Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
BWFG vs NBTB vs CTBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BWFG vs NBTB vs CTBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $417M | $2.36B | $1.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $867M | $376M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $169M | $93M |
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 72.1% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 25.3% | 28.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 10.8x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $180M | $327M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $185M | $370M |
BWFG vs NBTB vs CTBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 357.5 | +257.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| Community Trust Ban… (CTBI) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWFG vs NBTB vs CTBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 178.0% 10Y total return vs CTBI's 132.7%
- PEG 0.23 vs CTBI's 2.25
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.23 vs 2.25
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs BWFG's 2.9%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs BWFG's 1.5%
CTBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 42.3%, current ratio 0.27x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% NII/revenue growth vs BWFG's 6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.23 vs 2.25 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs BWFG's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.9% vs NBTB's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
BWFG vs NBTB vs CTBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BWFG vs NBTB vs CTBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BWFG leads in 2 of 6 categories
CTBI leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 4.2x BWFG's $208M. CTBI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWFG's 16.9%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $867M | $376M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $53M | $241M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $169M | $93M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $225M | $104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +72.1% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +25.3% | +28.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +19.5% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +25.2% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +39.5% | +7.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BWFG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 18% valuation discount to CTBI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.28x vs CTBI's 2.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $417M | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $372M | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.76x | 13.57x | 14.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.66x | 10.83x | 10.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 1.93x | 2.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.08x | 10.38x | 10.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 2.72x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.21x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.97x | 10.78x | 12.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BWFG and NBTB and CTBI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWFG delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWFG's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CTBI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +9.5% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +7.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +2.4% | +12.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.17x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$45M | $142M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $185M | $370M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180M | $327M | $320M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $19,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,950 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +58.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWFG at 34.9% vs NBTB's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.6% | +9.6% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.9% | +9.3% | +36.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.4% | +54.5% | +111.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.1% | +29.5% | +66.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.0% | +102.2% | +132.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.9% | +15.6% | +28.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWFG and CTBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 0.89x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.86 | $46.92 | $68.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.20 | $39.20 | $49.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +96.3% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 54.2 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 234K | 91K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BWFG as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CTBI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.8% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -8.0% for CTBI (target: $61). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.16% vs BWFG's 1.53%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +3.2% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.43 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
BWFG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CTBI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BWFG vs NBTB vs CTBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWFG or NBTB or CTBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 1% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWFG or NBTB or CTBI?
On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWFG or NBTB or CTBI?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +96. 1%, compared to +29. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +178. 0% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWFG or NBTB or CTBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 8% more volatile than CTBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 60% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWFG or NBTB or CTBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus 6. 1% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 5. 7% for Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWFG or NBTB or CTBI?
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 16. 9% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTBI leads at 28. 4% versus 23. 3% for BWFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWFG or NBTB or CTBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 1. 8% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWFG or NBTB or CTBI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 5% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is BWFG or NBTB or CTBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 1. 5% yield, +178. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWFG: +178. 0%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWFG and NBTB and CTBI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.