Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $322M | $203M | $244M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $90M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $14M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 54.7% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.2% | 7.0% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 11.8x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $52M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $119M | $78M |
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 264.8 | +164.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.3 | +186.3% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 272.6 | +172.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- +49.4% vs FUNC's +27.7%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs CHMG's 0.73
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 283.2% 10Y total return vs CHMG's 191.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 9.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs CHMG's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs CHMG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.4% vs FUNC's +27.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 5 of 6 categories
CHMG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 1.6x CZWI's $90M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $90M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $9M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $14M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $11M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +54.7% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +7.0% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +16.0% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +11.5% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.8% | +63.0% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 44% valuation discount to CHMG's 21.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.06x vs CZWI's 2.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $322M | $203M | $244M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $305M | $136M | $353M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.42x | 14.41x | 11.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.38x | 11.75x | 8.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.84x | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.28x | 15.24x | 11.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 2.25x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.27x | 1.09x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 159.23x | 19.51x | 11.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +7.8% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +2.0% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +0.6% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.28x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | -$67M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $119M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $52M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.16x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,974 for CHMG. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +49.4% total return vs FUNC's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 46.3% vs CHMG's 26.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.7% | +21.3% | +2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.4% | +42.9% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.9% | +159.5% | +213.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | +73.4% | +129.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.5% | +156.6% | +283.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +37.4% | +46.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHMG and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHMG's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHMG currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 89.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.46x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.83 | $22.62 | $41.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.20 | $12.83 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +93.0% | +89.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 66.5 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 41K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHMG as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -25.4% upside for CHMG (target: $50) vs -33.4% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FUNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | — | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.8% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $0.37 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.7% |
FUNC leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHMG or CZWI or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +129.
8%, compared to +69. 7% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus CZWI's +156. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Chemung Financial Corporation's 0. 73β — meaning CHMG is approximately 60% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHMG or CZWI or FUNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHMG: -25. 4% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CHMG or CZWI or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +156. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +156. 6%, CHMG: +191. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHMG and CZWI and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.