DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Cap$12.81B
5Y Perf.+126.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DINO vs PSX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PSX
Phillips 66
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Cap$68.85B
5Y Perf.+119.4%
DINO vs PSX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DINO | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $12.81B | $68.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27.62B | $135.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.23B | $4.12B |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.23B | $22.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $978M | $1.12B |
DINO vs PSX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DINO
PSX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HF Sinclair Corpora… (DINO) | 100 | 226.0 | +126.0% |
| Phillips 66 (PSX) | 100 | 219.4 | +119.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DINO vs PSX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DINO leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Phillips 66 is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
The Income Pick
DINO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth -6.0%, EPS growth 241.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 185.5% 10Y total return vs PSX's 165.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PSX
Phillips 66
The Value Play
PSX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 12.6x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | DINO | -6.0% revenue growth vs PSX's -7.6% |
| Value | PSX | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 12.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | DINO | 4.5% margin vs PSX's 3.0% |
| Stability / Safety | DINO | Beta 0.31 vs PSX's 0.43, lower leverage |
| Dividends | DINO | 2.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PSX's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | DINO | +124.1% vs PSX's +67.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DINO | 7.1% ROA vs PSX's 5.3%, ROIC 6.1% vs 5.3% |
DINO vs PSX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
DINO vs PSX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDINOLAGGINGPSX
PSXPhillips 66
0leads
DINOHF Sinclair Corporati…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PSXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DINO6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
DINO4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DINO6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
DINO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DINO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSX is the larger business by revenue, generating $135.8B annually — 4.9x DINO's $27.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.5% (DINO) to 3.0% (PSX).
| Metric | DINOHF Sinclair Corpo… | PSXPhillips 66 |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.6B | $135.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $119M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +7.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +135.3% | -56.8% |
DINO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
DINO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, PSX trades at a 30% valuation discount to DINO's 22.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DINO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSX's 13.3x.
| Metric | DINOHF Sinclair Corpo… | PSXPhillips 66 |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.8B | $68.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.1B | $90.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.86x | 15.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | 11.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.17x | 13.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.80x | 25.23x |
DINO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DINO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSX delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $13 for DINO. DINO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSX's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSX scores 7/9 vs DINO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | DINOHF Sinclair Corpo… | PSXPhillips 66 |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $21.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $978M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $22.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.13x | 7.65x |
DINO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DINO and PSX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSX five years ago would be worth $22,538 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,242 for DINO. Over the past 12 months, DINO leads with a +124.1% total return vs PSX's +67.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSX at 25.4% vs DINO's 25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DINOHF Sinclair Corpo… | PSXPhillips 66 |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.8% | +32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +124.1% | +67.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | +97.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.4% | +125.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +185.5% | +165.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.4% | +25.4% |
Evenly matched — DINO and PSX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DINO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DINO is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSX's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DINO currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs PSX's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DINOHF Sinclair Corpo… | PSXPhillips 66 |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.72 | $190.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.39 | $104.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.1 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 3.1M |
DINO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DINO and PSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DINO as "Buy" and PSX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -4.9% upside for PSX (target: $163) vs -13.4% for DINO (target: $62). For income investors, DINO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs PSX's 2.74%.
| Metric | DINOHF Sinclair Corpo… | PSXPhillips 66 |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.57 | $163.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.02 | $4.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +1.8% |
Evenly matched — DINO and PSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
DINO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallHF Sinclair Corporation (DINO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DINO vs PSX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DINO or PSX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) is the stronger pick with -6.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 6% for Phillips 66 (PSX). Phillips 66 (PSX) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DINO or PSX?
On trailing P/E, Phillips 66 (PSX) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus HF Sinclair Corporation at 22. 9x. On forward P/E, Phillips 66 is actually cheaper at 11. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DINO or PSX?
Over the past 5 years, Phillips 66 (PSX) delivered a total return of +125.
4%, compared to +122. 4% for HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DINO returned +185. 5% versus PSX's +165. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DINO or PSX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus Phillips 66's 0. 43β — meaning PSX is approximately 39% more volatile than DINO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 76% for Phillips 66 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DINO or PSX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) is pulling ahead at -6.
0% versus -7. 6% for Phillips 66 (PSX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HF Sinclair Corporation grew EPS 241. 8% year-over-year, compared to 116. 2% for Phillips 66. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSX leads at -8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DINO or PSX?
Phillips 66 (PSX) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for HF Sinclair Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DINO leads at 3. 5% versus 2. 7% for PSX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DINO leads at 5. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DINO or PSX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phillips 66 (PSX) trades at 11.
7x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for HF Sinclair Corporation — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSX: -4. 9% to $163. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — DINO or PSX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 7% for Phillips 66 (PSX).
09Is DINO or PSX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
31), 2. 8% yield, +185. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DINO: +185. 5%, PSX: +165. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DINO and PSX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DINO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PSX is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DINO: 11.8% · PSX: 11.7%)Net Margin>
%
(DINO: 4.5% · PSX: 3.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(DINO: 22.9x · PSX: 15.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.