BHP vs RIO

For growth investors, Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the stronger pick with -0.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for BHP Group Limited (BHP). Rio Tinto Group (RIO) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BHP Group Limited (BHP) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the cheapest at 14.

6x versus BHP Group Limited at 23. 2x. On forward P/E, Rio Tinto Group is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Rio Tinto Group wins at 1. 64x versus BHP Group Limited's 5. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, BHP Group Limited (BHP) delivered a total return of +45.

5%, compared to +40. 4% for Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIO returned +430. 0% versus BHP's +391. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

98β versus BHP Group Limited's 1. 22β — meaning BHP is approximately 25% more volatile than RIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rio Tinto Group (RIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 47% for BHP Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is pulling ahead at -0.

7% versus -7. 9% for BHP Group Limited (BHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rio Tinto Group grew EPS 14. 8% year-over-year, compared to 14. 1% for BHP Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RIO leads at -5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

5% net margin versus 17. 6% for BHP Group Limited — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BHP leads at 38. 0% versus 29. 2% for RIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BHP leads at 82. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus BHP Group Limited's 5. 82x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Rio Tinto Group (RIO) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for BHP Group Limited — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RIO: -1. 3% to $101. 75.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 3. 0% for BHP Group Limited (BHP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

98), 4. 2% yield, +430. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIO: +430. 0%, BHP: +391. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BHP is a large-cap income-oriented stock; RIO is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.