Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BX vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
BX vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $96.16B | $90.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.83B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.02B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | 86.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 51.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.6x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $13.31B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.63B | $6M |
BX vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 216.1 | +116.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 367.6 | +267.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BX vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 6.3%
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 60.8%, current ratio 0.91x
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BX's 478.0%
- Lower P/E (16.7x vs 20.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.7x vs 20.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs KKR's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.2% vs KKR's -10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs KKR's 0.4% |
BX vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BX vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR and BX operate at a comparable scale, with $19.3B and $13.8B in trailing revenue. BX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KKR's 12.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.8B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.2B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.5B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.3% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.6x trailing earnings, BX trades at a 27% valuation discount to KKR's 43.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BX's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96.2B | $90.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $106.8B | $145.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.63x | 43.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.56x | 16.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.81x | 20.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.95x | 4.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.38x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.11x | 9.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. BX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KKR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs BX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.9% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.7B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.3B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.12x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KKR five years ago would be worth $18,121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,301 for BX. Over the past 12 months, BX leads with a -6.2% total return vs KKR's -10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 26.4% vs BX's 18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.2% | -10.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.4% | +102.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.0% | +81.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +478.0% | +720.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.0% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BX is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $190.09 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $101.73 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.3M | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BX as "Buy" and KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs 27.4% for BX (target: $156). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.27% vs KKR's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $156.29 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.3% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.70 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.1% |
BX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KKR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
BX vs KKR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BX or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the better valuation at 31. 6x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blackstone Inc. (BX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BX or KKR?
On trailing P/E, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the cheapest at 31. 6x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, KKR & Co. Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BX or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) delivered a total return of +81. 2%, compared to +63. 0% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +720. 7% versus BX's +478. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BX or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 11% more volatile than BX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 67% for KKR & Co. Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BX or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BX or KKR?
Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 12. 3% for KKR & Co. Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BX or KKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) trades at 16. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for Blackstone Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 40. 2% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BX or KKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is BX or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +720. 7% 10Y return). Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KKR: +720. 7%, BX: +478. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BX and KKR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.