Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ENSC vs COLL vs PCRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ENSC vs COLL vs PCRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.27B | $930M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $796M | $735M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $75M | $9M |
| Gross Margin | -93.4% | 60.7% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | -245.9% | 23.7% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.4x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $302K | $941M | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $251M | $159M |
ENSC vs COLL vs PCRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensysce Biosciences… (ENSC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Collegium Pharmaceu… (COLL) | 100 | 178.3 | +78.3% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENSC vs COLL vs PCRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENSC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 133.5%, EPS growth 2.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- 133.5% revenue growth vs PCRX's 3.6%
COLL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 153.1% 10Y total return vs PCRX's -51.2%
- Lower P/E (5.4x vs 8.6x)
- 9.4% margin vs ENSC's -244.5%
PCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47 vs ENSC's 1.02
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 133.5% revenue growth vs PCRX's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.4x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs ENSC's -244.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs ENSC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.4% vs ENSC's -82.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs ENSC's -231.5% |
ENSC vs COLL vs PCRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ENSC vs COLL vs PCRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COLL leads in 3 of 6 categories
PCRX leads 1 • ENSC leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLL is the larger business by revenue, generating $796M annually — 177.4x ENSC's $4M. COLL is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENSC's -2.4%. On growth, COLL holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $796M | $735M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $472M | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $75M | $9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $330M | $133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -93.4% | +60.7% | +60.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +23.7% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +9.4% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -159.7% | +41.4% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.6% | +8.9% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +4.4% | -30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ENSC and COLL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, COLL trades at a 85% valuation discount to PCRX's 147.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COLL's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PCRX's 9.9x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1.3B | $930M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 22.73x | 147.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.43x | 8.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.75x | 9.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 1.63x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 5.18x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.89x | 6.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COLL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COLL delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ENSC. ENSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLL's 3.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs COLL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | +26.7% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +4.6% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.0% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.9% | +15.8% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 3.12x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $689M | $296M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $251M | $159M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $301,660 | $941M | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -455.37x | 1.80x | 2.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COLL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COLL five years ago would be worth $17,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ENSC. Over the past 12 months, COLL leads with a +45.4% total return vs ENSC's -82.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COLL at 18.9% vs ENSC's -80.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.6% | -13.6% | -3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.0% | +45.4% | -6.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +67.9% | -44.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +71.0% | -62.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +153.1% | -51.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.7% | +18.9% | -17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENSC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCRX currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs ENSC's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.65x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $50.79 | $27.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $26.72 | $18.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.5% | +77.4% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 62.4 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 543K | 695K |
Analyst Outlook
ENSC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COLL as "Buy", PCRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.5% upside for COLL (target: $58) vs 24.8% for PCRX (target: $30). ENSC is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $58.00 | $29.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $166.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | +16.0% |
COLL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PCRX leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ENSC vs COLL vs PCRX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENSC or COLL or PCRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ensysce Biosciences, Inc.
(ENSC) is the stronger pick with 133. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (5. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENSC or COLL or PCRX?
On trailing P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is the cheapest at 22. 7x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 147. 8x. On forward P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENSC or COLL or PCRX?
Over the past 5 years, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) delivered a total return of +71. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. (ENSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COLL returned +153. 1% versus ENSC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENSC or COLL or PCRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning ENSC is approximately 118% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. (ENSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENSC or COLL or PCRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ensysce Biosciences, Inc.
(ENSC) is pulling ahead at 133. 5% versus 3. 6% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COLL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENSC or COLL or PCRX?
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -153. 3% for Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLL leads at 24. 0% versus -129. 2% for ENSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCRX leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENSC or COLL or PCRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) trades at 5. 4x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COLL: 47. 5% to $58. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENSC or COLL or PCRX?
In this comparison, ENSC (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. COLL, PCRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENSC or COLL or PCRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCRX: -51. 2%, ENSC: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENSC and COLL and PCRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ENSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; COLL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ENSC pays a dividend while COLL, PCRX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.