Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CBNK vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CBNK vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $516M | $175M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $304M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 73.6% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $25M |
CBNK vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Bancorp, In… (CBNK) | 100 | 277.8 | +177.8% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 176.0 | +76.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBNK vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBNK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 60.4%
- 158.8% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 128.0%
MNSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
- Beta 0.66
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CBNK's 0.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.1% vs CBNK's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% |
CBNK vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBNK vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBNK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $304M annually — 2.2x MNSB's $136M. CBNK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $304M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $67M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.6% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +102.2% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CBNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CBNK trades at a 30% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBNK's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $516M | $175M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $537M | $220M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.30x | 13.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.31x | 10.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.30x | 11.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.70x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.65x | 16.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. CBNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBNK scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.6% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.16x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBNK five years ago would be worth $14,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,864 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +24.1% total return vs CBNK's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBNK at 27.9% vs MNSB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.2% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.1% | +24.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +20.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.8% | +18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.8% | +128.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.9% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBNK's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs CBNK's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.40 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.40 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
CBNK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CBNK as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". CBNK is the only dividend payer here at 1.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | 0.0% |
CBNK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNSB leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
CBNK vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBNK or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBNK or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBNK or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) delivered a total return of +48. 8%, compared to +18. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBNK returned +158. 8% versus MNSB's +128. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBNK or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Capital Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning CBNK is approximately 32% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBNK or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 60. 4% for Capital Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBNK or MNSB?
Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 8% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBNK leads at 23. 3% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBNK leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBNK or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBNK or MNSB?
In this comparison, CBNK (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CBNK or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 1. 4% yield, +158. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBNK: +158. 8%, MNSB: +128. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBNK and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBNK is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. CBNK pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.