $252M in trailing revenue. BFS is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, BFS holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $283M | $252M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $202M | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $106M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +91.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | -12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +31.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.3% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BFS's 13.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $838M | $758M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.99x | -23.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 60.02x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.74x | 18.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.12x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 2.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.91x | 9.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BFS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BFS delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. BFS carries lower financial leverage with a 3.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.06x | 5.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.26x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BFS five years ago would be worth $10,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,826 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, BFS leads with a +10.9% total return vs NXRT's -15.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFS at 7.7% vs NXRT's -5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.1% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | -15.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.8% | -15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.9% | -21.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.6% | +211.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXRT's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFS currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs NXRT's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.75 | $38.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.16 | $23.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +77.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 69.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 219K |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BFS as "Hold" and NXRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.2% upside for BFS (target: $44) vs -9.5% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.06% vs BFS's 6.89%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.9% | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.36 | $2.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
BFS leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NXRT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
BFS vs NXRT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFS or NXRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (60. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BFS or NXRT?
Over the past 5 years, Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) delivered a total return of +3. 9%, compared to -21. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 0% versus BFS's -2. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BFS or NXRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning NXRT is approximately 94% more volatile than BFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BFS or NXRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Saul Centers, Inc. grew EPS -5. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFS leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BFS or NXRT?
Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 8% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BFS leads at 45. 1% versus 11. 1% for NXRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BFS or NXRT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFS: 27.
2% to $43. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BFS or NXRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 6. 9% for Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS).
08Is BFS or NXRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Saul Centers, Inc.
(BFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 6. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BFS: -2. 6%, NXRT: +211. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BFS and NXRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.