Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CPB vs GIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
CPB vs GIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $6.34B | $19.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.04B | $18.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $550M | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 29.3% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $7.21B | $15.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $132M | $364M |
CPB vs GIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| General Mills, Inc. (GIS) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPB vs GIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.02, yield 7.2%
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.02, current ratio 0.77x
GIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -9.2% 10Y total return vs CPB's -44.9%
- 12.1% margin vs CPB's 5.5%
- Lower D/E ratio (166.1% vs 184.7%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs GIS's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs CPB's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (166.1% vs 184.7%) | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GIS's 6.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -29.9% vs CPB's -35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs CPB's 3.7%, ROIC 10.6% vs 9.1% |
CPB vs GIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPB vs GIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CPB and GIS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 1.8x CPB's $10.0B. GIS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPB's 5.5%. On growth, CPB holds the edge at -4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.0B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $550M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $919M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.2% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, GIS trades at a 18% valuation discount to CPB's 10.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CPB's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GIS's 8.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | $19.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.4B | $34.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.57x | 8.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.74x | 10.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.51x | 8.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.62x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.99x | 8.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GIS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GIS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $14 for CPB. GIS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPB's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs GIS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.0% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +13.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.1B | $14.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $132M | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $15.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.14x | 5.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GIS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIS five years ago would be worth $7,472 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,806 for CPB. Over the past 12 months, GIS leads with a -29.9% total return vs CPB's -35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GIS at -21.8% vs CPB's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.5% | -19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.4% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.6% | -52.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | -25.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.0% | -21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIS is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPB's -0.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIS currently trades 64.5% from its 52-week high vs CPB's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.16 | $55.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.76 | $33.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +64.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.1M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPB and GIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CPB as "Hold" and GIS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.4% upside for GIS (target: $47) vs 21.6% for CPB (target: $26). For income investors, CPB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.20% vs GIS's 6.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.83 | $46.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.53 | $2.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +6.3% |
GIS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CPB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CPB vs GIS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPB or GIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger pick with 6.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). General Mills, Inc. (GIS) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Campbell Soup Company (CPB) a "Hold" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPB or GIS?
On trailing P/E, General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus Campbell Soup Company at 10. 6x. On forward P/E, Campbell Soup Company is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPB or GIS?
Over the past 5 years, General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) delivered a total return of -25. 3%, compared to -41. 9% for Campbell Soup Company (CPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GIS returned -9. 2% versus CPB's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPB or GIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Campbell Soup Company's -0. 02β — meaning CPB is approximately -50% more volatile than GIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General Mills, Inc. (GIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 166% versus 185% for Campbell Soup Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPB or GIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is pulling ahead at 6.
4% versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -4. 9% for General Mills, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPB or GIS?
General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus 5. 9% for Campbell Soup Company — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIS leads at 17. 0% versus 13. 2% for CPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GIS leads at 34. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPB or GIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) trades at 9.
7x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for General Mills, Inc. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GIS: 30. 4% to $46. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPB or GIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Campbell Soup Company (CPB) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 6. 7% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
09Is CPB or GIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GIS: -9. 2%, CPB: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPB and GIS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.