Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CPB vs HRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
CPB vs HRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $6.25B | $11.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.04B | $12.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $550M | $489M |
| Gross Margin | 29.3% | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $7.21B | $2.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $132M | $671M |
CPB vs HRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.1 | -58.9% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 42.4 | -57.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPB vs HRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.02, yield 7.3%
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- Beta -0.02, yield 7.3%, current ratio 0.77x
HRL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -21.7% 10Y total return vs CPB's -44.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 36.1%, current ratio 2.47x
- Lower D/E ratio (36.1% vs 184.7%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs HRL's 1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs HRL's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (36.1% vs 184.7%) | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HRL's 5.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.0% vs CPB's -36.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs CPB's 3.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 9.1% |
CPB vs HRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPB vs HRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRL and CPB operate at a comparable scale, with $12.1B and $10.0B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (CPB) to 4.0% (HRL). On growth, HRL holds the edge at +1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.0B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $932M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $550M | $489M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $919M | $578M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +15.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.2% | +6.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CPB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, CPB trades at a 56% valuation discount to HRL's 23.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CPB's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HRL's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.2B | $11.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.43x | 23.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.60x | 14.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.46x | 13.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.86x | 21.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPB delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $4 for HRL. HRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPB's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs HRL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.0% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.1B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $132M | $671M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.14x | 6.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPB five years ago would be worth $5,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,520 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, HRL leads with a -25.0% total return vs CPB's -36.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRL at -16.0% vs CPB's -22.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.5% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.6% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.1% | -40.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.8% | -44.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.5% | -21.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.3% | -16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPB and HRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPB is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HRL's 0.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HRL currently trades 65.0% from its 52-week high vs CPB's 58.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.16 | $31.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.76 | $20.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.0% | +65.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.2M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPB and HRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CPB as "Hold" and HRL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.6% upside for HRL (target: $27) vs 23.2% for CPB (target: $26). For income investors, CPB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.30% vs HRL's 5.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.83 | $27.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.3% | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.53 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% |
CPB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HRL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
CPB vs HRL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPB or HRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger pick with 6.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 6% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Campbell Soup Company (CPB) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Campbell Soup Company (CPB) a "Hold" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPB or HRL?
On trailing P/E, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Hormel Foods Corporation at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Campbell Soup Company is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPB or HRL?
Over the past 5 years, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) delivered a total return of -42.
8%, compared to -44. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRL returned -21. 7% versus CPB's -44. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPB or HRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Hormel Foods Corporation's 0. 15β — meaning HRL is approximately -966% more volatile than CPB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 185% for Campbell Soup Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPB or HRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is pulling ahead at 6.
4% versus 1. 6% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPB or HRL?
Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus 4. 0% for Hormel Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPB leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 9% for HRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPB leads at 30. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPB or HRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Hormel Foods Corporation — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRL: 31. 6% to $27. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPB or HRL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Campbell Soup Company (CPB) offers the highest yield at 7. 3%, versus 5. 6% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL).
09Is CPB or HRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), 7. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPB: -44. 5%, HRL: -21. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPB and HRL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.