Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BMRA vs OSUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
BMRA vs OSUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $7M | $220M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 5.6% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | -118.1% | -58.6% |
| Total Debt | $458K | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $199K |
BMRA vs OSUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biomerica, Inc. (BMRA) | 100 | 4.3 | -95.7% |
| OraSure Technologie… (OSUR) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMRA vs OSUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMRA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.95
- Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth -5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -34.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 11.2%, current ratio 2.80x
OSUR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -54.1% 10Y total return vs BMRA's -81.9%
- -61.9% margin vs BMRA's -90.3%
- +17.7% vs BMRA's -35.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs OSUR's -38.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -61.9% margin vs BMRA's -90.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs OSUR's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs BMRA's -35.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.8% ROA vs BMRA's -66.7%, ROIC -20.0% vs -143.5% |
BMRA vs OSUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BMRA vs OSUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSUR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $85M annually — 19.1x BMRA's $4M. OSUR is the more profitable business, keeping -61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BMRA's -90.3%. On growth, BMRA holds the edge at -26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +38.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -118.1% | -58.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -90.3% | -61.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -65.7% | -56.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.0% | -99.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.1% | -52.4% |
Valuation Metrics
OSUR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $220M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $233M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.03x | -3.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.23x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OSUR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSUR delivers a -15.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-15 in annual profit, vs $-91 for BMRA. OSUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMRA's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMRA scores 4/9 vs OSUR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -90.8% | -15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -66.7% | -12.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -143.5% | -20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -91.3% | -16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $199,278 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $458,000 | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSUR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSUR five years ago would be worth $3,145 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $674 for BMRA. Over the past 12 months, OSUR leads with a +17.7% total return vs BMRA's -35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSUR at -24.1% vs BMRA's -40.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.3% | +28.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.8% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | -56.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | -68.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | -54.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.8% | -24.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BMRA and OSUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSUR's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSUR currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs BMRA's 48.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.60 | $3.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.87 | $2.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.3% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 469K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.8% |
OSUR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BMRA vs OSUR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMRA or OSUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Biomerica, Inc.
(BMRA) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 1% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). Analysts rate OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) a "Hold" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BMRA or OSUR?
Over the past 5 years, OraSure Technologies, Inc.
(OSUR) delivered a total return of -68. 6%, compared to -93. 3% for Biomerica, Inc. (BMRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSUR returned -54. 1% versus BMRA's -81. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BMRA or OSUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biomerica, Inc.
(BMRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus OraSure Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning OSUR is approximately 51% more volatile than BMRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 11% for Biomerica, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BMRA or OSUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Biomerica, Inc.
(BMRA) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -38. 1% for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OraSure Technologies, Inc. grew EPS -261. 5% year-over-year, compared to -500. 0% for Biomerica, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSUR leads at -33. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BMRA or OSUR?
OraSure Technologies, Inc.
(OSUR) is the more profitable company, earning -59. 8% net margin versus -93. 6% for Biomerica, Inc. — meaning it keeps -59. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OSUR leads at -59. 2% versus -96. 7% for BMRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSUR leads at 41. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BMRA or OSUR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BMRA or OSUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Biomerica, Inc.
(BMRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMRA: -81. 9%, OSUR: -54. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BMRA and OSUR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.