REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHMI vs TWO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
CHMI vs TWO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $95M | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $765M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-343M |
| Gross Margin | 83.3% | 88.0% |
| Operating Margin | 70.9% | 57.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.29B | $8.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $842M |
CHMI vs TWO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cherry Hill Mortgag… (CHMI) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Two Harbors Investm… (TWO) | 100 | 68.5 | -31.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHMI vs TWO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHMI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.75
- Rev growth 204.8%, EPS growth -246.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.9%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs TWO's -5.8%
TWO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.49, yield 13.4%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.49 vs CHMI's 0.75, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 204.8% FFO/revenue growth vs TWO's -28.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs TWO's -44.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs CHMI's 0.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.1% vs CHMI's +3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.5% ROA vs TWO's -3.0%, ROIC 4.9% vs 3.1% |
CHMI vs TWO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CHMI vs TWO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHMI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWO is the larger business by revenue, generating $765M annually — 19.0x CHMI's $40M. CHMI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWO's -44.8%. On growth, CHMI holds the edge at +31.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $765M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $70M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$343M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.3% | +88.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +57.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | -44.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | -8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.0% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.7% | +120.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CHMI leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CHMI's 22.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWO's 197.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $95M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.80x | -2.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.52x | 197.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHMI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHMI delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TWO. TWO carries lower financial leverage with a 4.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHMI's 5.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHMI scores 4/9 vs TWO's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | -19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.39x | 4.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $842M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 0.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWO five years ago would be worth $8,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,314 for CHMI. Over the past 12 months, TWO leads with a +18.1% total return vs CHMI's +3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWO at 13.4% vs CHMI's -7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.1% | +18.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +45.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.9% | -17.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | -5.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.4% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TWO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TWO is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHMI's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWO currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs CHMI's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.31 | $14.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.17 | $8.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 71.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 195K | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TWO is the only dividend payer here at 13.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +13.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
CHMI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TWO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
CHMI vs TWO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHMI or TWO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI) is the stronger pick with 204.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 4% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Analysts rate Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CHMI or TWO?
Over the past 5 years, Two Harbors Investment Corp.
(TWO) delivered a total return of -17. 9%, compared to -36. 9% for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMI returned +5. 0% versus TWO's -6. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CHMI or TWO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Two Harbors Investment Corp.
(TWO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation's 0. 75β — meaning CHMI is approximately 52% more volatile than TWO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 5% for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CHMI or TWO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI) is pulling ahead at 204.
8% versus -28. 4% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation grew EPS -246. 4% year-over-year, compared to -284. 0% for Two Harbors Investment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWO leads at 263. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CHMI or TWO?
Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
5% net margin versus -75. 0% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TWO leads at 68. 7% versus 55. 9% for CHMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TWO leads at 97. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CHMI or TWO?
In this comparison, TWO (13.
4% yield) pays a dividend. CHMI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CHMI or TWO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Two Harbors Investment Corp.
(TWO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 13. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWO: -6. 6%, CHMI: +5. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CHMI and TWO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHMI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. TWO pays a dividend while CHMI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.