EM
Smart Share Global Limited
Personal Products & Services
Market Cap$153M
5Y Perf.-84.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EM vs NXRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
REIT - Residential
Market Cap$758M
5Y Perf.-42.4%
EM vs NXRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EM | NXRT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $153M | $758M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.07B | $252M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-250M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 62.4% | 91.1% |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $7M | $1.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $787M | $14M |
EM vs NXRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EM
NXRT
| Stock | Apr 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Share Global … (EM) | 100 | 15.8 | -84.2% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 57.6 | -42.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EM vs NXRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EM and NXRT are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EM
Smart Share Global Limited
The Defensive Pick
EM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 3.17x
- Beta 0.07, yield 5.3%, current ratio 3.17x
- -8.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- Rev growth -3.2%, EPS growth -30.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.6%
- 211.0% 10Y total return vs EM's -85.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NXRT | -3.2% FFO/revenue growth vs EM's -36.0% |
| Quality / Margins | EM | -8.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% |
| Stability / Safety | EM | Beta 0.07 vs NXRT's 0.62, lower leverage |
| Dividends | NXRT | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EM's 5.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | EM | +7.7% vs NXRT's -15.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NXRT | -1.7% ROA vs EM's -5.7%, ROIC 1.1% vs -2.6% |
EM vs NXRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
EM vs NXRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMLAGGINGNXRT
NXRTNexPoint Residential …
3leads
EMSmart Share Global Li…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NXRTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NXRT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EM4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NXRT5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
EM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
NXRT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 12.2x NXRT's $252M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -8.2% (EM) to -12.7% (NXRT). On growth, NXRT holds the edge at +0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $252M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$106M | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$250M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.4% | +91.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +31.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +149.4% | 0.0% |
NXRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EM's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $153M | $758M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -74.06x | -23.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.28x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.01x | 18.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 2.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.06x |
EM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NXRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EM delivers a -9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. EM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NXRT scores 4/9 vs EM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.0% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 5.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$781M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $787M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.98x | 0.47x |
NXRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NXRT five years ago would be worth $7,826 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,599 for EM. Over the past 12 months, EM leads with a +7.7% total return vs NXRT's -15.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EM at 8.8% vs NXRT's -5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.7% | -15.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | -15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | -21.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | +211.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | -5.4% |
EM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EM is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXRT's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EM currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs NXRT's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.46 | $38.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $23.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.8% | +77.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.6 | 69.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 65K | 219K |
EM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EM as "Hold" and NXRT as "Hold". For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.06% vs EM's 5.27%.
| Metric | EMSmart Share Globa… | NXRTNexPoint Resident… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $2.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +1.0% |
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NXRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EM leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
Best OverallSmart Share Global Limited (EM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EM vs NXRT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EM or NXRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger pick with -3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 0% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM). Analysts rate Smart Share Global Limited (EM) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EM or NXRT?
Over the past 5 years, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) delivered a total return of -21. 7%, compared to -84. 0% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 0% versus EM's -85. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EM or NXRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning NXRT is approximately 777% more volatile than EM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Share Global Limited (EM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EM or NXRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is pulling ahead at -3. 2% versus -36. 0% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Smart Share Global Limited grew EPS -116. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NXRT leads at -1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EM or NXRT?
Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
7% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXRT leads at 11. 1% versus -3. 8% for EM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EM or NXRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 5. 3% for Smart Share Global Limited (EM).
07Is EM or NXRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Share Global Limited (EM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07), 5. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EM: -85. 7%, NXRT: +211. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EM and NXRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (EM (Consumer Cyclical) and NXRT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EM: -24.7% · NXRT: 0.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.