Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CCC vs VRSK vs GWRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Software - Application
CCC vs VRSK vs GWRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Consulting Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $3.06B | $22.89B | $11.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.09B | $3.10B | $1.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $910M | $189M |
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 67.4% | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 44.9% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 22.9x | 39.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.39B | $5.04B | $716M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $2.18B | $699M |
CCC vs VRSK vs GWRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCC Intelligent Sol… (CCC) | 100 | 22.8 | -77.2% |
| Verisk Analytics, I… (VRSK) | 100 | 101.2 | +1.2% |
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCC vs VRSK vs GWRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.09
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 39.7x)
VRSK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.
- 29.3% margin vs CCC's 3.2%
- 1.0% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
- 16.7% ROA vs CCC's 1.0%, ROIC 33.0% vs 2.5%
GWRE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth 11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 151.9% 10Y total return vs CCC's 15.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 49.1%, current ratio 2.77x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.6% revenue growth vs VRSK's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 39.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs CCC's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs CCC's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -34.5% vs VRSK's -43.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.7% ROA vs CCC's 1.0%, ROIC 33.0% vs 2.5% |
CCC vs VRSK vs GWRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCC vs VRSK vs GWRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRSK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 2.9x CCC's $1.1B. VRSK is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCC's 3.2%. On growth, GWRE holds the edge at +24.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $3.1B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $285M | $1.7B | $103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $910M | $189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $358M | $1.1B | $310M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.1% | +67.4% | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +44.9% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +29.3% | +14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +36.3% | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +3.9% | +24.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +186.4% | +4.8% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, VRSK trades at a 100% valuation discount to CCC's 8683.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VRSK's 15.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GWRE's 182.3x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $22.9B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $25.7B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8683.33x | 26.92x | 172.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | 22.85x | 39.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.75x | 15.34x | 182.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 7.45x | 9.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 78.44x | 8.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.01x | 19.20x | 39.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GWRE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $2 for CCC. GWRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRSK's 16.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWRE scores 7/9 vs CCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +4.4% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +16.7% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +33.0% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +39.6% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 16.26x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $2.9B | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $2.2B | $699M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $5.0B | $716M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | 7.87x | 388.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GWRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GWRE five years ago would be worth $14,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,010 for CCC. Over the past 12 months, GWRE leads with a -34.5% total return vs VRSK's -43.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GWRE at 21.6% vs CCC's -16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.8% | -20.7% | -25.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.9% | -43.0% | -34.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -14.5% | +79.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | +1.8% | +41.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1580.6% | +137.1% | +151.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.9% | -5.1% | +21.6% |
Risk & Volatility
VRSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRSK is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCC's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRSK currently trades 54.1% from its 52-week high vs CCC's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | -0.04x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.50 | $322.92 | $272.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.58 | $161.70 | $115.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +54.1% | +51.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 39.5 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.8M | 1.9M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
VRSK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCC as "Buy", VRSK as "Hold", GWRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.0% upside for CCC (target: $9) vs 32.4% for VRSK (target: $231). VRSK is the only dividend payer here at 1.03% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.17 | $231.25 | $245.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 25 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.81 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +19.6% | +2.7% | 0.0% |
VRSK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). GWRE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
CCC vs VRSK vs GWRE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCC or VRSK or GWRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the stronger pick with 22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (CCC) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCC or VRSK or GWRE?
On trailing P/E, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. at 8683. 3x. On forward P/E, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCC or VRSK or GWRE?
Over the past 5 years, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) delivered a total return of +41. 4%, compared to -49. 9% for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (CCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCC returned +1581% versus VRSK's +137. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCC or VRSK or GWRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning CCC is approximately -3136% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guidewire Software, Inc. (GWRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCC or VRSK or GWRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is pulling ahead at 22. 6% versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to -98. 5% for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GWRE leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCC or VRSK or GWRE?
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRSK leads at 44. 6% versus 3. 4% for GWRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCC leads at 73. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCC or VRSK or GWRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.
(CCC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Guidewire Software, Inc. — 27. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCC: 76. 0% to $9. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCC or VRSK or GWRE?
In this comparison, VRSK (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CCC, GWRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCC or VRSK or GWRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, GWRE: +151. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCC and VRSK and GWRE?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCC (Technology) and VRSK (Industrials) and GWRE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. VRSK pays a dividend while CCC, GWRE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.