Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CGBD vs ARCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
CGBD vs ARCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $866M | $13.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $168M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 59.2% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | 54.7% | 69.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $968M | $15.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $924M |
CGBD vs ARCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carlyle Secured Len… (CGBD) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 129.9 | +29.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGBD vs ARCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, current ratio 2.67x
- PEG 0.90 vs ARCC's 0.97
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -23.8%
- 139.7% 10Y total return vs CGBD's 48.4%
- 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs CGBD's -2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs CGBD's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 10.0x), PEG 0.90 vs 0.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ARCC's 0.1% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs ARCC's 0.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs CGBD's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.9% vs CGBD's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs ARCC's 0.1% |
CGBD vs ARCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CGBD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 18.7x CGBD's $168M. CGBD is the more profitable business, keeping 53.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARCC's 41.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $168M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $76M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.2% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +69.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +53.0% | +41.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +62.2% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | -63.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CGBD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, CGBD trades at a 27% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CGBD offers better value at 0.82x vs ARCC's 1.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $866M | $13.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $28.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.52x | 10.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.20x | 10.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | 1.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.67x | 13.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.16x | 4.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.31x | 12.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARCC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARCC delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for CGBD. CGBD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARCC's 1.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CGBD scores 6/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $938M | $15.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $924M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $968M | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 2.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CGBD five years ago would be worth $15,130 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,948 for ARCC. Over the past 12 months, ARCC leads with a +1.9% total return vs CGBD's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCC at 10.6% vs CGBD's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.2% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.3% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.8% | +35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.3% | +49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +139.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CGBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CGBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.49 | $23.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.61 | $17.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 805K | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ARCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CGBD as "Hold" and ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.3% upside for CGBD (target: $15) vs 14.2% for ARCC (target: $22). For income investors, ARCC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.00% vs CGBD's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $21.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CGBD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARCC leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
CGBD vs ARCC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGBD or ARCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGBD or ARCC?
On trailing P/E, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 3x. On forward P/E, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. wins at 0. 90x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGBD or ARCC?
Over the past 5 years, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) delivered a total return of +51. 3%, compared to +49. 5% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 7% versus CGBD's +48. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGBD or ARCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 25% more volatile than CGBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 112% for Ares Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGBD or ARCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus -2. 9% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. grew EPS -3. 7% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGBD or ARCC?
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.
(CGBD) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus 41. 3% for Ares Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARCC leads at 69. 7% versus 54. 7% for CGBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CGBD or ARCC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Ares Capital Corporation — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGBD: 26. 3% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CGBD or ARCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 2% for Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD).
09Is CGBD or ARCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
77), 2. 0% yield, +139. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARCC: +139. 7%, CGBD: +48. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CGBD and ARCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CGBD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ARCC pays a dividend while CGBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.