CWH
Camping World Holdings, Inc.
Auto - Dealerships
Market Cap$501M
5Y Perf.-62.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CWH vs WGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WGO
Winnebago Industries, Inc.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Market Cap$902M
5Y Perf.-41.3%
CWH vs WGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CWH | WGO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $501M | $902M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.31B | $2.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-94M | $36M |
| Gross Margin | 29.3% | 13.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.67B | $595M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $215M | $174M |
CWH vs WGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CWH
WGO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camping World Holdi… (CWH) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
| Winnebago Industrie… (WGO) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWH vs WGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WGO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Camping World Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CWH
Camping World Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play
CWH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth -78.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.9%
- 4.4% revenue growth vs WGO's -5.9%
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 13.7x)
Best for: growth exposure
WGO
Winnebago Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick
WGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.3%
- 92.8% 10Y total return vs CWH's -20.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 2.42x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CWH | 4.4% revenue growth vs WGO's -5.9% |
| Value | CWH | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 13.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | WGO | 1.3% margin vs CWH's -1.5% |
| Stability / Safety | WGO | Beta 1.15 vs CWH's 2.35, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CWH | 6.4% yield, vs WGO's 4.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WGO | +3.3% vs CWH's -40.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WGO | 1.7% ROA vs CWH's -1.8%, ROIC 2.6% vs 4.0% |
CWH vs WGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CWH vs WGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWGOLAGGINGCWH
CWHCamping World Holding…
1leads
WGOWinnebago Industries,…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CWHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WGO4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CWH4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WGO7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WGO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WGO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 2.2x WGO's $2.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.3% (WGO) to -1.5% (CWH). On growth, WGO holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CWHCamping World Hol… | WGOWinnebago Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $274M | $132M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$94M | $36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +13.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.8% | +2.1% |
WGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CWH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CWH's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WGO's 13.8x.
| Metric | CWHCamping World Hol… | WGOWinnebago Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $501M | $902M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.52x | 35.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.69x | 13.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.77x | 13.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.07x |
CWH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WGO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WGO delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-22 for CWH. WGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWH's 7.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WGO scores 6/9 vs CWH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CWHCamping World Hol… | WGOWinnebago Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.17x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $421M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $215M | $174M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $595M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.14x | 2.77x |
WGO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WGO five years ago would be worth $4,489 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,146 for CWH. Over the past 12 months, WGO leads with a +3.3% total return vs CWH's -40.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WGO at -15.4% vs CWH's -26.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CWHCamping World Hol… | WGOWinnebago Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.7% | -20.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.5% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.6% | -39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -55.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +92.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.7% | -15.4% |
WGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CWH's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WGO currently trades 63.7% from its 52-week high vs CWH's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CWHCamping World Hol… | WGOWinnebago Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.35x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.64 | $50.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.70 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.2% | +63.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 625K |
WGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWH and WGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CWH as "Buy" and WGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.1% upside for CWH (target: $12) vs 30.8% for WGO (target: $42). For income investors, CWH offers the higher dividend yield at 6.35% vs WGO's 4.30%.
| Metric | CWHCamping World Hol… | WGOWinnebago Industr… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $41.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.4% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $1.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.0% |
Evenly matched — CWH and WGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
WGO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallWinnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CWH vs WGO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWH or WGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Camping World Holdings, Inc.
(CWH) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO). Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) offers the better valuation at 35. 1x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWH or WGO?
On forward P/E, Camping World Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWH or WGO?
Over the past 5 years, Winnebago Industries, Inc.
(WGO) delivered a total return of -55. 1%, compared to -68. 5% for Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WGO returned +92. 8% versus CWH's -20. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWH or WGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Winnebago Industries, Inc.
(WGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Camping World Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 35β — meaning CWH is approximately 103% more volatile than WGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 7% for Camping World Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CWH or WGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Camping World Holdings, Inc.
(CWH) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -5. 9% for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Winnebago Industries, Inc. grew EPS 106. 8% year-over-year, compared to -78. 8% for Camping World Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWH leads at -2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWH or WGO?
Winnebago Industries, Inc.
(WGO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -1. 4% for Camping World Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWH leads at 2. 8% versus 2. 0% for WGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWH leads at 29. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWH or WGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Camping World Holdings, Inc.
(CWH) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Winnebago Industries, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWH: 52. 1% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWH or WGO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 4. 3% for Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO).
09Is CWH or WGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Winnebago Industries, Inc.
(WGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 4. 3% yield). Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WGO: +92. 8%, CWH: -20. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWH and WGO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CWH: -4.2% · WGO: 12.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.